In this paper we (@tbquental, @paulo_prguima and I) explored if the way bird species interact with the plants they feed on depends on how stable the bird species are. But what do we mean by "stable" in this context?
Humans have different "lifespans", with some of us reaching quite old ages and others dying at a younger age. We also interact with other people with different patterns:
Extroverts, on one side, usually interact with many different people and are frequently the connecting point between many different groups, whereas shy people usually form strong bonds with only a few close friends.
Also, the elderly tend to meet many more people through their life than a young person. Following this train of thought, we can do a mind exercise and think of each of us as a different species.
Like us, different species have different longevities (over thousands or, more commonly, millions of years), and interact with other species according to different patterns.
Thus, these different longevities may influence the way species interact with each other, as they have more or less time to establish and maintain these interactions.
Much has been discovered about how species interactions are organised within communities, yet little is known about how these interaction networks are assembled in deep time scales (i.e. millions of years).
Thus, we decided to test whether there is any association between the longevity (or stability, as we call in the paper) in geological timescales and the interaction patterns that bird species show within seed-dispersal networks.
Using mathematical tools and data on the interactions between bird species and the plants they disperse, we found that species that are in the core of the interaction networks belong to lineages that are more stable over millions of years.
This means that bird species that are more stable either interact with more species of plants, or that brings groups of plants closer to one another, connecting different groups of species.
This relationship is even stronger in hotter and wetter environments, highlighting the effect of the abiotic environment in shaping the interaction between animals and plants in geological timescales.
Our results can be of key importance in understanding how these networks and ecosystem functions assemble through time and space, and also how they may respond to future human-mediated extinctions.
It is also followed by a very nice commentary by Carolina Bello and @elisabarretop
Muito, muito, MUITO feliz de compartilhar nosso mais recente trabalho que acabou de ser publicado na @ScienceMagazine, juntamente com @paulo_prguima e @tbquental!
Neste artigo, nós (@tbquental, @prguima e eu) exploramos se a maneira como as espécies de aves interagem com as plantas das quais se alimentam depende de quão estáveis são as espécies de aves. Mas o que queremos dizer com "estável" neste contexto?
Os humanos têm diferentes "tempos de vida", alguns chegando a uma idade bastante avançada e outros morrendo mais cedo. Também interagimos com outras pessoas com padrões diferentes:
Uma das interpretações para o termo "fóssil vivo" vem do fato de essas linhagens apresentarem ramos muito longos em filogenias moleculares, muito mais longos do que a maioria das espécies normalmente apresenta. Um exemplo disso é a Tuatara, esse bichinho simpático da foto.
Porém, esses ramos longos muito provavelmente são artefatos do modo como as filogenias são construídas. Essas filogenias, em sua maior parte, são construídas usando apenas dados de DNA das espécies viventes hoje em dia (já que para fósseis é praticamente impossível obter DNA).