One of the things that Eric, the former 343i artist, says in the video is that gaming news sites ran the story without reaching out to him first. Even when he reached out to sites / channels to try and clarify, no one responded.
Unfortunately that's how it goes a lot of the time
Professional outlets reporting on a video in Mandarin via a poorly translated forum post is never a good idea. It should be obvious that reaching out would be the first thing to do.
There are plenty of sites that actually do reach out of course and only a minority that don't.
But unfortunately it's still easy for misinformation to spread if one notable site reports on it and then other sites use that one site as a source. Which is what happened in the case above.
I get that the incentive to be first and drive traffic is a management issue though.
People reach out to me for comments / clarity all the time, which is great. But there have also been plenty of times where a random tweet of mine will end up on a website with all context removed + it's been poorly interpreted.
Reaching out saves that headache of corrections.
Also if you're going to use this tweet thread to be like "It's only because every journalist hates Xbox"
Like.. go outside ffs
Also if you're going to use this tweet thread to be like "This is why all journalism sucks and i'm going to send them death threats now"
You also suck and should get help.
Can't believe I have to clarify these two points. But I don't want to leave room for ambiguity here.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was quoted in this @washingtonpost article about Xbox's gaming business.
Microsoft said at the Apple v Epic trial that it has never generated a profit from hardware. While this is true, the company does generate a profit from software and services.
FY20/21 was a record year for Nintendo. The stay-at-home period led to an increasing in gaming engagement and spend across the board, as people turned to virtual worlds to stay connected with friends while the real world was off limits.
PUBG Mobile was the #1 most downloaded game in India and the #1 mobile game by revenue at the time. It had a growing esports scene in the country and was essentially responsible for driving overall growth of mobile gaming.
I think there are some really good parts that capture the spirit of the IP, especially in the second half of the movie.
But a lot of that is undone by a weak script, some questionable casting decisions and not great acting.
1/
The storyline focuses on the Yellow Turban Rebellion period to the Fall of Dong Zhuo.
The movie tries to mix in a traditional Romance of the Three Kingdoms drama / movie, with the action of Dynasty Warriors.
I do agree that it doesn't do either all that well ultimately.
I think the biggest issue is that there are parts in the movie where the story is neither from the original ROTK novel, or the Dynasty Warriors IP. It was just added to try and explain things, but doesn't do it justice.
There are also parts that are skipped over entirely.
The console is sold at a loss initially & usually for some time after
The platform holder recoups the investment in hardware via its own first party game sales + services + the cut it takes from third parties that sell games / DLC