@JakeLobin "It was a bright cold day & the clocks were striking 13"
We ought not be amazed or confounded by the cult-sotted "GOP" party & their compliant members with their staggering lack of rational consistency.
What is true at this very moment may have been false only a moment ago.
@JakeLobin 2/ Take any issue of substance, past or present, there will be a head-snapping flip. Just about the time that one settles it, flip again.
It takes a well oiled gimbal for a brain to adroitly follow what is the party line now. Not yesterday. Not tomorrow.
That to be determined.
@JakeLobin 3/ That is what 'memory holes' are for.
One day Republican leaders may strongly condemn Trump for his role in inciting insurrection. Today, it was just a bunch of tourists. Deny that? You are summarily drummed out of the party.
"How many fingers Winston?"
"How many Liz Cheney?"
@JakeLobin 4/ The basis of the reality of Trump's GOP is unquestioned compliance. Not policy. Not public service. Such things are anachronistic to this power-hungry bunch.
The one constant, the star which is their light, is not the good of the country, but the getting & keeping power.
@JakeLobin 5/ Understand this, and there will never be any amazement or puzzle about anything Trump & his minions can do. No matter how idiotic. No matter how incongruous.
There is no logical contradiction that can penetrate the impenetrable "Now". Yesterday is not even acknowledged.
@JakeLobin 6/ You will not rattle the certainty of this team w such trivialities as logic and reason.
This is what it is to be Trump and a member of his wholly subsumed party: You love the party.. or you are out. Ask Liz.
@JakeLobin 7/ The politician's "Room 101" is a primary challenge & be out of the good graces of the Party. Nothing as august as facts, principles, or truth are strong enough to steel oneself against the threat of being primaried by even more devoted actors.
"Do you love the party?"
@JakeLobin 8/ The irrational ability of the GOP to "believe 6 impossible things before breakfast" is a super power.
It is defeated by not buying into the argument.
There is no argument.
Anything stated today as fact will change tomorrow, or in a minute, as needed, to keep up the charade.
@JakeLobin 9/ The 'party' creates a diversion by making some illogical move...A great deal of energy is spent pointing out how absurd such a thing is. Not to mention inconsistent.
If you manage to get a question in edgewise, the premise will have already been abandoned for a new position...
@JakeLobin 10/ Such is the power of power-lust. It makes Sméagol mad with desire for his 'precious'. There is no more clear picture of the Trumpian GOP.
The 'pubs want to win the next election. To take power. For what purpose? Have they articulated any position/platform other than "No"?
@JakeLobin 11/ It is essential to comprehend this to und the "nonsense". The confusion experienced when trying to work out the contradictions and inscrutable that is created by thinking there is a shared fundamental premise.
There is not.
Grok this & it becomes obvious what is happening.
@tommy_pane GP is barely readable it is so full of tripe. The comments even more so.
I esp "enjoy" how the Trumpers have to find some off to the side detail to magnify into a mountain and then use that to insinuate "see...EVERYTHING THE ANTI TRUMP PEOPLE ARE SAYING IS WRONG..LOOK AT THIS".
@tommy_pane 2/ In the case of this article it is the Steele report. And in particular the "dossier’s most explosive claims".
Elevating the 'pee pee tape' as if this were the central and most important claim in that report is so disingenuous as to be laughable... which it is.
@tommy_pane 3/ 1st. The Steele report was never proposed as conclusive. It was a research report of issues to be followed up on. Some of the details have been validated others not, or inconclusive, as the report quoted says.
The important claim in the report was the Russia involvement in
@Politics_PR Let nothing trouble the crystalized beliefs
Anything that muddles the mind w facts or reality is to be ignored & forgot as soon as possible.
It never happened.
The only thing that is happening is Trump. The key to the party's getting of power.
The question is why does it work?
@Politics_PR 2/ It is not a very pleasant question.
It indicts an incredibly large percentage of the population that has gone into the fog bank that is Trumpism.
It will be increasingly hard, & embarrassing, to admit mistake. And so an error will codify into a 'religion'...
@Politics_PR 3/ And so an error will codify into a 'religion', which may be sufficient to create a new (and old) fundamental split as severe as the original one that birthed the Civil War.
And, in fact, energized by some of the very same axiomatic values & beliefs.
@tommy_pane I have read your reply. A couple of times.
I'll forebear the puzzled response. Other than to notice your amazing (to me, really it is banal, obvious, and expected by now) ability to contort basic facts into a shape that solicits a picture of a seriously gerrymandered district.
@tommy_pane 2/ What you have to ignore, & what you have to "interpret" in order to buttress your argument is so comprehensive there is nothing left of the original facts.
Your assertions/conclusions are so divorced from the facts/reality that it stuns the ability to actually engage.
@tommy_pane 3/ Which I suppose is the point of a 'religious' devotion. There is no way to contradict a "miracle". Beliefs override knowledge/science/facts.
Your beliefs are impregnable.
Which is fine. It is part of the liberty you(we) have. But it doesn’t allow for meaningful discussion
A PSA for all those who post Tucker Carlson videos and outrages:
His network argues that he is unbelievable, and the judge agrees.
Take nothing he says as meaningful of anything but absurdity and bullshit.
U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil: [accepting] arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses..is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' & 'non-literal commentary.' "
"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes.
That ancient system cannot be allow such impudence on the part of the citizens to stand.
Now we wait to find out if we are watching the sputtering end of one pathetic era, or the emergence of a new one, reborn, renewed and reenergized to take the fight into the next 50years.
But in the meantime, this news today is a corker...
The lead Trump Attorney, Powell (not Palmer), today, in court admits, and claims as her defense that no one should have believed her. She was not saying anything factual, just
As your defense and what paltry "proof" held encounters reality & a fact based world it is found repeatedly to be without substance and utterly flawed.
The list is long. The case you are trying to make was adjudicated at multiple levels and found
@tommy_pane@BillKristol 3/ unsubstantiated, or in error.
But Gulliani & Powell, along w others, were precise in their claims. Claims that, when they are challenged in the daylight, instead of the rats hole they fester in, they are not only proven to be a fraud, but are BY THEMSELVES denounced as such.