For almost the complete duration of her tenure as Post Office Chief Executive, Paula Vennells and the Post Office board kept information about possible (many now either likely or certain) miscarriages of justice from MPs, campaigners and the courts. In 2015 she told...
... Parliament that the Post Offict had done an investigation and such miscarriages of justice had been surfaced. Also in 2015 the Post Office told Panorama remote access to its Horizon computer system was impossible, a direct untruth. The Post Office, through their...
... Director of Communications Mark Davies (former Spad to Jack Straw) put pressure on media outlets to drop the story. He was good at his job and very successful. Some editors didn't want to run the story, prolonging the agony for victims. Alice Perkins (wife of Jack Straw)...
... was Post Office chairman whilst the cover up was put in place. Interim General Counsel in 2013 was Chris Aujard, replacing Susan Crichton, who left in mysterious circumstances.
Richard Callard, Susannah Storey and Tom Cooper were the government representatives on the...
... Post Office board throughout the cover-up.
None of the above named execs have ever agreed to a media interview about their role in the scandal.
Here's more on the cover-up, which i wrote last year:
... or worked assiduously to enact decisions which kept the truth from MPs, campaigners, the public and the courts.
We need to know what they knew, and when. And we need to know how much the government knew and authorised.
Don't forget when Paula Vennells left the...
... Post Office in 2019, after presiding over the cover-up (and throwing tens of millions of pounds at lawyers to keep it buried), she was given a CBE, a Cabinet Office post and a cushy number chairing an NHS Trust. The government and society REWARDED her.
The Court of Appeal has ruled the Post Office's prosecution of 39 Subpostmasters was an affront to the public conscience. The Post Office fought that element to the end. The cover up has not yet attracted the attention of the courts...
... nor does the government think anyone should be held accountable. If there is not a proper investigation into the what the Post Office and government did, when a decision was clearly taken to hide information relating to criminal convictions from MPs and campaigners...
... then there is something very wrong with the society we live in.
I spent ninety minutes yesterday listening to a couple tell me about their experiences of being prosecuted, which led to one of them being sent to prison for theft. On nothing but IT evidence. His conviction...
... has been quashed but his experience has left them both scarred and impoverished. They've had 20 years of hell, debt and broken careers on the back of a false prosecution. Money won't get that back. Thankfully they are a strong family and have come through. Others...
... weren't so lucky. And the numbers.. christ... if the Post Office really thinks upwards of 585 convictions are unsafe this is evidence of corporate gangsterism on an industrial scale. And yet no on should be held to account...?
Blog post containing calls for a police investigation from a Tory peer updated with this from a leading Subpostmasters’ barrister:
"The Post Office knew from not later than 2013 that its systems were unreliable and...
…. that the Horizon system had the propensity to cause shortfalls not apparent to a Post Office branch terminal operator and that accordingly its evidence to the court in many cases was incomplete and misleading...
… That being so, why did the Post Office adopt the policy of denial...? Who devised that policy of denial and who implemented it?
Holy Moly - Post Office are contacting 540 criminalised Subpostmasters and others whose convictions might be unsafe. Given it prosecuted 736 and 45 have already had their convictions overturned we’re now into slam dunk biggest potential miscarriage of justice ever.
The Post Office legal team in 2013/4 need to be looking at themselves, including Chris Aujard, Rodric Williams (still at the PO) and Jarnail Singh. The CK Sift Review produced clear evidence of a couple of dozen potentially unsafe prosecutions in 2014.
That information was kept SECRET from MPs and the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance. As I said a couple of days back - had that information been given to MPs and campaigners, then hundreds more prosecuted Subpostmasters would at least...
The Post Office kept the Clarke Advice (which advised Gareth Jenkins should no longer be used to give evidence as to the efficacy of Horizon based on the fact he appeared not to have disclosed to the courts bugs he disclosed to Second Sight) secret from...
MPs, campaigners and the public.
The Clarke advice begat the Cartwright King Sift Review which uncovered the possibility that a couple of dozen prosecutions may be unsafe.
This too was kept from MPs, campaigners and the public.
Presumably...
… the reasons why this not disclosed, was because this was privileged information.
I am told there is no privilege in iniquity. Now I’m getting on shaky ground, but bear with...
We are at the Royal Courts of Justice to find out whether 42 Subpostmasters prosecuted by the Post Office will have their criminal convictions quashed. Thread follows...
After a Court Of Appeal hearing in March, three judges will hand down their ruling. 39 appellants are not being opposed by the Post Office.
There were lots of Subpostmasters (and cameras) outside court this morning. It is a glorious day, but...
... it's hard for the appellants to sum up their mood. Many told me they havent slept. Some have been crying yet because many are seeing each other for the first time in a while there are smiles.
Good morning and welcome to Day of R v Hamilton and others at the Court of Appeal. Today we will hear argument for and against the three appellants referred by the CCRC to the court. The Post Office is opposing their appeals. Live-tweet thread to follow.
Yesterday’s court report and all three previous days transcripts can be found here: postofficetrial.com
All my work this week is crowdfunded. If you find any of the stuff of the website useful there is an option to contribute here:
… rewards include a forthcoming book on the scandal and access to the “secret” email - sent on an irregular basis when there are interesting things happening as the story moves through the courts, inquiry and parliament.