“we as former contestants feel th need to speak out against the messaging that these choices communicated — either intentionally or unintentionally — by the contestant Kelly Donohue and, implicitly by association, the producers of “Jeopardy!””
Could you be any more obnoxious?
“Kelly responded to a clue with a term for the Roma that is considered a slur. The use of this term doesn’t necessarily indicate malice . . . . Current diversity style guides, however, suggest that it not be used.”
Well good for the style guides! Fucking word police. 🙄
“Kelly made a gesture with his hand that he has since claimed was an indication that he had won three games. He had, on previous episodes, indicated with one finger and two fingers that he had won one and two games,” . . .
“and no reasonable person would have interpreted those gestures differently. However, this gesture was not a clear-cut symbol for the number three.”
Yes, it fucking was. He tapped his chest with three fingers, you fucking pompous, disingenuous morons.
“Regardless of his stated intent, the gesture is a racist dog whistle. Some of the first people to notice this . . . were viewers who couldn’t believe what they’d seen, captured it on video, and shared it to Twitter.”
No it isn’t, & half-wits thinking so doesn’t change that.
“Most problematic . . . is the fact that Kelly has not publicly apologized for the ramifications of the gesture he made. If something has been misconstrued, an apology and a total disavowal of any connection to white supremacist doctrines is called for.” NO IT ISN’T.
“We cannot stand up for hate. We cannot stand next to hate. We cannot stand onstage with something that looks like hate.”
This is off the charts performative narcissism; it’s giving Meghan a run for her money.
“Is the production team of “Jeopardy!” prepared for more of this? Prepared for more attempts to disguise contempt as innocent gesturing? Prepared for the backlash and ramifications should one of those moments ever become tied to real-world violence?”
This is straight up insane.
The folks writing & signing this piece of garbage need to seriously re-evaluate their life choices & seek mental health services immediately. The entitled, ignorant, condescending presentation reeks of flaming personality disorder.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Giuliani case: unless the govt knows *significantly* different facts from what is being & has been historically reported about Giuliani’s dealings in Ukraine, I see little to no facts to support probable cause for a FARA violation & therefore to execute a search warrant. /1
This case looks extremely suspect to me. FARA is a technical statute aimed at specific conduct. It is seldom prosecuted criminally. DOJ has been trying to expand it in recent years, (not just against political figures) as Is typical of agencies looking to self-expand. /2
WaPo’s article about it today, e.g., was tellingly devoid of facts that would actually constitute a violation of the statute. It reads like it was somehow illegal to try to investigate the Ukraine/Biden/Burisma/Yovanovitch issues, which it wasn’t, under FARA or otherwise. /3
Gotta disagree. This is on all of us for tolerating bullshit “offenses” like this to stay on the books & on the stupid Supreme Court for authorizing police to detain & arrest people for non-incarcerable offenses such as this.
Fucking Mickey Mouse charges are the result of over-criminalization because a bunch of “Karens” write our laws & those laws do little beyond empowering bad cops to abuse their powers.
Exhibit A: I once drove 100 miles round trip on I-95 for 6 months straight with totally dead tags & a busted tail-light. Never got pulled over. Take a wild guess why. 🙄
@lilyq1011 Exactly. Stop explaining your choices to people who don’t care about you. They are not entitled to it.
Also, stop answering questions that people should not be asking you. Just because someone thinks they want to know something doesn’t mean they get to.
@lilyq1011 Women especially have trouble with these ideas, which are really just setting healthy boundaries. It see it with young female lawyers & clients.
You don’t have to answer every question! You get to decide each time whether it’s in your interest to answer or not!
Noem’s “defense” is that her state would be alone on an island fighting the left (NCAA & ACLU, etc.) in court & would be penalized by NCAA on this issue if she signs a bill that applies to colleges. She wants to do a “coalition” 1st to fight them as part of a team instead.
When the issue is one of balancing equally valuable or comparable interests or competing material costs & benefits, this is wise. When the issue is one of principle, this is cowardice.
If you’re not willing to sacrifice for your “principle,” it isn’t one.
So the Harry & Meghan interview presents a good opportunity to see how other people you know analyze- or don’t -information they receive. Many, many people accept everything at face value - because they saw it. Also, info presented w/emotion - whether real or not - persuades. /1
Critical thinkers -who will be more fair & objective- will compare what they are hearing & seeing w/their experience of the world (from life or from education) & how it works, including how human beings usually act & the mental issues they can have. Most people struggle w/this./2
The most fair evaluation will consider whether someone is mistaken instead of lying, whether their view is genuinely held even though it may be objectively wrong, & whether someone’s experience may lead them to different but equally valid conclusions from yours. /3
This is Democrat theatre for sure. But I think it also separately reflects the unfortunate reality that the Capitol is likely not currently defensible against even a small but professionally trained force intent on killing our legislature if assembled by any one of our enemies.
The powers that be won’t admit publicly that this is true, but it obviously is. Setting everything else aside, the riot on Jan 6 exposed that actual security at the Capitol was pretty nonexistent. One of our special ops teams could’ve waltzed in there in no time.
We live in an open society. Our enemies can relatively easily operate amongst us. The security pros must have been/be horrified at how clear it made it that the Capitol is a soft target.