1/ 🧵 I spent the last week looking into the BTC futures basis trade (on the unregulated exchanges).

I thought I'd share some thoughts as to my findings...

👇👇👇
(Did I do that right?)
2/ 📉 First, what is it?

On FTX, the June 25th BTC futures contract (BTC-0625) is trading for $60,168. The underlying index price is $57,895.

The trade is to put up 1 BTC as collateral and short the futures contract, waiting for the spread to converge at expiration.
3/ And the annualized return of this trade is surprisingly juicy. Approximately:

(60,168 / 57,895) ^ (365.25 / 55) - 1 ≈ 29%

So juicy, you have to ask: "wait, why aren't more people doing this?"
4/ The first reason is that this isn't a riskless trade.

There is exchange risk (e.g. FTX could get hacked or they could mismanage collateral risk).

But this can be semi-managed via diversification (e.g. do this on FTX, Kraken, Deribit, Binance, etc)
5/ The second reason is that the FTX futures contract actually settles to a last hour TWAP.

So 1 BTC isn't perfect collateral, because the price could plunge in the last minute of trading and you'd "owe" a higher value on the futures contract.
6/ But even this can be solved fairly trivially. Either just roll early (and take some risk that the premium might not have come in all the way) or just exit the position evenly over the last hour of trading.
7/ So why aren't more people doing this? We're talking 30% annualized here!

Well, limits to arbitrage might be one answer.
8/ These are unregulated exchanges and therefore won't cater to U.S. residents (and a few other jurisdictions).

So if you want to play, you need to live outside the U.S. and be able to prove it.
9/ U.S. residents can do some squirrely stuff to get around this, but without going through the KYC, you'll be prohibited by how much USD-value you can take off the exchange each day (e.g. $2-9k).

So your money will be stuck. 💸
10/ But there are plenty of brilliant international investors. Why aren't they doing this trade?

In briefly surveying investors, one answer seems to be behavioral.

🙈🙊🙉
11/ For a lot of people playing in the crypto ecosystem, a 30% return seems quaint.

Especially for smaller investors who might be playing with less money. With $5k, would you rather earn a near "riskless" $1.5k, or do a 3x ETH trade?
12/ And this demand for leverage may be precisely *why* the premium exists in the first place.

It seems to coincide with retail demand for leverage.

(I think this line of thinking is wrong; this is an arbitrage trade, not a crypto trade. But I digress...)
13/ This also means that the premium ebbs and flows. So, you have to consider how much capital you want to get tied up in a trade that might disappear a month later.

And then you need to off-ramp all your capital. (Or leave it in stable coins.)
14/ Then there's the costs to consider. There's operational burden, transaction costs, and taxes that need to be accounted for.

Again, all solvable, but a burden for someone entering the space.
15/ BUT EVEN AFTER ALL THIS, CAN WE JUSTIFY 30%?!

This isn't the CME futures. We don't have to put up cash collateral.

We just need to put up 1 BTC and it's a near-perfect arbitrage!
16/ That is, until you read the non-USD margin rules.

In particular, the policy on liquidation.

help.ftx.com/hc/en-us/artic…
17/ That 2nd bullet, in particular, is key.

If you put up 1 BTC and short 1 futures contract and both go up $30k (a ~50% move for BTC today), you'll get liquidated.
18/ "Corey, that can't be right! Surely it's not the PnL on the futures contract, but the PnL on the total position, right?"

Nope. I confirmed with FTX.
19/ So if you want to do this trade with $1mm, you'd get liquidated after a 3% move in BTC.

And THERE'S your limit to arbitrage.
20/ What about the other exchanges?

I haven’t found hard dollar liquidation levels, but it does look like margin balance doesn’t account for coin-margin.

(Though Kraken’s inverse futures might be different.)
21/ Important re-reading here!

So if BTC + futures go up $30k, you’d have part of your BTC position liquidated into cash to reset the margin to $0.

But now the “arbitrage” has been unwound.

