1/ Primer on Inhalation Dose

Remember that whether it is via close contact or far field (same indoor space but not close contact) inhalation dose associated with virus laden aerosol particles is defined by the same variables:
Dosei = Ci x B x t x fi

Let's take a closer look.
2/ For aerosol particles (as opposed to actual virions in those particles), Dosei is the number of particles in size range i that are inhaled and deposited in the respiratory system.
3/ These size-fractionated particle numbers can then be converted to size-fractionated particle volume or total volume in different parts of the respiratory system, as we have done with the safeairspaces.com model.
4/ This volume can then be linked to virions if infectious viral load is known or estimated for different particle sizes, or can be anchored to specific outbreaks with use of a dose-response model (as we did with the model described above).
5/ Ci is the concentration of particles in size range i in the breathing zone of the receptor (#/L). It can be substantially reduced using a number of approaches, none of which border on rocket science.
6/ It can be reduced by (a) wearing a mask (Ci is taken as the zone inside the mask), (b) requiring universal mask wearing (to reduce emissions from infectors), (c) increasing ventilation, or (d) utilizing or improving filtration. But there is more.
7/ It can also be reduced by (e) physical distancing (to reduce the near-field component of inhalation dose), or UVGI (upper-room preferred). Note that UVGI leads to inactivation of infectious viruses in aerosol particles as opposed to removing particles from the breathing zone.
8/ UVGI can be highly effective at reducing the “infectiousness” of aerosol particles. Reduction of Ci by (a) and (b) go a long way to reducing dose in BOTH the near- and far fields.
9/ Approaches (c), (d) and UVGI can go a long way to further reduce Ci (or infectious viruses associated with Ci in the case of UVGI) in the far field.
10/ It is possible to reduce inhalation dose by 95% through the right combination of factors that reduce Ci by 95%. That should have been a mantra from the start and throughout this pandemic.
11/ B is the respiratory minute volume (volume of air taken in with each breath) and has units of L/min. This has been an important but overlooked variable throughout the pandemic and can vary by an order of magnitude (and sometimes more) depending on indoor activity.
12/ For example, B is MUCH lower while working at your computer than during aerobic exercise in a gym. An infector with increased B also emits more aerosol particles (potentially a lot more).
13/ Importantly, increasing B by a factor of, say, 6 can lead to a doubling of inhalation dose even if ventilation is increased to reduce Ci by a factor of 3 (which is often not easy). Without that increase in ventilation the inhalation dose would have been much higher.
14/ Definitely avoid non-essential locations where B increases significantly and the space is NOT well ventilated. This will happen in gyms, dance studios, etc.
15/ Unfortunately, it also happens in workplaces where strenuous activities occur indoors. Stressing the fundamentals of inhalation dose and how to reduce it ought to be a focus of employers.
16/ The term t is simply the time spent in a space with an infector (min). This is where human behavior comes into play. Avoid or significantly reduce time spent in non-essential indoor spaces away from home.
17/ The term fi is the fraction of particles in size range i that deposit in the respiratory system and takes on values of less than or equal to 1. The location of where these particles deposit in the respiratory system is relevant.
18/ Our simulations show that for nose breathers the large majority (approximately 70 to 75%) of aerosol particles and particle volume for those particles of relevance to conveyance of SARS-CoV-2 are deposited in the nose and nasopharynx region.
19/ Appreciable (average around 20 to 25%) occurs in the alveolar region. Deposition in the tracheobronchial region is generally less than 10%.
20/ Note that these numbers shift to some extent depending on whether a mask is worn or not; the effectiveness of the mask for removing different particle sizes leads to a shift in the particle size distribution from outside to inside the mask.
21/ Reducing inhalation dose has been key to reducing propagation of COVID-19 throughout this pandemic. Unfortunately, those who had the power to stress this early in the pandemic (and even throughout) failed. But this virus is not done killing. Keep pushing to save lives.
22/ So, to summarize, reduce Ci by wearing a mask and requiring universal mask wearing in indoor spaces where it cannot be confirmed with certainty that 100% of occupants have been fully vaccinated, increase ventilation, use improved central filtration and/or ...
23/ portable HEPA filtration, and consider use of upper-room UVGI if possible. Avoid spaces with others where your respiratory minute volume, or that of others, is elevated. Minimize time in non-essential indoor spaces.
24/ This was all true at the beginning of the pandemic. It has been true throughout. It is true today. More information is provided in my August 2020 blog entitled The Dose Makes the (risk of) Infection. corsiaq.com.
25/ Keep your guard up. Stay focused on reducing inhalation dose. Know those factors that will help you do so. Teach others.

