1/6) The hadiths by Abu Dawud and Khatib al-baghdad tell us that the 1 sect of out of the 73 that's saved is As-Sawadul Adham (The Vast Majority). The 4 schools of fiqh and the 3 schools of creed have always represented the majority.
Next...
@FloidHidden @ali_aqeedah 2/6) Salafiyyah know they're a minority and to protect themselves they reproduce statements from the salaf to suggest that the minority in the Ummah can be the saved sect. Ibn Mas'ud's statement was said to ulema who lived in Baghdad during the emergence of an early heresy.
@FloidHidden @ali_aqeedah 3/6) He was reassuring them that even if the whole city falls under heresy, you two represent the majority which is spread all over the Muslim world. Just because one city or town falls into heresy does not mean the entire Ummah from China to Spain have sunk into heresy as well.
@FloidHidden @ali_aqeedah 4/6) This is the same for Muslims living in non-Muslims. Two believers amongst a town of unbelievers REPRESENT the jama'ah because they are still conected to the vast majority spread the world over. Regarding the Mu'tazila they were NEVER a majority in Baghdad!
@FloidHidden @ali_aqeedah 5/6) They gained prominence by political muscle. Their use of violence to gain conformity tells us they were a minority. The masses/laiety did not support them, which is why they had to force the ulema because they knew if they could get them on side, the public would follow.
@FloidHidden @ali_aqeedah 6/6) The only way they did this was to threaten the ulema to chop their heads off if they didn't publically declare their support of them. Those ulema simply paid lip service to save their necks, and formally declared their Sunnism as soon as the khalifa ended the inquisition.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@SalafisUnveiled@AlShurahbeel A jamāʿ is represented by it's beliefs. If those beliefs are kufr, the jamāʿ is kufr. But the individuals within it cannot be judged kuffār. If they have affirmed the shahada they are regarded as Muslims - even if they claim affiliation to that jamā...
@SalafisUnveiled@AlShurahbeel Every Muslim is, by default, presumed innocent if they manifest kufr by the following excuses:
@SalafisUnveiled@AlShurahbeel These excuses are impediments [manāwiʿ] to making takfīr on that person. The impediments are presumed to be in place for everyone & takfīr can only be made when each of them are "lifted". The only one with the jurisdiction to lift them is an elite jurist [mujtahid]...
[1-8] ilāh & rabb are inseparable
[9-14]
• MIAW redefined ilāh
• used this to redefine the shahada
• made takfir on anyone who disagreed
[15-19] contradicted the Salaf
[20-21] killed Muslims who opposed him
[22-24] Review
Salafis, it's normal to be upset when your beliefs are challenged. But a bricked-wall defensiveness is a sign that Allah left you misguided. Before reading, please make a duʿa for guidance, from wherever it may be🤲
Sunnis, be generous of character: the truth is on your side.
[1]
The word god [ilāh] is sometimes defined as that which is “worthy of wor-ship”.
Allah is the only one worthy of worship.
Why? Because He is the LORD of all existence. It is His Lordship (creator, sustainer, cause of harm and benefit) that makes Him WORTHY of worship.📖
@MilitantVerbal@SalafisUnveiled@Al_Herawi@PonderingSpiri3@theshishaking O I'm not uncomfortable. Far from it. I've sat here and watched you commit intellectual suicide. I studied Buhuti's quote AT LENGTH last year because MIAW used it & his brother Sheikhul Islam Suleiman gave him a proverbial slap in the face when he exposed him...
@MilitantVerbal@SalafisUnveiled@Al_Herawi@PonderingSpiri3@theshishaking ... by showing both the context & MIAW's ignorance of basic Arabic grammar. Inshallah a thread is coming on this & when it hits I hope it will teach you to have more humility in your speech. "You're twice my level"? Sure. I don't care. I'm an idiot, a fool, a sinner. But..
Now I know you never read this quote directly from the actual book. Because if you had read the full quote in it's wider context of the discussion, and if you knew that Buhuti didn't actually say it but was quoting...
Forgive me brother, but I fail to understand the Salafi distinction between tawassul (e.g. using your good deeds = halal) and istighatha (using a wali/prophet = shirk)...
Salafis say: istighathah or tawassul with the living is halal because they're “alive, hearing & can fulfil your need” but with a dead person it’s shirk because they can’t hear and are motionless...
[THREAD] UNDERSTANDING PAGAN GODS... AND WHY IBN ABDUL WAHHAB DIDN'T UNDERSTAND SHIRK
A polite Salafi brother sent me this hadith (online Salafi edition) as evidence the Jahili Arabs believed in Allah's sole rububiyyah (Creator, Sustainer, etc)
Let's break this down inshallah
1) The mushrikun said Allah had no partner. The Prophet ﷺ then condemns them. Why? Because they also said Allah DOES have a partner but that partner has no mastery over Allah. I.e. there's another being like Allah (co-sharer in His attributes) but Allah is stronger than him.
2) Even so, they still worshipped Him because they believed he shared in Allah's rububiyyah. Remember, an ilah ("god" or "one you worship") in the Al-Lisānul-Arab is the one you believe possesses rububiyyah. If they didn't possess rububiyyah they wouldn't be WORTHY of worship.