The Brazilian Senate is conducting a formal investigation into the COVID response from the federal and state governments. A Pfizer executive this morning testified they offered vaccines to the federal government in August of last year, and they were ignored.
All across Brazil, the vaccine is still unavailable to anyone under 50 with a few exceptions based on profession. An average of 2,000 people or more continue to die daily: of a disease for which an effective vaccine exists but the population can't get.
Meanwhile, Brazil's most reputable polling firm shows Bolsonaro with his lowest approval rating yet: 24%, with 45% disapproving.
In the first round of voting, Lula would get 41%, Bolsonaro 23%, and a mix of center-left/right candidates 24%. In a run-off, Lula wins 55-32.
If the center-left and center-right can agree to unite behind just one candidate -- they're trying, and @CiroGomes would be their best bet -- it's possible (though unlikely) Bolsonaro would fail to make the run-off. It'd be Lula v. the centrist unity candidate.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm really sorry @charlie_savage's huge CIA scoop about Russian bounties -- that misled so many people for so long in very dangerous ways -- fell apart. But attacking me won't save it. Read here about who actually debunked it. CIA isn't a great source:
I guess if I were a NYT reporter who did stenography service for CIA to prolong a war and escalate tensions with a nuclear power, only for it to blow up in my face, I'd also want to pretend it's one person's fault. But everyone pointed it out, not just me
Charlie keeps denying that the reason his CIA friends leaked this story to him about Russian bounties was because they wanted to prevent Trump withdrawing from Afghanistan. I guess it's a *huge coincidence* that the NYT told the CIA tale *one day* before Trump's withdrawal plans:
If you, your relatives, or your friends are Gab users, remember that @micahflee is spending his days and nights trolling through your/their personal data with the intent -- as @theintercept proudly announced when fund-raising -- to expose them if they have the wrong ideology.
Acting like the NSA/FBI, @theintercept and Lee have already doxed one person -- not an official with any government agency, just someone with a political group whose ideology they oppose -- and they got it completely wrong when exposing him.
In 2013, I had a long exchange with then-Executive Editor of the NYT Bill Keller about the new media outlet I was building with @jeremyscahill & Laura Poitras. It's hard to put into words how completely the NYC editors who had no role in creating this have violated all of this:
As part of her ideological war to reclaim the GOP for neocons, the now-deposed House leader falsely denied to @BretBaier yesterday her role in a tale designed to block withdrawal from Afghanistan. She lied repeatedly in this short clip (from @CurtisHouck):
To justify her opposition to Trump's plan to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, Liz Cheney cited the CIA's Russian bounty story without skepticism in a June 27 statement she posted. She then threatened Russia with retaliation based on this discredited story. Watch:
The Intercept is now actively targeting two journalists of color. They have two white male reporters here putting a target on their backs for the crime of reporting on Antifa riots. This is genuinely disgusting and dangerous. Press freedom groups should condemn this. Watch:
This is what so much "journalism" is now. They believe that the real menaces are individuals who have politics or ideology different than their liberal orthodoxies. So these reporters are now like criminals to them because they report for right-wing sites, thus this targeting.
This is on top of what The Intercept has @micahflee doing: trolling through private personal data for Gab users to dox them, as @mtaibbi reported. Do you see who their targets are? Private citizens with the wrong ideology. That's FBI work, not journalism.
Real power over US policy toward Israel and Gaza rests with Biden, Harris, Pelosi, Schumer, Blinken - not Yang. But AOC's function is to shield them from leftist anger.
Pelosi's statement was the same as Yang's. Unlike him, her views matter. Can anyone imagine AOC attacking her?
The Biden State Department has been steadfastly supportive of the Israeli attacks. Biden is one of the most pro-Israel politicians in US life. Schumer, Blinken, Harris and Austin run US foreign policy. So AOC directs leftists' anger away from them to Yang: that's her function.
CDC guidance says masks are unnecessary for fully vaccinated people indoors when they're with other fully vaccinated people. Yet here's @VP Harris - like Biden - contravening that guidance by releasing a photo of herself using a mask *for a Zoom call* in her own office.
The US Govt says the primary impediment to a return to normalcy is the unwillingness of more people to get vaccinated. Yet they keep doing everything possible to send the signal that post-vaccinated life is grim and changes little. Follow The Science.
No criticizing or questioning the behavior of the Vice President because she's just a little lady who shouldn't be subject to critical scrutiny, says this Chivalrous Good Male Liberal Ally (that Harris' aides aren't vaccinated is too stupid for words)