I am tired of people who have spent most or all of their life on the West Coast telling me about what's East Coast.
Especially when what they really mean is LA versus NY. Even then they aren't right.
Somehow they forget the East Coast includes New England, Florida, and the Carolinas (for starters), and that the West Coast includes the Pacific NW (no word on Alaska and Hawaii).
Where's Arizona's coast? Yuma? Silence.
This came up with the term BBQ/barbecue/barbeque.
I said the words (as spoken) could mean a number of things, including nouns and verbs.
Oh no, said the self-pronounced authorities hailing from the West Coast, at least in their imagination.
It is a means of food preparation, they insisted. It was never a sandwich. Or an event. Or the device used to prepare food.
Let's not even go into the multiple renderings of the word and why that's important.
Pointing out that there were different BBQ sandwiches/sauces/regional names for various versions (Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, and KC, to name a few) was useless, as was my attempt to remind the geographically-challenged that many of these places were not "East Coast."
This is nothing more than southern California-inspired cancel culinary culture that is ironically very unwoke.
Such intolerance for diversity should not be allowed to go unchallenged. The word as spoken is a noun, a verb, and an adjective, depending on context and purpose.
Note: this discussion was limited to sandwiches. You don't think I would expand it to ribs or anything else, would you? Nor did I mention the word grill in any of its contexts.
Baby steps.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, to answer my own question posed yesterday: Robert E. Lee had more impact on the outcome of the American Civil War than did any other Confederate military leader.
I'm sure you're wondering why I think that.
1. Lee's overlooked work on the South Atlantic coastal defenses brought to a halt already hesitant US efforts to exploit the landings of November 1861. Imagine the implications of a more active front along the coast into the interior.
2. Lee's support of Stonewall Jackson's Valley campaign in 1862 proved a sufficient deterrent to US efforts to unite on Richmond. Lee got Jackson to live rent-free in Yankee heads.
So many answers to my query yesterday were Gettysburg-centric that it is worth reminding people that the notion that Gettysburg was the turning point of the war is a romantic exercise and reflects interesting assumptions about the Confederacy.
For one thing, Union victory at Gettysburg simply preserved the strategic stalemate in the Eastern theater. Both sides were winning on home turf. That would change during the decidedly unromantic Overland Campaign.
Second, we keep on asking how Lee lost at Gettysburg. I think George G. Meade and the Army of the Potomac won the battle.
Ulysses S. Grant, May 6, 1864, in the Wilderness, Virginia, upon hearing an excited officer declare that he knew what Lee would do next after the Confederates launched an attack at dusk:
It had been a rough two days for the general-in-chief. One of his West Point classmates, Alexander Hays, had been killed on May 5. Grant was shaken when he heard the news.
Hays had graduated a year after Grant. Here is an image of the two men (Hays is in the foreground):
Hays's death meant that there was one less friendly face for Grant in the Army of the Potomac, and there were not many (although he knew Winfield Scott Hancock, among others).
Hancock had opened the fighting on May 6 by attacking Lee's right. The attack was initially successful.
This is one of the most interesting (and sometimes misunderstood) images of Ulysses S. Grant on the afternoon of May 5, 1864.
It presents Grant whittling away with a knife at his headquarters as the Army of the Potomac swung into action against Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia (Burnside's separate IX Corps would be up later).
Some people interpret this as a man whittling away without a care in the world: a sign of the calm, imperturbable Grant.
William McFeely saw it as potentially mindless, even insensitive to the carnage around him.
The refounding of the American republic in 1787-88 was made possible by major concessions to southern slaveholding interests. The three-fifths rule gave the South artificial advantages in the House and the electoral college.
It was no accident that the presidency and the Supreme Court were bulwarks of the slave power, along with the desire to maintain a free state-slave state balance in the Senate.
Three other early safeguards eventually cracked.
1. The House eventually reflected population growth in the North and the West, allowing free states to control the House.
No surprise to see Republicans who dismissed stories of Donald Trump's harrassing women jump on the allegations against Andrew Cuomo.
No surprise to see Democrats who welcomed charges against Republicans urge that we need to investigate before believing charges against Cuomo.
We'll hear a lot about motives (especially partisan ones) and a renewed debate on how we should initially treat allegations and view the people who make them.
None of this was hard to predict.
This will become a political football. and that means that larger issues will be obscured.
Sexual harassment is wrong, period. It's not boys just being boys, and it isn't always boys doing it or women being targeted.