I'd never heard of this particular dude before, but the overall outlines of this narrative, "I converted to Catholicism as an adult and now think the US should be run as a Catholic theocratic dictatorship" are oddly common thedailybeast.com/new-york-post-…
“My moral opinions were as interchangeable as my clothing styles and musical tastes,” the 36-year-old Ahmari [..] writes in his latest book, The Unbroken Thread: Discovering the Wisdom of Tradition in an Age of Chaos."
Well, guess what, dude, my moral opinions have been pretty solid since I was a little kid, and I'm older than you, and I say "traditional" patriarchal religions can suck it.
It's so weird how conservatives keep discovering and rediscovering the same ultimate secret to life: "just do what WE say"
I don't know if these neo-traditionalists KNOW they're being deceptive, or if they are themselves sincerely deceived, but the idea that you can "redeem" a fallen secular world by returning to some reactionary point in the past is pure fascist fantasy.
Most people know by now, I thought, that there was never *actually* a point in history where people didn't *have* "unauthorized" sex, there were just points in history where there was a lot of social and legal pressure to pretend otherwise.
Authoritarians ACT like they want that perfectly ordered world where everyone is in their proper place and behaving properly, which is bad enough, but you never GET that because people, under any system, remain people.
Authoritarian states aren't more well-behaved, they're simply more deceptive and fearful. They encourage distrust, alienation and cruelty. And they're very inefficient. There's no good there. Absolutely none.
And... looking at his other recent controversial opinions, the common thread isn't "Jesus is great" but rather, "authoritarian states are great, my fave flavor right now is Catholic but I do enjoy others."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reading this, what you see is the inevitable evangelical urge to make sure leavers and critics never get to define themselves, give their own reasons, and have that stand as the narrative.
"They SAY they're leaving for [x] reasons but we don't like those reasons... what if they're just mad at God?"
"To publicly denounce a particular congregation, not to mention a particular denomination (not to mention an entire faith tradition), because of how people behaved is to misunderstand what Christianity is."
But what is Christianity, if it's not made up of Christians?
BEHOLD MY AWESOME POWER
I AM THE FLAME AND THE DARKNESS
ALL SHALL LOVE ME AND DESPAIR
He's not even wrong, I DO hate all those things, because I know that all those things are examples of patriarchy, and I hate patriarchy.
"Creation order" == patriarchy
"Biblical manhood" == patriarchy
"God-centered family" == patriarchy
It's so peculiar
I've been a feminist since the early 70s and that entire time I've heard that "feminists" devalue traditional "women's work" of domestic service and childcare
I've almost never seen any actual feminists do this, mind you, I've only seen anti-feminists insist that feminists do this.
So, you know, I never wanted to be one of those *bad feminists* so I was always very conscious making sure I wasn't *disrespecting* stay-at-home-moms or their work.
I mean, until I was an adolescent I HAD such a mom, right? I didn't want to disrespect my OWN mom.
This is an absolute pet peeve of mine: the framing of every single thing that happens regarding sex, sex roles, reproduction, etc. as 100% the result of a 100% free choice made by a woman who apparently exists in a frictionless vacuum --
Like, somebody *advocating for the inherent superiority of the 1950s-style patriarchal nuclear family* still acts like there's not a man involved.
Does he even want kids? Does he have a job that would comfortably pay all the family's bills if his wife doesn't work?
How stable is his employment situation? Does his job provide healthcare? Does the couple want to live geographically near one of the sets of grandparents or any other extended family, and how does that affect their job/housing choices?
First, the concept of "sin" -- a vague & slippery concept which has no meaning outside of a religious context.
Because "sin" is more or less *defined* as an offense against God, while "abuse" is an offense against other people, "crime" is an offense against law, etc.
I think Christians -- especially conservative, purity-culture Christians -- often deliberately use "sin" interchangeably with other descriptions of "bad behavior" & it's done for a deceptive, evil purpose --
Well worth reading.
Interesting quote from the Traitor, Franklin Graham, "Christian nationalism doesn’t exist [it's] just another name to throw at Christians. [..] The left is very good at calling people names.”
The same people who claim "America is a Christian nation" claim "Christian nationalism doesn't exist"
“The greatest ethnic dog whistle the right has ever come up with is ‘Christian,’ because it means ‘people like us,’ it means white.”
--Samuel Perry, sociologist at the University of Oklahoma