1. Our Petition seeking the Hon'ble Supreme Court's intervention in the #BengalViolence was filed in the afternoon of May 3, 2021. By the afternoon of May 4, 2021, all queries raised by the SC Registry were addressed and cleared.
2. We filed a request as per procedure to list the matter urgently citing the situation in Bengal. Despite this, the matter was not listed on May 5th
3. Accordingly, our arguing Counsels Senior Advocate Ms. Pinky Anand and Mr. @jsaideepak along with the Advocate on Record Mr. Suvidutt Sundaram sought to orally mention the matter before Justice U. U. Lalit on May 6, 2021.
4. However, the said request too was not allowed by SC Registry despite being informed of the grave urgency in the matter.
5. A second letter of urgency was moved on May 6th, which too has been turned down by the Registry.
6. It is indeed unfortunate that the Hon'ble Supreme Court opens up at midnight for convicted terrorists but hasn't listed a petition in relation to #bengalviolence while lives are still being lost. Clearly, some are more equal than others.
7. Since today is the last working day of the Supreme Court before it shuts for summer until June 28th, we will seek its urgent listing once more before a vacation bench.
8. In the meantime, we are working on alternatives since our team has been flooded with videos and pictures of the ghastly targeted violence in Bengal, and we owe a duty to the victims to do everything we can.
9. Our Writ Petition has been registered after repeated follow-ups with the SC Registry as W. P. (C) No. 530/2021
10. We are moving a third letter of urgency for listing our Writ Petition before a vacation bench of the Supreme Court.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Indic Collective

Indic Collective Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @indiccollective

30 Mar
1. The separate board for administration of Hindu temples recently proposed by the BJP is presumably stated in the context of Tamil Nadu. If that is so, it is hardly a step forward, given that some "saints and scholars" are already a part of TNHRCE albeit in an advisory role.
2. However, the announcement has generated speculation about the possibility of a national board that manages all temples, just as there are centralized institutions of other religions that manage the affairs of all their properties and operations.
3. BJP must clarify if they're proposing the board of administration for TN or India. The response will have to be provided accordingly. But since there's been much debate already on the idea of a national board, we are sharing the considered view of trustees of @indiccollective.
Read 16 tweets
31 Aug 20
1. A writ petition has been filed by the Baaridar Sangharsh Committee before the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir challenging the constitutionality of the Jammu & Kashmir
Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Act ,1988. indianexpress.com/article/india/…
2. The community has sought return of the Temple's administration to the Baaridar community, the traditional guardians of the Temple.
3. Upon being approached by the Baaridar Sangharsh Committee for inputs on the petition prior to its filing, the @indiccollective shared its research and inputs based on its experience of handling similar issues.
Read 6 tweets
25 Jun 20
1.The Petition filed by our Trustee @ShreehariK before Karnataka HC was listed today before the bench comprising Hon. Chief Justice Abhay Srinivas Oka & Justice Natraj Rangaswamy. In d last hearing, HC had directed the Govt to expedite d pymt of Rs.12,000 tasdik pymt to Archakas.
2. Today d Govt informed Court that of Rs.37 crores released [subsequent to filing of our petition], only Rs.13 crores has been t/f to Temple A/cs and balance is in process. @ShreehariK submitted that despite Court following up every week, d Govt is taking too long to send money.
3. @ShreehariK further submitted that merely because temples are opened, a conclusion cannot be drawn that Archakas begin to earn income. An affidavit was filed in this regard. It was submitted that in rural areas there is little footfall in temples even on regular days.
Read 12 tweets
22 Jun 20
1. The Jagannath Temple Rath Yatra matter was mentioned before Justice Arun Mishra's Bench today by the Counsel for the State Government of Odisha, Mr. Harish Salve for modification of the order dated June 18, 2020.
2. The Bench has directed the matter to be listed at the end of the board after consulting with the Chief Justice of India.
3. The CJI has directed the matter to be taken up at 2.30 P. M. The Solicitor General Shri Tushar Mehta, and the State Government's Counsel Shri Harish Salve both inform the CJI that they have instructions with respect to the Rath Yatra.
Read 23 tweets
3 Jun 20
1.The Petition filed by our Trustee
@ShreehariK before Karnataka HC was listed today before the bench comprising Hon. Chief Justice Abhay Srinivas Oka & Justice Vishwajith Shetty. Govt stated that over 80-90% of the Temples have received the Tasdik Amt of Rs.12,000
2. @ShreehariK stated that the Fund has to move from Finance Dept - DC Office- Tahsildar - Temple A/c - Archaka, so he can't comment on veracity of the 90% claim by Govt although information from Archakas is that no money is received as yet.
3. The Govt. further stated that 18,347 Archakas have received ration kits out of ~34,200. @ShreehariK submitted that this only means half archakas have been given kits, despite the fact that it's been almost a month since it's were announced.
Read 7 tweets
27 May 20
1. The Hearing in the matter of PIL filed by our Trustee @ShreehariK seeking relief to the Archakas came up for hearing today before the Karnataka HC Bench consisting of Chief Justice Abhay Sreenivas Oka and Justice Krishna Bhat.
2. The Government Advocate submitted a Memo informing the Court that payment of Rs.12,000/- per temple has been provided by the Govt. The Chief Justice has instructed the Govt to state how much of that amount is towards the relief for the Archakas.
3. @ShreehariK submitted that what is paid by the Govt is only a quarter of Rs.48,000/- paid annually by the Govt to each temple towards meeting the annual expenses. J. Krishna Bhat questioned the Govt Advocate as to how they expect temples to meet all expenses with Rs.4000/- p.m
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(