And, of course, Just Do It!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Richard Corsi

Dr. Richard Corsi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CorsIAQ

8 May
1/ I have been asked extensively during interviews and by the public about my own personal decisions during this pandemic. I never answer questions like "which air cleaner should I buy?" but do give guidance on those that are proven and what to look for. Some examples.
2/ Do you use a mask outdoors?
From the start of the pandemic I have carried a mask with me when I go outdoors but only wear it if it appears I might come in close contact with someone. This is perhaps 5% of the time. I have avoided crowds for the past 15 months.
3/ Do you have a portable air cleaner in your home?
Yes, we have two very good portable HEPA air cleaners (each with CADR greater than 300 scfm). We purchased these long before the pandemic.
Read 18 tweets
8 May
1/ Excellent article by @zeynep. My take below ...

Why Did It Take So Long to Accept the Facts About Covid? nytimes.com/2021/05/07/opi…
2/ At the start of this pandemic transmission by direct contact, close contact via LARGE respiratory droplets, & fomites were emphasized. ...
3/ Airborne transmission by aerosol particles (in near or far fields) was ignored & even downplayed by @WHO and @CDC, despite the fact this pathway represented THE nightmare scenario. This effectively opened the gate for THE nightmare scenario to occur.
Read 12 tweets
1 May
1/ Simple answer = very little for aerosol particles but possibly (in some cases) dispersion that reduces close contact dose. But depending on flow conditions, there can be a low pressure zone on the downstream side that leads to some accumulation of particles.
2/ The risk of people letting their guards down thinking that barriers are somehow effective for aerosol particles is much greater than any benefit, IMHO. Technical answer next.
3/ Is there a benefit in terms of far field exposure? Very minimal. Here's why. Indoor aerosol particle decay rates (k) to (integrated) indoor surfaces range from approx 0.2 to 10/hr for 0.3 to 10 um particles, respectively (higher for larger diameter particles).
Read 9 tweets
24 Apr
1/ Inhalation dose occurs in both the near field (close contact) and far field in the same indoor space. It is reasonable to assume that near field concentrations in the breathing zone are < 2 to 8 x the far field based on measurements & modeling.
2/ The actual magnifier depends on distance, whether and type of masks worn, mixing conditions (TKE) between infector and receptor, mode of emissions (cough vs. speak vs. breath), body orientation of infector & receptor and controls in the far field.
3/ Assuming the magnifier is 4 x, then 15 minutes in close contact with an infector is the same as 60 minutes in the far field. In each case the dose is the same and the probability of infection from those doses should be the same.
Read 7 tweets
18 Apr
1/ From 2008 to 2010 I was honored to hold the Otto Mønsted Visiting Professorship at the Technical University of Denmark. @WargockiPawel was a wonderful host, shown here in a moment of utter coolness.
2/ I also had the good fortune to overlap one of my visits with @CJWeschler, @LouiseBWeschler, & Bill Nazaroff. Charlie, Bill & I gave a trio lecture by the "Three Amigos". Photo courtesy of @LouiseBWeschler.
3/ Two of my PhD students (Erin Darling & Clement Cros) @ut_caee visited & we did expts related to perceived air quality using human panels exposed to a number of polluted & clean air streams flowing over clay-based plaster. Remarkably positive impressions of clay-treated air.
Read 4 tweets
6 Apr
1/ Outdoor education. This time of year and for the next two months many schools have an opportunity to have some class periods outdoors (weather, space, and local conditions permitting). Do it if you can.
2/ A very nice whiteboard on wheels costs roughly the same as an XLNT HEPA filtration system on wheels, about 2 Grande Frappuccinos per student per yr for a class of 25 students. An investment of $10/student for each is small given$15K cost of educating 1 student/yr in US.
3/ I used to occasionally teach outdoors as a faculty member at the U of Texas at Austin on nice fall and spring days. Students would bring towels to sit on. It was a wonderful way to teach, and the students seemed to like it as well.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(