New report documents "sinister truth about the solar industry”

Biden Admin finally says US may sanction solar "slavery" panels

Renewables experiment coming to an end

Bad physics = bad economics = bad morality

THREAD & new piece @Forbes @SubstackInc

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/finally-the-…
I have been writing about the morally urgent need to halt solar panels made under forced labor conditions in China, where the U.S. State Department says genocide is underway. Yesterday, the Biden Administration finally addressed the issue in a congressional hearing.
“How can you assure us,” @RepMcCaul of President Joe Biden’s climate envoy, John Kerry, “that solar panels made from slave labor coming out of China, where genocide is taking place as we speak, are never a part of the climate solution in the United States?”
The Associated Press said that Kerry “sought to defuse one of the main arguments that congressional Republicans have cited.” That may be what he sought to do, but in reality he infused it with greater urgency.
The Associated Press said that Kerry “sought to defuse one of the main arguments that congressional Republicans have cited.” That may be what he sought to do, but in reality he infused it with greater urgency.
“It is a problem,” @JohnKerry acknowledged, adding that McCaul was “absolutely correct” to raise the issue. Kerry said the White House was considering sanctions against “solar panels that we believe in some cases are being produced by forced labor.”
There are today still some progressive Democrats, like the economist Jeffrey Sachs, who deny that a genocide is occurring, and we should indeed always be extremely cautious before using powerful words like “slavery” and “genocide.”
It would be irresponsible to use those words to describe things that are not slavery or genocide, as some have done. @BernieSanders once compared the mostly-white workers of his home state of Vermont to enslaved African Americans. His remarks were insensitive and inaccurate.
But is not insensitive to use the words slavery and genocide in cases of actual slavery and genocide, and in the case of Xinjiang province in China, the State Department under both Biden and Trump administrations labeled the government’s practices there “genocide.”
Now Kerry has done the right thing and labeled the Chinese government’s practices a form of slavery, even if he couldn’t bring himself to use the word.
But slavery is what it is. China's government is forcing the Uyghur minority into concentration camps, and then given the “choice” to not live in them by working at solar panel factories. That’s forced labor, and the kind of enslavement that has been used in past genocides
Kerry suggests the U.S. may apply “sanctions” but all imports of solar panels from China must be halted until they can be certified as made under genocide- and slavery-free conditions.
The U.S. solar industry has suggested that it will be able to easily move factories out of Xinjiang, but the four largest solar panel makers, JinkoSolar, JASolar, TrinaSolar, and LONGi, all source polysilicon from the Muslim region.
“All four of the Uyghur Region’s polysilicon manufacturers are implicated in Uyghur forced labour either through direct participation in forced labour schemes, and/or through their raw material sourcing,” said researchers from Sheffield Hallam University in a new major report.
They found ninety Chinese and multinational companies implicated in forced labor practices. The researchers say they investigated the entire global solar supply “from quartz to panels.”
“At this point the public is well aware of the atrocities happening to the Uyghur people, and there is no way for these companies to do accurate due diligence in the Uyghur Region so we must assume that all materials coming out of the region are tainted with forced labour.”
And if the solar industry relocated out of Xinjiang, would the concentration camps and forced labor be relocated, too?
Meanwhile, America’s leading environmental groups, the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, Environmental Defense Fund, are actively lobbying for the greater use of solar panels and have yet to denounce what is happening in Xinjiang, China.
NRDC is directly invested in solar companies and is actively lobbying in Washington, D.C., Illinois, and California to shut down American nuclear plants and replace them with natural gas & Chinese solar, just as it did with New York’s Indian Point, which shut down last month.
By contrast, the journalists and researchers who have been to, and researched extensively the situation in Xinjiang, write with passion and strong words. The Sheffield University researchers called their findings the “sinister truth about the solar industry.”
I have extensively documented how renewables everywhere make electricity more expensive. Supposedly cheap solar panels increased the price of electricity in California seven times more than prices increased in the rest of the U.S. over the last decade.
But the Xinjiang episode further exposes as fraudulent the claims that solar is cheap. The need to use the cheapest labor, enslaved, and the cheapest energy, coal underscores the underlying physical problem with all renewables, which is their very low “power densities.”
Power density is the amount of electricity produced per unit of land. But we’re now finding out that the solar industry tries to address these high physical costs by seeking out savings in other areas, like labor.
Nuclear is the highest power density energy which allows for the wages of U.S. nuclear power plant employees to be so high despite the low cost of delivered electricity to consumers.
France shows that a nuclear-majority system delivers electricity at nearly half the cost of a renewables-heavy systems like Germany’s. Almost all the cost of nuclear goes to labor, with a very small amount going to buy a bit of uranium for each batch of fuel every 1.5 years.
National, regional, and local governments may continue to subsidize or mandate industrial wind energy and solar panel farms for years to come. Congress has renewed the mandate for corn ethanol, which is in terms of both pollution and land use worse than petroleum, since 1978.
But everybody today outside of the corn lobby knows that the ethanol subsidy is pure pork spending, and environmentally degrading. In fact, it was the World Resources Institute, a progressive environmentalist think tank, which both debunked the myth that ethanol was green.
Today, all major environmental groups including Greenpeace are against ethanol and other biofuels alongside conservative think tanks Cato and Heritage.
As such, ethanol is no longer viewed as good for the environment, and has little chance of scaling up. Its production and use have been flat for the last decade, and there are few prospects for it to increase.
It is inevitable that the same will occur with solar and wind, it’s now just a matter of time. The problems facing ethanol, solar, wind and other renewables all stem from the same problem with all renewables, which is that they are low power-density and thus inefficient.
Solar and wind add the additional disadvantage of being even more weather-dependent than ethanol from crops, which makes them worse than worthless during extreme weather events, since they divert money from power sources that can work during heat waves and cold snaps.
Kerry tried to put on a positive spin. “The best thing we could do is be more competitive” when it comes to making solar panels.

