What do the following electorally successful leaders - left, centre, right - have in common?

- Biden
- Obama
- Ardern
- Sturgeon
- Reagan
- Clinton
- Johnson
- Blair

The answer lies in how they communicate(d) their message: selling a vision by telling a story.
Storytelling is absolutely integral to my methodology as an English teacher. I think we all communicate through stories in many ways - and my aim with students is to get them to build their own stories via videos, images and their own imagination, creativity & critical thinking.
Notice how all eight of the individuals I've listed above define(d) themselves much more by what they were *for* than what they were against. Notice, too, how few - if any - of them ever got that angry at their opponents.

Left wing rage? It doesn't work.
Overt right wing nastiness? That doesn't work either.

Think about what happened to Theresa May. Who was seen as being both hard headed AND hard hearted - a disastrous combination - and couldn't communicate any message to save her life.
Mostly because she was so palpably uncomfortable in her own skin. Which was also true of Brown, Miliband, Corbyn (at times) and is quite horribly true of Starmer. A rabbit in the headlights. A baby shark that just burped.

Self-confidence and self-assuredness are so so vital.
Heck, they're vital to success in most aspects of life, let alone politics: which is the art of communicating big ideas in a simple, easy to relate to way.
Starmer failed pretty badly in telling a story about the Tories' negligence over Covid - and hasn't even tried to tell the slightest story about what Labour has to offer.

So naturally, the public doesn't think Labour offers anything.
Corbyn came very close to getting it absolutely spot on in 2017... but on set-piece occasions in Parliament or on TV, he too would freeze. Repeatedly.

And at PMQs, at times, he droned on and on so damn much he was like some answer to my tweets.
Miliband was never himself until AFTER he resigned the leadership.

Brown was gaffe prone in a really awkward way - if only he'd laughed at himself (in a way I'm sure he does now: he's a changed and great man), things might've been very different.
Laughing at yourself, being funny... that's maybe the most vital thing of all.

People will forgive almost anything if you make them laugh, don't lecture them and sell a positive vision to them in an engaging way.
In public, how often were Corbyn, Miliband, May or Brown truly funny? Almost never. Major wasn't either. By contrast, Thatcher *was*... very often, never more so than at the despatch box or in conference speeches.

Starmer? A lettuce leaf appears to have more personality.
All of this stuff matters, hugely. The "would you go for a pint with them?" test - a test which, unhappily, Johnson has always passed with flying colours.

I used to do public speaking and debating at school and at uni. And I had a LOT to learn.
The first time I spoke in front of an audience, my whole body was visibly shaking. The second time, I completely ballsed up the summing up; think stand-up comedian who suddenly forgets every word in the English language.

It was like an anxiety dream played out in public.
But with practice and experience, I got better. I'll always remember the day I knew I'd 'cracked it' - that I wasn't scared any more.

And from then on, I just concentrated on being myself. I developed an unusually conversational speaking style.
This was full of jokes at my own expense - I never took myself too seriously - and with engaging with the audience in a soft, gentle way. Not speaking AT them at all.

It amazes me that more politicians, especially on the left, don't cultivate that sort of style.
Don't get me wrong. If I'd ended up in politics, I'm the sort of guy who'd have fallen down the steps of a plane or got photographed getting my lunch down my shirt or got caught short during a speech.

Only a certain kind of person can *do* politics effectively.
But the individuals I mentioned at the start all got it. *Really* got it. And when we talk of how the left must, repeat must, tap into people's emotions and stop talking in such detail about everything, what it comes down to is simple:

Storytelling and comedy.
Comedy, in fact, is by far the best way of dealing with those you disagree with on here.

That's why @MarinaHyde or @JohnJCrace are both national treasures, they're so brilliant... and also why @JimMFelton is the best tweeter on here by a million miles.
It's simple in many ways.

But so, so hard to perfect.
Of course, it's not ALL about being funny. William Hague was absolutely hilarious... but his message was narrow and negative, so the public rejected it. And his opponent towered over him in every way.

