After reading that awful piece on the Roth biographer, about systematically grooming & sexually assaulting his students and just being disgusted with how much of an unbelievable creep he is, I thought to myself, 'there's no way he's gonna defend this guy'. But nope...I was wrong. 
You, a hypocritical lib: This dude groomed & abused his 8th grade students. He is a monster.
Me, a consistent, principled journalist: Oh yeah? Well, what about Obama?
Me, a consistent, principled journalist: Oh yeah? Well, what about Obama?
If there is one thing you can objectively say Glenn is 'principled' in his defense of these days, its in defense of older men preying on teens & other various sex pests. And of course it's not bc he has his own self interests involved. That would be an odious smear.
And of course, 0 mention of the Matt Gaetz story. You know, the one where he was just waiting to see 'proof' before making a judgment. Funny. Just like all the other things he was 'waiting for proof' for.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
