2022: In a bid to show how much his party has changed, Labour leader, Keir Starmer, calls for national service to be brought back.
Thrashed at the local elections, he says "the voters don't trust us yet. I take full responsibility but it's all Corbyn's fault.
2024: In a bid to show how much her party has changed, Labour leader, Yvette Cooper, backs Tory plans to bring back the death penalty.
Thrashed at the general election, she says "the voters don't trust us yet. I take full responsibility but it's all Corbyn's fault".
2029: In a bid to show how much her party has changed, Labour leader, Rachel Reeves, supports Tory plans to privatise the NHS and demands that the welfare state is scrapped.
Thrashed at the general election, she says "the voters don't trust us yet. It's all Corbyn's fault".
2034: With large parts of Britain underwater due to rampaging climate catastrophe, Labour leader, Wes Streeting, wants to show how much the party has changed.
He demands that fossil fuels are brought back and windfarms scrapped.
Labour fall to 4th place at the general election
Ageing political commentators, David Aaronovitch, Dan Hodges and Nick Cohen, all pin the blame on this disaster squarely where it belongs.
On Jeremy Corbyn, of course.
2036: Despite the Labour membership now being in three figures, Lord Mandelson says that the party is clearly on the right track.
2040: Labour ceases to exist and is renamed 'Britain First'. Its new leader, Genghis Khan, is confident that the turning point has been reached.
But he warns assembled journalists that the new party has a mountain to climb. And it's all Corbyn's fault.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"In order to have real adjustment within our personalities, we all want the well‐adjusted life in order to avoid neurosis, or schizophrenic personalities.
But I say to you, my friends, as I move to my conclusion...
... There are certain things in our nation and in the world, (to) which I am proud to be maladjusted, and (to) which I hope all men of goodwill will be maladjusted…
I’m about convinced now that there is need for a new organization in our world.
The International Association for the Advancement of Creative Maladjustment – men and women who will be as maladjusted as the prophet Amos…
As maladjusted as Abraham Lincoln who had the vision to see that this nation would not survive half-slave and half-free…
What do the following electorally successful leaders - left, centre, right - have in common?
- Biden
- Obama
- Ardern
- Sturgeon
- Reagan
- Clinton
- Johnson
- Blair
The answer lies in how they communicate(d) their message: selling a vision by telling a story.
Storytelling is absolutely integral to my methodology as an English teacher. I think we all communicate through stories in many ways - and my aim with students is to get them to build their own stories via videos, images and their own imagination, creativity & critical thinking.
Notice how all eight of the individuals I've listed above define(d) themselves much more by what they were *for* than what they were against. Notice, too, how few - if any - of them ever got that angry at their opponents.
Below, a Newsnight discussion which some of you may remember. I'm posting it because in my view, nothing better encapsulates the cultural divide in Britain - nor why the Tories know they're onto something re: 'the war on woke'.
Starkey is both offensive and terrifyingly prescient. He basically predicts the crumbling of the Red Wall AND Boris Johnson's British exceptionalism.
What did we on the left do? Quite naturally, quite understandably, label him as 'privileged' and pigeonhole him as 'racist'.
There is no way of bridging that divide. These are two colossally different world views on show.
And it's just plain stupid for Labour to even try. We'll never be able to out-Tory the Tories; nor should we even want to.
Thinking about Boris Johnson's success - and like it or not, as a politician (but certainly not as a Prime Minister), he's a quite massive success - prompts me to write something about human nature.
You see: we all *assume* that we want honest, trustworthy, dignified leaders.
Just as we all *assume* that we want honest, trustworthy, socially responsible corporate CEOs.
But we don't get them. And something about human nature indulges this for some reason. Especially when it comes to politics.
John Major, Gordon Brown, Ed Miliband and Jeremy Corbyn are all profoundly decent, honest people. All four got walloped at the ballot box.
Tony Blair, David Cameron and Boris Johnson are anything but honest. All three succeeded at the ballot box.
One of the Corbyn project's biggest failings was that no viable, more charismatic candidate emerged to take his ideas onward. Rebecca Long-Bailey certainly wasn't that figure, sadly.
Look around the Labour Party now. Who actually is there who could replace Starmer and succeed?
I've said before that if Starmer was forced out, I think the Parliamentary Party will likely unite around Yvette Cooper and 'crown' her without a contest.
But she's not popular among the members and too associated with New Labour (and Ed Balls) for the public.
Andy Burnham has just been re-elected as Mayor of Greater Manchester. It'll be four years until he could become an MP again. Too late.
Among the younger generation, Charlotte Nichols and Zarah Sultana aren't ready yet. Maybe Rosena Allin-Khan might be?