22/ So let’s say we want to put a $1mm trade on.

If we think BTC can quickly move +50% over the life of the trade, we’d probably need to be ready to move ~$500k in collateral in at any time.
23/ So instead of a 30%, we’re probably talking a 20% return with more conservative collateral usage.

Still juicy enough?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Corey Hoffstein 🏴‍☠️

Corey Hoffstein 🏴‍☠️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @choffstein

10 Apr
New 🏴‍☠️Pirates of Finance episode out!

@JasonMutiny and I talk collectibles and have a special guest on to talk about the world of Scotch.

If you enjoy, please like, subscribe, and leave us a comment!

And if you don’t, let us know that too!

@JasonMutiny Some highlights…

1. UHNW investors have more money in collectibles than gold/precious metals.

(Are they just coming up with an excuse to buy what they want?)
@JasonMutiny 2. “What is a collectible?”

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

But it’s a pretty big and diverse space.
Read 9 tweets
1 Apr
These new Morningstar quantitative ratings are hot garbage.

I’m getting negative scores for managing 10 funds and having $0 invested in my own fund.

Neither of those are true.

The fact this was released tells me M* still doesn’t realize the influence it has on the industry.
And that’s despite the fact there are papers documenting that changes in Morningstar’s rating methodologies have literally changed the very structure of cross-sectional returns in the market.

That’s POWER.
“But Corey, your SAI says you don’t have any money in your fund!”

First, I am an owner/operator. Different situation. Second, maybe I have it in another vehicle.

But I don’t. I literally have it in the fund. It’s just that the SAI is updated ANNUALLY.
Read 11 tweets
13 Mar
In our latest video, @JasonMutiny and I explore the reflation trade.

- What is it?
- Where does the evidence stand?
- What trades might you consider in your portfolio?

Stuffed with graphs from JPM, GS, Nomura, and SocGen.
@JasonMutiny A few graphs and charts you’ll see:

Consumers have a lot of savings and are feeling pretty wealthy right now...
@JasonMutiny Real goods spending has recovered, but services not so much.

So is the consumer WILLING to spend, they’re just not being allowed to?
Read 10 tweets
5 Mar
1/ I received a DM this morning asking me about "recommended reading" in the space of trend following.

This all depends upon what you're looking for and your expertise, but I figured I'd share some thoughts publicly...
2/ Trend Following with Managed Futures (by @katykam)

- Approachable introduction for beginners
- Exploration of approach via data
- Explains dispersion in managed futures through strategy-specific betas

Technical Difficulty: ★☆☆☆☆

amazon.com/Trend-Followin…
3/ A Quantitative Approach to Tactical Asset Allocation (by @MebFaber)

- Very accessible exploration of a simple trend rule on different asset classes

Technical Difficulty: ★☆☆☆☆

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
Read 11 tweets
26 Feb
1/

Interesting little anec-data…

Taking current ARKK holdings...

I went back to 1/29 data and found implied vols for 100%, 90%, and 80% moneyness on top 15 holdings.

I also found ARKK’s IVs for 100%, 90%, and 80% moneyness
2/

Normalizing the top 15 weights, you can use this data to back out an implied correlation.
3/

Here’s the weird part…

The implied correlation was basically flat (at around 62%).

In other words, the market was saying, “if this basket falls, we don’t think underlying correlations will go up."
Read 5 tweets
27 Dec 20
1/ As I watch the basket of retail favorite equities and BTC make new highs into the end of the year, I can only hang my head.

Because my performance was absolute rubbish this year.

What went right? What went wrong? Read on. 👇
2/ I should start by saying that my core mandates have historically sought to participate with equity market growth and preserve capital in equity market declines.

They embedded three key tilts:

1. Trend
2. Value
3. Size

(You can probably see where this is going...)
3/ Value and Size have largely been "unintended" byproducts of our portfolio design.

Specifically, we applied trend-following signals within an equally-weighted portfolio of equity sectors (e.g. Tech, Financials, Health Care, Staples etc).
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!