But if you can be naturally funny, positive and engaging, it goes a long way.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shaun Lawson

Shaun Lawson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shaunjlawson

9 May
"In order to have real adjustment within our personalities, we all want the well‐adjusted life in order to avoid neurosis, or schizophrenic personalities.

But I say to you, my friends, as I move to my conclusion...
... There are certain things in our nation and in the world, (to) which I am proud to be maladjusted, and (to) which I hope all men of goodwill will be maladjusted…

I’m about convinced now that there is need for a new organization in our world.
The International Association for the Advancement of Creative Maladjustment – men and women who will be as maladjusted as the prophet Amos…

As maladjusted as Abraham Lincoln who had the vision to see that this nation would not survive half-slave and half-free…
Read 6 tweets
9 May
Below, a Newsnight discussion which some of you may remember. I'm posting it because in my view, nothing better encapsulates the cultural divide in Britain - nor why the Tories know they're onto something re: 'the war on woke'.

Starkey is both offensive and terrifyingly prescient. He basically predicts the crumbling of the Red Wall AND Boris Johnson's British exceptionalism.

What did we on the left do? Quite naturally, quite understandably, label him as 'privileged' and pigeonhole him as 'racist'.
There is no way of bridging that divide. These are two colossally different world views on show.

And it's just plain stupid for Labour to even try. We'll never be able to out-Tory the Tories; nor should we even want to.
Read 5 tweets
9 May
As depressing and cynical as British politics so often is, you have to admit that very few electoral systems anywhere allow for stuff like the below.

I've spent the last 10 minutes in tears of mirth just looking at these images. 😂😂😂
Read 8 tweets
8 May
Thinking about Boris Johnson's success - and like it or not, as a politician (but certainly not as a Prime Minister), he's a quite massive success - prompts me to write something about human nature.

You see: we all *assume* that we want honest, trustworthy, dignified leaders.
Just as we all *assume* that we want honest, trustworthy, socially responsible corporate CEOs.

But we don't get them. And something about human nature indulges this for some reason. Especially when it comes to politics.
John Major, Gordon Brown, Ed Miliband and Jeremy Corbyn are all profoundly decent, honest people. All four got walloped at the ballot box.

Tony Blair, David Cameron and Boris Johnson are anything but honest. All three succeeded at the ballot box.

So... why is that?
Read 39 tweets
8 May
One of the Corbyn project's biggest failings was that no viable, more charismatic candidate emerged to take his ideas onward. Rebecca Long-Bailey certainly wasn't that figure, sadly.

Look around the Labour Party now. Who actually is there who could replace Starmer and succeed?
I've said before that if Starmer was forced out, I think the Parliamentary Party will likely unite around Yvette Cooper and 'crown' her without a contest.

But she's not popular among the members and too associated with New Labour (and Ed Balls) for the public.
Andy Burnham has just been re-elected as Mayor of Greater Manchester. It'll be four years until he could become an MP again. Too late.

Among the younger generation, Charlotte Nichols and Zarah Sultana aren't ready yet. Maybe Rosena Allin-Khan might be?
Read 5 tweets
7 May
2022: In a bid to show how much his party has changed, Labour leader, Keir Starmer, calls for national service to be brought back.

Thrashed at the local elections, he says "the voters don't trust us yet. I take full responsibility but it's all Corbyn's fault.
2024: In a bid to show how much her party has changed, Labour leader, Yvette Cooper, backs Tory plans to bring back the death penalty.

Thrashed at the general election, she says "the voters don't trust us yet. I take full responsibility but it's all Corbyn's fault".
2029: In a bid to show how much her party has changed, Labour leader, Rachel Reeves, supports Tory plans to privatise the NHS and demands that the welfare state is scrapped.

Thrashed at the general election, she says "the voters don't trust us yet. It's all Corbyn's fault".
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(