"there is no evidence …that would indicate that Google has any plans to favour its own over third-party apps"
"there is no evidence that Google plans …to lower prices below costs"
Things Google would never do.
The EU's full G/Fitbit decision is out:
ec.europa.eu/competition/me…
"there is no evidence that Google plans …to lower prices below costs"
Things Google would never do.
The EU's full G/Fitbit decision is out:
ec.europa.eu/competition/me…
"Google would neither have the ability nor the incentives to discriminate in favour of Fitbit in Google Search results"
Disclaimer, those are just random statements that caught my eye. Also:
"it remains purely speculative whether the merged entity will indeed be successful…"
Disclaimer, those are just random statements that caught my eye. Also:
"it remains purely speculative whether the merged entity will indeed be successful…"
The term "insurance" is mentioned only twice in the full text of the 254p decision, and four times in the footnotes.
The Commission identified (only) the following four markets in 'digital healthcare' and, as of today, the acquisition does not affect any of them.
The Commission identified (only) the following four markets in 'digital healthcare' and, as of today, the acquisition does not affect any of them.
"There is no evidence that the conclusion of [agreements with insurers and/or health providers] would become materially more likely as a consequence of the Transaction. The Commission therefore considers that this concern is not merger-specific"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
