Update. It seems that Argyle, who claims to have access to records on employment and work activities of 40 million workers, has created sites named "Workers United" or "Wage Compete" to phish user credentials of Fortune 500 companies to gain access to their payroll/HR systems.
As this thread by Kevin Beaumont shows, a range of shady websites offered $100 to $500 to workers who provide their credentials:
"By proceeding you're agreeing to Argyle's Legal Terms"
"Reverse engineering knowledge"

"Knowledge of bot and captcha bypass mitigation tactics"

"familiar with Android/iOS device verification frameworks ... and ways to bypass them"

This job posting suggests they are building scrapers to harvest worker data:
argyle.rippling-ats.com/job/219736/sof…
I guess, they use the credentials to gain initial access to the affected HR systems to develop crawlers that are able to continuously harvest data from those systems.

Do all those companies know that Argyle accesses - or claims to access - their systems?
argyle.com/coverage
Gridwise, an app that claims to be the "ultimate rideshare and delivery assistant", is selling "millions of anonymized [?] location, trip, and earnings records from ride-hail and delivery drivers" and it seems to utilize Argyle.
gridwise.io/analytics
gridwise.io/termsofservice
Gridwise is selling gig mobility data so that companies can "make better operational, investment, and strategic decisions".

Not exactly what a worker's "assistant" should do.
gridwise.io/analytics
Actually, Argyle is often listed as a startup from Lithuania, and btw. its co-founder and CTO was 'National Representative of Lithuania' at the 'NATO STO IST Panel', according to LinkedIn.

/cc Lithuanian data protection authority
map.startuplithuania.lt/companies/argy…
sifted.eu/lithuanian-sta…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wolfie Christl

Wolfie Christl Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WolfieChristl

28 Apr
"FB is seeking 230 immunity ... to discriminate based on age/gender when deciding which financial ads to show users"

Thread:
I guess, discrete targeting based on age and gender is just the tip of the iceberg as compared to Facebook's ML-based targeting/optimization stuff.

The best way to fix the latter is to ban FB (and G) from utilizing comprehensive real-time behavioral data for automated targeting.
In other news today:

"Facebook allowed ... to target children with ads on gambling, alcohol and extreme weight loss"
theguardian.com/technology/202…
Read 7 tweets
21 Apr
Final version of the European Commission's proposal for an AI regulation:
digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/pro…

Eventually, the three main EU bodies (council, parliament and commission) will have to agree on a common version of the text #lobbyingwar #kickoff
"Many of the most harmful uses are not prohibited - like predictive policing, uses of AI for migration control, biometric categorisation"

Thread by EDRi's @sarahchander and @ellajakubowska1 addressing problems from a civil/digital rights perspective:
Most "systems that could inflict serious economic harm are treated negligently. Strikingly the proposal ignores most economic harms", and "the ban of #DarkPatterns ... has largely disappeared".

Problems from a consumer protection perspective:
Read 4 tweets
20 Apr
"Obviously Brussels is full of lobbyists, think tanks and people who never disclose that they are working for the companies. The gatekeepers are the law firms"

Interview with @TomValletti, former chief economist at the European Commission: thecounterbalance.substack.com/p/the-european…
"The GAFAM (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft) have acquired more than 1,000 firms in the past 20 years, and zero of those transactions have been blocked - and 97 percent were not even assessed by anybody. These are extreme, ridiculous numbers"
"these think tanks, like the Global Antitrust Institute [at George Mason University], and the International Centre for Law & Economics, they are funded by the Koch brothers, by the Googles and the Facebooks, they don’t disclose, and they basically brainwash generations of judges"
Read 6 tweets
18 Apr
Zalando setzt für 5000 Beschäftigte ein Ratingsystem ein, bei dem sich alle gegenseitig bewerten und dann als Low/Good/Top Performer eingestuft werden.

Die Berliner Datenschutzbehörde hat das System laut Jahresbericht nach Änderungen für zulässig erklärt.
datenschutz-berlin.de/fileadmin/user…
Einerseits gut, dass die Behörde damit zumindest einige krasse Probleme entschärft hat.

Andererseits werden hier m.E. die Limitierungen des Datenschutzrechts als Instrument zu Eindämmung einseitiger betrieblicher Gestaltungsmacht sichtbar.
"Nach wie vor haben Beschäftigte, die weder als Bewertete noch als Bewerter*innen an dem Bewertungssystem teilnehmen wollen, keine Nachteile zu befürchten"

Kann es diese Freiwilligkeit, die mir eine Grundprämisse der Einschätzung der Behörde zu sein scheint, im Betrieb geben?
Read 12 tweets
15 Apr
"Banning us, the small adtech firms, from harvesting and linking data on billions across 1000s of companies without people's knowledge will benefit big tech, so you shouldn't"

"Banning us, the small food producers, from selling toxic food will benefit big food, so you shouldn't"
"Banning us from providing toxic food will kill competition, innovation and small businesses. Big food also provides toxic food, and they can easily afford to comply with regulations or shape them how they see fit or delay the enforcement, while we, the small producers cannot."
"So, the solution is clearly to allow both small and big food provide toxic food."
Read 4 tweets
12 Apr
…without explanation, the investigator changed the priority level on the escalation from "high" to "low"

Essential read on how FB just does not care about the world, because business goals. Breathtaking irresponsibility. Huge creds to the whistleblower.
theguardian.com/technology/202…
FB has control over global debate and social relationships at an unprecedented scale.

It's disastrous that FB only cares if cheap, very visible or otherwise in its self interest. And it's disastrous that FB has this kind of control, without any democratic accountability, at all.
"It’s not for threat intel to investigate fake engagement"

"I don’t think Honduras is big on people’s minds here"

"we prioritize stopping the most urgent and harmful threats globally. Fake likes is not one of them"

"I wish resources were unlimited"
(w $54.86bn in cash on hand)
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!