The Covid inquiry indicated by ⁦@BorisJohnson⁩ will be in the context of over 1M people bereaved by the disease in the UK.

1M could have been avoided, it appears, if the govt hadn’t made multiple, serious errors.

Who cares?

A 🧵/1. pnas.org/content/117/30…
UK vaccine distribution, which has been better than many, worse than some, doesn’t bring dead people back. Nor does it reverse bereavement. Of 130,000 Covid deaths in the UK, the vast majority were entirely avoidable. /2.
Even taking a lenient view of a series of catastrophic failures last year, 100,000 were. US research suggests a “kin bereavement multiplier” of 9. This looks at family, not friends. Including the latter would give a higher multiplier. /3.
It’s reasonable to suppose a million people in the UK have suffered deep loss as a direct result of the failures of UK pandemic response. Perhaps for each of those people, someone else feels hurt & angry on their behalf. Maybe it’s two people. If so, that brings us to 3M. /4.
Can the government just shrug that off? Almost certainly yes. The remaining 64M people in the UK either won’t care, or won’t care enough. We’ve seen it already, in the way the Covid bereaved have been largely ignored. And in other areas. /5.
The appalling treatment of 3M EU citizens, for example. Where’s the mass outrage been? The sad truth is, whether it’s millions or a few (such as the people shot dead by the Army at Ballymurphy), if it’s a small minority it’s likely to be ignored, explained away, forgotten. /6.
So the chances are, hardly anyone cares. Or, at least, no one who “matters”.

Sometimes things turn out differently. Campaigning can dramatically multiply the profile, saliency & political impact of an issue.

Will someone do that, & if so how, for the UK Covid nightmare? /7. End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Levi

Andrew Levi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndrewPRLevi

12 May
People who don’t understand French, or the EU, or immigration & frontier control, really shouldn’t comment on @MichelBarnier talking (in French) about those subjects.

There’s a lot of it about.

Want the truth? A short 🧵/1.
.@MichelBarnier’s saying:

▪️the EU should strengthen the Schengen external frontier. (Note: the UK wasn’t in Schengen); /2.
▪️France, a sovereign nation in the EU, while still allowing students & refugees to come, should pause immigration from non-EU countries for a few years. /3.
Read 9 tweets
10 May
Did Scotland vote for an independence referendum?

Yes. The parliamentary election on 6 May returned a majority of MSPs from parties with it as a manifesto commitment. A prominent one (obviously).

Full stop.

But, if you want to play Vote Count Lotto, do it properly.

A 🧵. /1.
For that, you need to know what the Scottish electoral system is. And, if you do know, acknowledge its nature & implications.

So, a recap. Bear with me. /2.
It’s a form of proportional representation. Specifically, an “additional member” system. Somewhat over half the seats are voted for on a constituency basis (“first past the post” or plurality voting: whoever gets the most votes wins the seat). /3.
Read 17 tweets
9 May
Most of England - politicians, media, public - has little idea of the extraordinary political event which has taken place in Scotland.

The same’s true of many Scottish unionists.

The Union’s closer to break up than any time in 314 years.

Ostriches won’t save it. What might?/1.
Because opinion on independence is approx. evenly split (itself a huge deal: around half of people in Scotland want to leave the UK!) relatively small shifts can tip the balance.

And, no doubt, everything will be tried to achieve that. /2.
But, what’s really made a difference to support for independence is England’s & Westminster’s descent into what’s perceived as chaotically unreliable, untrustworthy, incompetent & cruel governance. /3.
Read 8 tweets
8 May
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Election: update & implications 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

The maximum constituency wins @theSNP can now achieve is 62.

So they’ll need 3 regional list seats for an overall majority (65).

BBC says that isn’t on. I’m less sure. (@WhatScotsThink is the BBC analyst, so I say it with trepidation). /1.
Either way, to be certain we’re going to have to wait for the regional list results.

If the @theSNP doesn’t get an overall majority there’ll almost certainly be a parliamentary majority for independence, as @scottishgreens will win a number of seats. /2.
The territorial integrity of the United Kingdom has never been less likely to survive. Since a century ago, when the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Ireland ended.

Northern Ireland’s been part defenestrated, by the UK’s choice to leave the EU customs union & single market. /3.
Read 5 tweets
8 May
Before the final results in Scotland, a reminder:

▪️These are national parliamentary elections. Not local.

▪️The most prominent issue in them has been whether one nation (Scotland) should hold a referendum on leaving union of nations (UK). /1.
▪️A parliamentary majority for an independence referendum will be just that. Given Scotland’s proportional voting system, that’s as good & constitutionally sound an expression of democratic will as you’ll find. (Note: in a Westminster system, the SNP would have 80%+ of MSPs). /2.
▪️Such a majority looks likely: SNP + Greens. We’ll find out later.

▪️It’s possible, but less likely, that the SNP will achieve a governing majority on its own: 65 or more MSPs out of 129. More likely: SNP just below that, & a governing majority in coalition with the Greens. /3.
Read 9 tweets
2 May
The sister of a colleague is having trouble with the truth, liars, lies, lying & falsehoods. She doesn’t know what they are. She has over a million Twitter followers & a huge media profile.

I worry for my colleague. Her sister. And the UK. I thought I might try to help.

A🧵/1.
The @OED will, I hope, forgive me for the inevitable process of simplification I’m about to apply to their learned entries. But I’ll try to avoid recreating the farrago of nonsense we’ve been seeing on the subject of truth & lying.

Let’s start with the meaning of “true”. /2.
This is quite easy really. For those not easily distracted by inverted pyramids of piffle.

To be true is to conform with reality & fact.

Which brings us to “truth”.

Truth is that which is true. Real. Factual.

Phew. We’re getting somewhere.

Bear with me. /3.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(