The number of families processed at the border under normal immigration law (and not expelled with no chance to seek asylum) continues to be much lower than 2019.
Last month 36% of all families arriving at the border were expelled back to Mexico.
One note on the expulsion of families. CBP has quietly made a major change to March's data on Title 42 expulsions—and families in particular.
CBP is now reporting over 4,000 additional expulsions of families, meaning 40% of families were expelled in March, not 33%.
The total number of expulsions carried out by CBP increased again last month. Last month, only 36.61% of people encountered at the border were not subject to an expulsion under Title 42, down almost imperceptibly from 36.71% in March (using the newly corrected numbers).
The number of unaccompanied children apprehended after crossing the border between ports of entry fell 9.6% from March to April, despite predictions that it would instead rise significantly. Daily data released by DHS shows that this downward trend is continuing into May as well.
One other interesting thing I'll flag tonight: we are actually seeing the Biden administration allow families to seek asylum at ports of entry.
The below is a chart showing members of a family being allowed to seek asylum at ports of entry. It is slooooowly going back up.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
CBP routinely, as a matter of general practice, takes peoples' belongings (including phones) and throws them all in the trash, except for "valuables" they let people keep.
All of that is against policy yet they just keep doing it. And it leads to things like this. 👇
In 2019, the DHS Office of Inspector General documented CBP throwing away everyone's belongings except for valuables—including this doll and a little girl's backpack.
CBP's explanation? The "items might be wet, have
bugs, and be muddy, and, therefore, presented a 'biohazard.'"
Not all phones are thrown out, and sometimes people do get them back. But it is inconsistent.
CBP also tosses peoples' medication in the trash as a matter of policy, because it wasn't prescribed in the US. But if people are only held for a few hours, that can be dangerous.
Yep, another good day of numbers on migrant children for the Biden administration. Yesterday hit a record low for unaccompanied children encountered at the border and the overall number of children in government custody dropped by 1,421 since one week ago. The trend line is good!
For reasons that are not entirely clear, the number of unaccompanied children coming to the border has been falling steadily for weeks after peaking in late March.
Numbers are still higher than 2019 but they keep falling. All those who predicted a peak in May were wrong.
Meanwhile, the Biden administration continues to succeed at ramping up ORR's capacity to release children to their sponsors.
This week starts with the highest total for a Sunday since they began reporting numbers in late March. Every week has seen an overall capacity increase.
Some really interesting stuff here. Once again shows that CBP’s dire predictions about numbers are not coming true, which has given the Biden administration more breathing room.
Man, this list of reasons specific DOD sites were deemed not viable to hold migrant children is fascinating.
Good thread about today's announcement of new immigration judges. And I've got another thing to flag.
6 will go to a brand new "Richmond Immigration Adjudication Center," an office building where the public isn't allowed and judges appear by video in hearings around the country.
This the third so-called "Immigration Adjudication Center," with the other two in Falls Church, VA and Fort Worth, TX.
Judges in these centers will order thousands of people deported without every having to look someone directly in the face. It's all done through video.
The EOIR Director under Trump, James McHenry, seemingly wanted an immigration court system that operates like Social Security (judges all appearing via video), rather than a traditional courtroom with everyone in one place.
Today's announcement is likely a result of that push.
"Asylum Cooperative Agreements" are a form of "Safe Third Country" agreement, a concept in US law where someone can be denied the right to ask for asylum if they can be sent to a country where they won't face persecution and which provides "a full and fair" chance to seek asylum.
The "safe third country" concept was created by Congress in 1996, and until 2019 only one such agreement existed.
The US-Canada STC Agreement took years to negotiate, is very limited, provides numerous exceptions, and imposes obligations on both sides. canada.ca/en/immigration…
Public ICE data posted online shows that there were 3,316 ICE deportations from March 28 through April 24, so I'm having a hard time squaring that with this line in @NickMiroff's piece. There are clearly two conflicting data sources right now.
ICE data is always a bit wonky, but from the data ICE publishes online removals have indeed dropped but didn't go below 3,000 for April, as the Post story suggests.
Anyway, to be clear, I'm only quibbling with the exact numbers provided in the story from the ICE sources, not the overall thrust of the story, which is indeed supported by the data! This is me griping about ICE data, a personal pet peeve. Messy government data is frustrating!