I feel it is very misleading for anyone to discuss the GOP's current "audits" without mentioning every single time that,
(a) Beginning in 2000, the GOP has blocked all efforts to assess the legitimacy of poll-defying Republican victories; ... 1/
(b) The GOP also blocked the SAFE Act election-security bill, which would have required Risk Limiting Audits for all federal races in 2020, including the GOP's unexpected sweep of "tossup" House races and poll-defying Senate victories in Maine and NC... 2/
The Republican party leadership has shown a willingness to lie and distort the truth on election integrity (eg., vulnerabilities = proof "Trump won," the myth of mass voter fraud, the "intelligence expert" who wasn't an intelligence expert, ... 3/
... the intelligence contractor who was a pro-Trump podcaster, swapping Minnesota data with Michigan data, Dominion = ES&S, Dominion = Smartmatic, "we are the election-security victims even though we blocked election security legislation"). 4/
There are objective reasons to doubt their good faith, which is crucial context. Ignoring that does not bring us closer to election integrity. Cherry-picking which races and vendor to audit will never give a clear picture of the integrity of the election overall. TY. 5/
How the election-fraud myth was spread by Russell Ramsland and the Texas security company ASOG - Washington Post 1/ washingtonpost.com/investigations…
2/ Ramsland collaborated for a time w/ election-security advocate Laura Presley, a Republican, who says “she believes he has not provided evidence for his claims about the 2020 election & fears those claims could undercut legitimate questions about the integrity of U.S. voting.”
“Depressingly, the Obama admin decided to keep a lid on most of what it knew so as not to undermine the public's confidence in the integrity of the election, even though those same people..knew that the integrity of the election was...up for grabs.” 1/ esquire.com/news-politics/…
“Illinois became Patient Zero in the government's probe, eventually leading investigators to a hacking pandemic that touched four out of every five U.S. states.” 2/
“Using evidence from the Illinois computer banks, federal agents were able to develop digital "signatures" -- among them, Internet Protocol addresses used by the attackers -- to spot the hackers at work.” 3/
“Opinion | Stephanie Murphy: Why is the Russian medding in 2016 such a big secret? I’m not allowed to say. - The Washington Post” - 9/3/19 by @RepStephMurphy 1/ washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-i…
“The fact that Florida’s election infrastructure was specifically — and successfully — targeted wasn’t made public until about three years after the fact, when a single sentence deep in the Mueller report revealed Russia had breached “at least one” county in the state.” 2/
According to Mueller’s report, the “GRU sought to infiltrate computer networks involved in the administration of elections, which could enable Russia to alter voter registration databases or perhaps vote tabulation systems.” 3/
"Use it or lose it" voter purges in GA & OH assume u must have moved or died if u miss a few elections & don't return a postcard. Why don't they just check the USPS notice of change of address list and ERIC? Because voter suppression... By the ABA americanbar.org/groups/crsj/pu…
"There is every reason to be concerned that this practice continues because it has a political skewing effect. Failure to vote regularly correlates with lower socioeconomic status and, at least in some places, with being a member of a racial minority."
The #fraudit gives me extreme cognitive dissonance bc Ds shld demanded to do what Rs are doing (minus the bamboo shreds, etc). It is inside out. It was Rs that blocked efforts to require meaningful manual audits for all federal races. It is Ds who suffered poll-defying losses. 1/
It’s almost too much to deal with. It is so infuriating. Why can’t there be a happy medium between complete abdication (Democrats) and insurrection (Republicans)? 2/ axios.com/gop-senator-el…
The GOP got away with it for 15 years bc anyone who says they suspect cheating is called tin foil since they can’t prove it. Check mate. That said, a federal court held in 2018 that GA’s paperless voting machines were unconstitutional. It’s why GA had to move to paper. 1/
It didn’t help that some Democrats have gone along with the paperless voting machine scam. Georgia had a Democratic SOS when it became the first state to deploy touchscreen machines statewide. That year, the state lurched to the right. 2/
Some Ds in Congress voted against paper, including Steny Hoyer & Chris Dodd. The Rs who pushed paperless machines were Mitch McConnell and Bob Ney. 3/