Locust swarms in the 1800s were a hurricane of insects which ate everything in sight
If you're a subsistence farmer, you REALLY need your crops.
If they're eaten by bugs, you aren't going to have food for the winter.
The 1875 swarm, named Albert's swarm, was intensively studied by entomologists.
The most valuable information, however, came from someone who wasn't even an amateur entomologist.
Albert Child was an amateur meteorologist!
Albert Child was educated as a doctor, and served in the US Army. After leaving the army, he became a school superintendent.
Soon after, he discovered a love of farming and moved to Nebraska.
He had an interest in meteorology, and kept meticulous records about the weather
When the 1875 swarm hit Nebraska, Child's first instinct was to do the impossible. He wanted to measure the swarm.
He used the swarm's speed to measure the width, and a telescope to measure the height.
His measurements:
1,800 miles long
110 miles wide
1/3rd miles high
There is no way to know how many individual insects were in the swarm.
Conservative estimates are in the tens of trillions. The likely number is in the hundreds of trillions.
So, how and WHY, did these insects go extinct?
Well, it comes down to their habitat and biology.
While they were widespread, that's only because they were able and willing to fly long distances.
They mostly bred in the river basins of the rocky mountians.
Unlike most grasshoppers, their eggs weren't buried deeply, and suffocated easily if flooded.
As agriculture overtook The West, many of their egg cases were trampled by livestock and smashed by ploughs.
Beavers nearly went extinct, disrupting dams and flooding breeding grounds.
Wolves and cougars were over-hunted, causing overgrazing of food supplies at the same time.
The Rocky Mountain Locust only had a few breeding grounds, but they were connected by the high mobility of the species.
As fewer locusts survived, the breeding grounds went unused and they were out-competed.
It could have survived any one of these assaults, but the combination of all of them was just too much.
The last verified specimen was collected in 1902, and the Rocky Mountain locust was officially declared extinct in 2014.
No living entomologist has seen a live specimen.
Since 1902, the species has become somewhat of a "cryptid".
Sporadic reports come in (we've even received a report via @Stylopidae's DMs), but none have ever been verified.
While it's always possible that a non-migratory form exists, there's no evidence to support this.
We always think that these animals are immune to extinction, but there's a lot of parallels between the Rocky Mountian locust, the periodical cicada, and even the Monarch butterfly.
Each one of these animals, the cicadas, the Monarch, and the Rocky Mountain Locust, exist in huge numbers but can only breed in relatively small habitats.
The Rocky Mountain locust existed in much higher numbers than either of these.
"Death by a thousand cuts" is the idea that many small things can interact to cause extinction, even if one thing wasn't enough to cause extinction.
When we talk about insect declines, the Rocky Mountain locust is our cautionary tale.
Sources:
Lockwood, J. A. (2009). Locust: the devastating rise and mysterious disappearance of the insect that shaped the American frontier. Basic Books.
Riley, C. V. (1877). The rocky mountain locust. The American Naturalist, 11(11), 663-673.
Lockwood, J. R. (2010). The fate of the Rocky Mountain locust, Melanoplus spretus Walsh: implications for conservation biology. Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews, 3(2), 129-160.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, I've been thinking about how to properly respond to this...and there's really no way to do that because we will never be able to take our ecosystems from Earth to other planets.
What Musk proposes here is (as @Myrmecos pointed out) simply impossible.
The most important is a reference strain. Lots of mosquitoes were being bred in labs before pesticides were introduced, so we *know* they're not resistant to them.
If we're curious about a modern population, we can compare and use them as a standard.
Besides reference strains for pesticides, we know that the lab reference strains can transmit most of the 'normal' diseases that Ae. aegypti spread.
However, not all populations of Ae. aegypti spread every disease.
For our first #DeepDive since our hiatus, let's talk about a disease that we'll be hearing *a lot* about in our near future: Huanglongbing, or Citrus Greening disease.
Specifically, how do we know the disease even exists?
The inspiration for this one comes from an activist group who was trying to spread the idea that Huanglongbing (HLB and/or CG from here on out) was predominantly caused by herbicide damage.
HLB was first described in Western science journals in 1919.
However, farmers in China had known about the disease for several generations and had called it 'Yellow dragon disease' and the earliest written records dated back to the 1870s.