Why Journalists Have Little Credibility When They Quote 'Science!'
What the enclosed paragraphs say about SARS-CoV-2 virus can be said about many other areas of modern research, including Climate Change.
Was SARS-Cov-2 Created in the Wuhan Lab?
At this point there are serious doubts about 'natural emergence' of SARS-Cov-2 virus. Natural emergence seems like a fiction created and promulgated strenuously by China and virologists affiliated with China funded research.
This is why scientists are not always the best judge of societal risks of their work. Work on genetic mutations needs to be guided by a higher level of wisdom than seems to be at work at some of the labs around the world.
Read this for clear clues for what seems likely to have happened in Wuhan Virology Lab.
How do we know what Dr. Shi was working on. We know because she got a research grant, from none other than Dr. Fauci, to work precisely on this.
The lab escape scenario for the origin of the SARS2 virus, as should by now be evident, is not mere hand-waving in the direction of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. It is a detailed proposal, based on the specific project being funded there by Dr. Fauci.
Even if the grant required the work plan described above, how can we be sure that the plan was carried out? For that we can rely on the word of Dr. Daszak, who has been protesting loudly for 15 months that lab escape was a ludicrous conspiracy theory. Conflict of interest?
On 9/12/2019, before coronavirus outbreak became known, Dr. Daszak gave an interview in which he talked glowingly of how researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology had been reprogramming the spike protein and generating coronaviruses capable of infecting humanized mice.
For an example of how money corrupts scientists look no further than Dr. Daszak.
Imprudent Risks
Another reason why scientists take imprudent risks.
Oh. My. Loving. God!
Our government knew more than it has let on till now.
The US Role in Funding the Wuhan Institute of Virology
The director of the NIAID, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and the director of the NIH, Dr. Francis Collins, have a lot of explaining to do, as they funded this research despite a law against doing so.
Maybe Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins know more than they can share, for reasons of national security, but their judgment can be questioned regardless, considering the worldwide toll taken by a virus that could have resulted from the research they funded.
If indeed SARS2 was generated in a lab, here are the players who seem most likely to deserve blame for unleashing this pandemic, in order of culpability. 1. Chinese virologists 2. Chinese authorities 3. The worldwide community of virologists 4. Possibly Dr. Fauci & Dr. Collins
This conclusion seems on point.
Here's an explanation for why there is so little media and Congressional curiosity about the origins of this devastating virus.
And this.
Origin of Covid -- Following The Clues
The best and most thorough article on the origins of SARS-Cov-2 you are likely to read. The above excerpts are all from this article. I am most grateful to Nicholas Wade for writing this. Respect!🙏
a) The unemployment rate rose to 6.1%.
b) Number of open jobs is at an all time high.
How's that possible?
Answer: Government stimulus checks.
When being unemployed pays more than getting a job, is it any wonder many are refusing to join the workforce.
Your Tax Dollars At Work
Government is making economic recovery harder by unwisely spending more money than it should, but will now use the excuse of slow recovery to spend even more money in the name of creating more jobs. Jobs are already there. People aren't filling them.
There are several reasons for the unemployed not going back to work despite an unprecedented level of job openings going unfilled. But this one deserves special attention:
"Employers complain that enhanced unemployment benefits are keeping workers on the sidelines."
For tens of millions of Americans, frustration with the 2020 election and the desire to believe that there was electoral fraud is so high that they can fall easy prey to con artists who prey upon that frustration.
2. There are things we know quite well by now about the 2020 election, things we don't know, and things that are unknowable. Being skeptical is absolutely justified. Being certain is not.
3. Election irregularities by way of questionable rule changes implemented in swing states under questionable authority are well known by now, and are absolutely something that needs to be fixed by state legislatures. Some states are already doing that.
Great.
But it still doesn't prevent fraud in vote-counting centers. If someone drops a 100,000 prefilled ballots into a ballot pile and removes a 100,000 of real filled ballots and throws them away, before ballots are run through a tabulator, a perfect crime has been committed.
By perfect crime I mean there is no way on earth that such a crime can be detected, let alone corrected, no matter how many times you audit the ballots after the above mentioned swap. Why? Because current systems have absolutely no way to detect that such a swap was done.
Until the above loophole is plugged by law, by mandating a barcode (or some other identification mechanism) that ties a counted ballot to the envelope the ballot was mailed in, the potential for undetectable fraud will always exist. No state is fixing this so far.
An Undistorted View Of January 6, 2021
📌Trump did not incite any violence
📌Trump behaved atrociously after the protesters stormed the Capitol and turned violent
📌Democrats and the media concocted a false "insurrection" narrative by blaming unrelated deaths on Capitol rioting
There's a reason most Americans may never get an undistorted version of the history of that day. The minute-by-minute timeline of events is critical for an accurate understanding of what really transpired that day. And no prominent voice seems both willing and able to provide it.
So much happened on January 6, 2021, that with the slightest partisan inclination or bias toward one player or another, any historian can write a deeply heartfelt objective account of that day which will still be completely misleading, if you skip over just a few crucial details.
GOP has a mail-in voting problem. GOP will lose many more elections mindlessly unless it recognizes that mass mail-in voting is here to stay, embraces it wholeheartedly, and fixes what makes it so fraud-prone.
Contd.
2. Republicans: Please stop butting your heads against the wall on broad-scale voting by mail. There is nothing you can do to stop mail-in ballots from being a regular feature of future elections. Nor should you. Mail-in ballots are not the problem. Fraud is. Fix the latter.
3. Accept and welcome mail-in voting. Until Republicans leaders do that, they will have a self-imposed disadvantage against the Democrats that is mindless and hurtful without any redeeming qualities whatsoever. Don't penalize voters for systemic process problems that need fixing.
Census data show a lower black-white turnout disparity in Georgia than in New Jersey.
2. "We have classic voter suppression,” declared Kamala Harris last fall, and Democrats keep making the charge. Yet new Census voting data show these claims are as meritless as what the Democrats refer to as The Big Lie.
3. Census figures released Thursday show that turnout in 2020 reached a near-historic high for a presidential election, with 66.8% of voting-age citizens casting ballots—0.9 percentage-points shy of the 1992 record.