We don’t know who the “senior ally” of @BorisJohnson quoted by @Telegraph is. We can guess. @DavidGHFrost well knows that if the Northern Ireland Protocol is “dead in the water”, so is the “oven-ready” Brexit. Either that or the Good Friday Agreement. /1.
So, which is it, folks? The “senior ally” complains that the NIP breaks the GFA. That means Boris’ Brexit does. Recall: we’re talking about a legally binding international agreement. And we know @BorisJohnson@DavidGHFrost & the Cabinet would never break international law. /2.
Obviously that also means they would never countenance a border across Ireland. We all know the upshot of all that is the UK has to accept the need to return to the EU’s customs union & single market. Or substantially identical arrangements. /3.
The continuing farce of pretending otherwise has long since been putting livelihoods & lives at risk. And shredding the UK’s international reputation. “Alternative arrangements” & other zombie unicorns like “mutual recognition” are, how can one put this ... rubbish. /4.
They always were nonsensical fantasies. @DavidGHFrost has known that throughout. He knows it now. So, let’s cut to the chase. Set the legal sophistry & hallucinogens aside. And respect reality. /5.
Playing fast & loose with the GFA is not only deeply irresponsible. It’s a mug’s game. Even when Donald Trump was still in the White House. Let alone now, with President Biden. /6.
You can pretend putting a customs & regulatory border across Ireland is GFA-compatible. An irresistible force is going to make clear to you, that’s not on. /7.
You can contort your fertile imagination to persuade yourself, & pretend to others, that a deal which places a border between NI & GB doesn’t technically change NI’s status, as defined in the GFA. And therefore doesn’t require prior majority consent by NI’s population. /8.
You can go on to ignore the cognitive dissonance as you nonetheless recognise consent is, after all, required. But you create the convenient fiction that consent years after the event is just fine. You can do all that. But reality will catch up with you. /9.
You can insult the intelligence of every expert, everyone with even a passing knowledge of the issues, & declare a technological, administrative & legal mirage will solve the insoluble. At the frontier across Ireland. Between GB & NI. Both. The Moon. It’ll still be a lie. /10
What you know is this. In your heart. Your head. Any Brexit’s dumb. Boris’ Brexit is a Humpty Dumpty Brexit. It contains at least six impossible things. Before, during or after breakfast. And it relies on words meaning what Boris decides they mean. Not what they really mean. /11.
It’s completely unsustainable. To use a different cultural reference, it’s a Norwegian Blue Brexit. And it isn’t “just resting”. It was deceased before the 2019 general election. But No. 10 shopkeeper Boris, having sold it, keeps up the performance that it’s alive. /12.
Blaming @DavidGHFrost is entirely beside the point. OK, he’s in the Cabinet. He has to take the punishment which can go with that. And many will say, deservedly so. He always knew & knows all of the above, after all. /13.
This is @BorisJohnson’s Brexit. It’s unworkable. It’s dangerous. And it’s failing fast. There’s a long list of guilty men & women. They need to be dealt with. But first, the Prime Minister has to recognise there’s no way out of the corner into which he’s backed himself. /14.
He can’t have his Brexit. He can have a different one. A customs union & single market one. An utterly pointless one, to be sure. The culmination of @David_Cameron’s carelessly catastrophic European odyssey. A Brexit which will almost certainly detonate his political career. /15.
But a Brexit which would have the merit, as some of us would see it, at least, of not detonating the country. /16.
Sure, Brexit isn’t really about the EU. It’s a much more profound revolution than that. But it is, whether Brexiters like it or not, necessarily about Ireland. It always has been. /17.
And however many elections they win in the UK, there’s no way out which both meets their radical objectives & the political & legal realities presented by Ireland. /18.
There’s too much at stake for others. Powerful others. Who aren’t going to help @BorisJohnson.
That isn’t to say UK Brexit opponents should lazily rely on the Irish dimension to solve their problem. That’s the kind of approach which loses referendums... /19.
Read @LordRickettsP’s book, “Hard Choices: What Britain Does Next”. You simply won’t get a better account anywhere of what it’s been like trying to guide the UK through the tectonic shifts of global power these last few decades. You’ll learn much. If you’re willing. /1.
No one who knows @LordRickettsP - considerate, calm, clear-sighted - would think of him as brutal. But don’t be fooled. His book isn’t for the faint of heart. If this extract strikes a chord with you, you’ll want to read more. If it doesn’t, you need to.👇/2.
As @LordRickettsP says, quoting Thucydides: “The strong do what they can & the weak suffer what they must”. And, as others have pointed out: on the global stage, all European powers are small. The difference lies between those who’ve understood that & those who haven’t. /3.
What’s fascinating about @lewis_goodall’s report👇of @ukhomeoffice reaction after a senior police officer in Glasgow decided to release people detained by UK officials is the begged questions.
Who are “the frontline”?
Which is “our country”?
Who’s in charge?
A🧵/1.
Clearly, there were two “frontlines” in this case (not counting what the HO described as a “mob”): UK immigration officials, & the (Scottish) police. /2.
And there are two countries. The UK. And Scotland. That’s far from a purely historical, emotional or cultural point. Although it’s that too. It’s a political, legal & operational one. As we saw in Glasgow earlier. /3.
UK vaccine distribution, which has been better than many, worse than some, doesn’t bring dead people back. Nor does it reverse bereavement. Of 130,000 Covid deaths in the UK, the vast majority were entirely avoidable. /2.
Even taking a lenient view of a series of catastrophic failures last year, 100,000 were. US research suggests a “kin bereavement multiplier” of 9. This looks at family, not friends. Including the latter would give a higher multiplier. /3.
People who don’t understand French, or the EU, or immigration & frontier control, really shouldn’t comment on @MichelBarnier talking (in French) about those subjects.
▪️the EU should strengthen the Schengen external frontier. (Note: the UK wasn’t in Schengen); /2.
▪️France, a sovereign nation in the EU, while still allowing students & refugees to come, should pause immigration from non-EU countries for a few years. /3.
Yes. The parliamentary election on 6 May returned a majority of MSPs from parties with it as a manifesto commitment. A prominent one (obviously).
Full stop.
But, if you want to play Vote Count Lotto, do it properly.
A 🧵. /1.
For that, you need to know what the Scottish electoral system is. And, if you do know, acknowledge its nature & implications.
So, a recap. Bear with me. /2.
It’s a form of proportional representation. Specifically, an “additional member” system. Somewhat over half the seats are voted for on a constituency basis (“first past the post” or plurality voting: whoever gets the most votes wins the seat). /3.
Most of England - politicians, media, public - has little idea of the extraordinary political event which has taken place in Scotland.
The same’s true of many Scottish unionists.
The Union’s closer to break up than any time in 314 years.
Ostriches won’t save it. What might?/1.
Because opinion on independence is approx. evenly split (itself a huge deal: around half of people in Scotland want to leave the UK!) relatively small shifts can tip the balance.
And, no doubt, everything will be tried to achieve that. /2.
But, what’s really made a difference to support for independence is England’s & Westminster’s descent into what’s perceived as chaotically unreliable, untrustworthy, incompetent & cruel governance. /3.