But if the U.S. tried to make solar panels, solar would have a sudden jump upwards in cost to go along with our labor and environmental standards.
The lesson from past genocides is that we must humanize the people who are being wiped out, but Islam is an unpopular religion today and the spelling and pronunciation of Uyghur is difficult.
As such, the genocide against them isn’t getting anywhere near the attention that Hollywood, the celebrity actor class, and rock stars have in the past rained on other genocides, from Darfur to Tibet.
Which is all the more reason we must speak up for the Uyghur.

/END

P.S. Please subscribe now to my Substack or click here to make a tax-deductible donation to Environmental Progress.

michaelshellenberger.substack.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Shellenberger

Michael Shellenberger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShellenbergerMD

13 May
Corey is homeless & addicted to fentanyl

He could OD & die as nearly 90k Americans did in 2020

No psychiatrist thinks fentanyl is good medicine for mental illness & yet we enable its use

Here's why Californians should be ashamed of ourselves

THREAD

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/why-californ…
In the fall of 2019, someone posted a picture of a homeless man to a Facebook group called “BART Rants and Raves,” where people share photos and videos of the often upsetting things they see while riding BART, the San Francisco Bay Area’s subway system.
The photo was of 30-year-old Corey Sylvester. He was passed out and looked very sick. His clothes were ragged, his hair and beard matted.
Read 63 tweets
11 May
From 2010-2020, California saw homelessness rise 31% even as it declined 18% in the rest of U.S.

Today, Gov. @GavinNewsom announced he would double down the very same policies that made homelessness worse

Here's what he should do instead

THREAD

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/why-californ…
California saw its homeless population rise by 31 percent even as the number of homeless declined 18 percent in the rest of the United States between 2010 and 2020.
As a result, there are today 161,000 total homeless in California, with about 113,000 of them “unsheltered,” meaning they’re sleeping in tents on sidewalks, in parks, and alongside highways.
Read 51 tweets
7 May
The Democrats $2.3 trillion climate infrastructure bill could worsen blackouts, inflation, & poverty but, in the biggest pro-nuclear victory to date, could also save America's nuclear plants

My latest for Substack, please share!

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/biden-goes-n…
Over the last five years, my colleagues and I have worked with scientists and environmentalists around the world to stop anti-nuclear activists from shutting down nuclear power plants.
I testified six times before Congress, gave three TED talks that have been viewed over six million times, and published Apocalypse Never, which argues that only nuclear energy can guarantee universal prosperity and environmental progress.
Read 16 tweets
3 May
Hi @fmanjoo @nytimes

Your recent article claims “fossil fuels... get more expensive as we pull more of them from the ground”

But that’s falsified by the tech revolution which dramatically lowered the price of natural gas (graph below)

Isn’t a correction merited?
You might be interested in research I did into the origins of the fracking revolution which resulted in radical price declines of oil & gas. It was cited by your colleague a few years back:

nytimes.com/2015/01/21/bus…
You might also be interested in reporting done by your newspaper into the use of forced labor to make solar panels, which may be responsible for a significant share of their price decline, alongside dumping, neither of which is mentioned in your column

nytimes.com/2021/01/08/bus…
Read 12 tweets
2 May
New research from Princeton University and Bloomberg confirms that renewables require 300 - 400 times more land than natural gas and nuclear plants

Finally They Admit Renewables Are Terrible For The Environment

My latest for Substack. Please share!

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/finally-they…
Over the last few years, I have been pushing back against the idea that renewables are good for the environment.

In 2019 I published, “Why Renewables Can’t Save the Planet,” which was the most-read article of the year at Quillette.

quillette.com/2019/02/27/why…
And I gave a TEDx talk by the same name which today has 2.5 million views.

Read 11 tweets
1 May
“The idea that we’re a cancer on the planet—well, what do you do with cancer? You eradicate it. I’ve heard environmentally sensitive types say that, and it’s horrifying. They’re completely blind to what they’re saying. If they weren’t blind to it, they’d be traumatized by it.”
“Is this de­sire to de­stroy a sign of some twisted spir­i­tual long­ing?”

“I think so,” said Jordan Peterson. “The peo­ple who car­i­ca­ture West­ern so­ci­ety as a pa­tri­archy, and then de­scribe it as evil, they’re pos­sessed by a re­li­gious idea.”
I agree:

“The trouble with the new environmental religion is that it has become increasingly apocalyptic, destructive, and self-defeating. It leads its adherents to demonize their opponents, often hypocritically.”
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(