Reading this, what you see is the inevitable evangelical urge to make sure leavers and critics never get to define themselves, give their own reasons, and have that stand as the narrative.
"They SAY they're leaving for [x] reasons but we don't like those reasons... what if they're just mad at God?"
"To publicly denounce a particular congregation, not to mention a particular denomination (not to mention an entire faith tradition), because of how people behaved is to misunderstand what Christianity is."

But what is Christianity, if it's not made up of Christians?
"Claims of who Jesus is and what Christianity teaches must be evaluated on their own merit, but many churches have failed to prepare young people to do this."

Untrue.
What churches failed to do was provide was satisfactory answers.
This argument seems very familiar:
"if only you understood Christianity *correctly* you'd have no choice *other* than to believe!"
And the answer is nope
Nope in two ways.
The first nope, is, there's nothing inevitable about Christianity.
Some people just don't believe because they don't, and you have to respect that. You won't, but you should. There's no apologetics you can supply that will change their minds, you need to let it go.
The second nope is that very evangelical notion of the Platonic church that exists but doesn't exist -- that if only you understood the *real* church, the holy church, the church that isn't found here on this earth, you wouldn't be leaving... the one found here on this earth.
You see how that doesn't make any sense?

I mean, if you're going to say "well, it's all about you and your *personal* relationship with Jesus" then I'm going to say, "great, then what do I need *your* church for then?"
If it really is just about me & Jesus, well, I can relate to Jesus all on my own, over here, without the rest of you jerks.
"Considering these two factors makes me wonder if “leavers” who blame people in the Church for their own leaving are in reality just upset with God. "

Here, let me save you some trouble: no. The answer is no. They're not "just upset with God"
I can't say this too many times, apparently, because evangelicals will never listen: nobody in the world sees your God, your Jesus, they just see YOU.

The church is YOU.

When people reject your God, they're rejecting YOU.

Maybe that hurts, but it's the truth.
"So many [..] begin by lamenting the bad behavior of fellow churchgoers end up rejecting the Bible’s moral claims about sexuality,"

No.
They're rejecting YOUR claims about sexuality.
Stop hiding behind the Bible, cowards.
"The more that the wider culture finds Christian teaching outdated and outrageous, the harder it is to distinguish between the various motivations of those who leave the church, and/or the faith."

It's not hard at all, actually, you just find it hard to hear.
You built a church for yourselves, for your own purposes, your own comfort, and now people are leaving, and it drives you crazy that you can't do anything about it, so you do what you can: you lie to yourselves about WHY they're leaving.
The crazy thing is that I was already here, like, thirty years ago, having this same argument with my own family. '
"Why do you want to leave?"
"Well, I have these concerns -- "
"Is it sex? It's sex, isn't it."
"That's only part of it, I question --"
"I KNEW IT, IT'S SEX"
I mean, surely, you've NOTICED that your insistence on "Biblical morality" only seems to apply to women & LGBTQ people, patriarchs in good standing like Josh Duggar or Donald Trump get away with any kind of abuse --

And even if YOU haven't noticed, WE noticed.
Did you really think you could just say "our hypocrisies aren't important, it's all about Jesus" and we would have to accept that?
And it's weird, because you'd think after thirty years I wouldn't care, but it still galls me to have church-apologizers speak for me, tell the world that they understand my religious feelings more clearly than I do.
And I guess that's the end, for now.

But these things never seem to end, do they?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with McJulie is writing the next book

McJulie is writing the next book Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mcjulie

12 May
I'd never heard of this particular dude before, but the overall outlines of this narrative, "I converted to Catholicism as an adult and now think the US should be run as a Catholic theocratic dictatorship" are oddly common thedailybeast.com/new-york-post-…
“My moral opinions were as interchangeable as my clothing styles and musical tastes,” the 36-year-old Ahmari [..] writes in his latest book, The Unbroken Thread: Discovering the Wisdom of Tradition in an Age of Chaos."
Well, guess what, dude, my moral opinions have been pretty solid since I was a little kid, and I'm older than you, and I say "traditional" patriarchal religions can suck it.
Read 9 tweets
11 May
Dudes like this always make people like me sound so badass.

I AM A PRINCIPALITIES AND POWERS
I HATE CREATION ORDER
I HATE BIBLICAL MANHOOD
I AM HERE TO ATTACK AND DETHRONE GOD
BEHOLD MY AWESOME POWER
I AM THE FLAME AND THE DARKNESS
ALL SHALL LOVE ME AND DESPAIR
He's not even wrong, I DO hate all those things, because I know that all those things are examples of patriarchy, and I hate patriarchy.
"Creation order" == patriarchy
"Biblical manhood" == patriarchy
"God-centered family" == patriarchy
Read 6 tweets
11 May
It's so peculiar
I've been a feminist since the early 70s and that entire time I've heard that "feminists" devalue traditional "women's work" of domestic service and childcare
I've almost never seen any actual feminists do this, mind you, I've only seen anti-feminists insist that feminists do this.
So, you know, I never wanted to be one of those *bad feminists* so I was always very conscious making sure I wasn't *disrespecting* stay-at-home-moms or their work.

I mean, until I was an adolescent I HAD such a mom, right? I didn't want to disrespect my OWN mom.
Read 9 tweets
10 May
This is an absolute pet peeve of mine: the framing of every single thing that happens regarding sex, sex roles, reproduction, etc. as 100% the result of a 100% free choice made by a woman who apparently exists in a frictionless vacuum --
Like, somebody *advocating for the inherent superiority of the 1950s-style patriarchal nuclear family* still acts like there's not a man involved.

Does he even want kids? Does he have a job that would comfortably pay all the family's bills if his wife doesn't work?
How stable is his employment situation? Does his job provide healthcare? Does the couple want to live geographically near one of the sets of grandparents or any other extended family, and how does that affect their job/housing choices?
Read 5 tweets
10 May
This is an interesting discussion, and it prompted me to want to clarify something --
First, the concept of "sin" -- a vague & slippery concept which has no meaning outside of a religious context.

Because "sin" is more or less *defined* as an offense against God, while "abuse" is an offense against other people, "crime" is an offense against law, etc.
I think Christians -- especially conservative, purity-culture Christians -- often deliberately use "sin" interchangeably with other descriptions of "bad behavior" & it's done for a deceptive, evil purpose --
Read 12 tweets
9 May
Well worth reading.
Interesting quote from the Traitor, Franklin Graham, "Christian nationalism doesn’t exist [it's] just another name to throw at Christians. [..] The left is very good at calling people names.”
The same people who claim "America is a Christian nation" claim "Christian nationalism doesn't exist"
“The greatest ethnic dog whistle the right has ever come up with is ‘Christian,’ because it means ‘people like us,’ it means white.”
--Samuel Perry, sociologist at the University of Oklahoma
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(