Measurement:
Q. First, when @chefspencil created this map how were they measuring the quality of BBQ?
A. TripAdvisor Restaurant Reviews Averages
Sample:
Q. Second, which reviews made it into their sample?
A. Restaurants “offering BBQ on their menu” that had at least 5 reviews in the 75 largest U.S. cities (they then removed restaurants in any city with less than 10 BBQ places).
🧵Reasons why @chefspencil interpretation of this data might be problematic:
1. Measurement Issues: Are Trip Advisor Restaurant Reviews a good way to measure the best BBQ?
2. Sample Issues: Is this a representative sample?
Note: measurement & sample issues can often overlap.
▪️Restaurant reviews are not always about the taste of the food. Folks may rate a restaurant based on their service, price, and even how easy it is to find parking.
▪️Who leaves restaurant reviews on TripAdvisor? Are they the typical BBQ eater?
▪️Could those living in a BBQ-rich cultures have higher standards when it comes to rating BBQ restaurants – skewing their average ratings?
▪️They only included large cities. Maybe the best BBQ locations are further away from a city center?
▪️Does a minimum of 5 reviews for a restaurant count as a good representation of those who have eaten at the restaurant?
▪️Restaurants were included if they offered BBQ on their menu. Does having BBQ as part of a larger menu really make a restaurant a BBQ joint?
To @chefspencil’s credit they did look at other ways of measuring the best BBQ such as cities with the most BBQ places per capita and the cities with largest number of high-rated BBQ places – cities in both Tennessee and Texas made the top-ten on these lists.
All of this is good reminder that people can use the exact same dataset to tell very different stories.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh