(Thread) Why the destructive lies from Republicans will keep getting more outrageous

I did another of my Sunday videos (☕️ + talk)

I’ll put an edited transcription in the next tweet if you prefer that. I'll also do an abbreviated Twitter Summary.
1/ [edited] transcription here: terikanefield.com/lies-that-dest…

Examples from the past week.

Rep. Clyde said, “to call it an insurrection . . . is a bald-faced lie." He also likened what happened to a "tourist visit."
businessinsider.com/gop-rep-says-c…
2/ Louie Gohmert said there was “no evidence of an armed insurrection,” said no firearms had been confiscated.
cnn.com/2021/05/14/pol…

Sen. Rand Paul and Tucker Carlson implied that Dr. Fauci is responsible for the outbreak of Covid. 
washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
3/ I’ve already talked a little bit about they tell such outrageous lies: Fascist Lies. They believe the lies are in service to a “higher” truth.


What’s startling is how many people believe or willingly to along with them.
4/ Laura asked this:


The short answer is that the lies destroy and they want to destroy. The lies sock it to their enemies and they want to sock it to their enemies.

The lies rile their followers.
5/ Trump tells these guys that they are the top of the hierarchy, and if they didn’t have everything they deserve, it was because undeserving others, people who are not real Americans, are trying to replace them and take what is theirs.

That's an appealing lie for these guys.
6/ The problem of course is that these lies are intended to destroy liberal democracy.

First, a definition (Liberal democracy)👇

America, according to this definition, has only been a liberal democracy since the modern civil rights and women’s rights movements.
7/ It wasn’t until the federal legislation of the 1960s that America came anything close to a liberal democracy.

Republicans want to roll that back and take us back to the days when America was entirely ruled by white men.

That's what MAGA means.
8/ Ethnic majorities rarely give up their dominant status without a fight (Ziblatt and Levitsky)

Prof. Levitsky 👇says that we’re going through a political earthquake as America transitions from a nation ruled by white men to a true liberal democracy.
9/ Another book that I find helpful was Richard Hofstadter, The Paranoid Style in American Politics.

He talks about how the far right-wing believes that unseen satanic forces are trying to destroy something larger in which they belong.

He wrote this in the early 1960s!
10/ The “something larger” is generally phrased as “the American way of life.”

 They “feel dispossessed” and that “America has been largely taken away from them."

They're determined to prevent what they see as the final act of subversion. They therefore adopt extreme measures.
11/ He also noted that this paranoid element, once on the fringes of the far-right, was moving into mainstream politics and perhaps becoming more permanent.

It seems to me that's because that was precisely when the Civil Rights movement was having an effect.
12/ The "paranoid" fear that they're losing something makes them "militant." (Hofstadter) They abandon traditional politics, which they think is corrupted.

You see how this fits together. They believe they're losing something and they desperately want to hold on to it.
13/ The Republicans have a problem. Their demographics are shrinking.

The goal of holding on to an era when white men ruled is getting harder to achieve.

Jay Rosen quotes this:
14/ Yes, the lying has escalated.

The lying is escalating BECAUSE they lost. They’re feeling more desperate. They think they need to save America.

The fact is that lies destroy democracy: Democracy is based on rule of law, which requires a shared factuality.
15/ (more in the blog post and video)

So Republican Party is letting loose with a firehose of falsehoods.

The blitz of lies can make people feel that objective truth is unknowable.
16/ They give up trying to sort through the news. They conclude it’s better not to listen to the news at all.

Instead, they listen to someone in their community who they think knows.

The question of the hour: Will these lies succeed in destroying Democracy?
17/ I don’t think so — unless the rest of us become complacent.

They’re outnumbered and their numbers are shrinking, which is why they’re desperate. prri.org/spotlight/the-…
18/ The more it looks like they’re going to lose, the more desperate they’re going to become, and the outlandish their lies will be. 

So you can expect the firehose of falsehoods to continue.

I suggest you all put on your raincoats so you’re prepared.
19/ I should have added this👇

Another purpose of the outrageous lies is to wear out and discourage the opposition.

What do rational people do when an elected member of Congress says the insurrection was like a tourist visit?
To use @ThePlumLineGS's phrase, the right-wing information universe is "hermetically sealed."

That's why Republicans can say one thing for mainstream media and another for right-wing media without fear of their supporters thinking they are inconsistent.
They are doing journalism the way it's normally done in a functioning democracy, and what they all learned in Journalism School.

As @jayrosen_nyu points out, the problem is one political party is anti-democratic, so "journalism as usual" doesn't work.

In a functioning democracy, you give both sides equal time. The kind of debate required in a functioning democracy requires the presentation of both sides.

But what do you do when one side is trying to destroy democracy?

Or, put another way, one side wants to go back to 1950.
I love that people are giving different years for this.

I often give 1920 as their target year: Before the federal regulations and agencies that stopped corporations from cheating.

I picked 1950 for this thread because the electorate was still almost entirely white.
In the video, I mentioned the mythic world portrayed in 1950s TV shows like Leave it to Beaver: Happy mom dusting the house, smiling, in her uncomfortable shoes. Blacks are happy servants. Little (white) boys are plucky and get into (harmless)trouble.
It's like Devin Nunes knew I wrote a thread on the outrageousness of Republican lies, so he thought he'd provide a demonstration.


Q: Can it get even crazier?
A: Yes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

17 May
The rationalization is this: "Makers" deserve a break because they lift everyone by creating jobs.

Workers, on the other hand, are basically lazy (that's why they're not "makers") so financial perks persuade them to stay at home and mooch.

That's the thinking.
(good question)
Adherents of the Ayn Rand view of the world see "makers" and "takers."

Their view: The competent (makers) rise to the top and run the corporations. Takers are not as (1) smart or (2) driven and will take advantage of handouts.

Makers use perks (tax cuts) to help everyone.
Yes, I read Atlas Shrugged.
Read 4 tweets
13 May
This is both shocking and not surprising (if that makes sense).

Activists and Ex-Spy Plotted to Discredit Trump ‘Enemies’ in Government nytimes.com/2021/05/13/us/…
It's like a Firehose of Watergates: What did the Trump Whitehouse know, and when did they know it?

How to escape scrutiny for scandals: Commit so many that people wear out and can't focus on any.

And oh, the irony!

All that ranting about the FBI spying on the Trump Campaign.
"How dare anyone say anything bad about Trump!" says the same people who insisted Obama was a secret Muslim.

It also shows what the conservative "domestic policy" involves. Making life better for Americans? Nooooooo.

It's all about solidifying power.
Read 5 tweets
12 May
Unfortunately, I don't think so. It will continue its trajectory of shrinking in numbers while becoming more unhinged and dangerous.

As I see it, only one thing can change the trajectory of the Republican Party and cause its quick demise (meaning over the next 5 years or so)

1/
There are a few things this group can do that will hasten the demise of the Republican Party.

If sitting members of Congress join, and if they start voting with Democrats, and if they vote for Democrats, you will see the Republican Party implode.

2/
This, however, is unlikely.

If they include elected state Republicans, and all they want is for the Republican Party to break with Trump, the only accomplishment will be that if Trump runs, he will have an even harder time winning reelection.

What I expect . . .

3/
Read 7 tweets
9 May
(Thread) Drifting toward totalitarianism

I made another YouTube video here:

(This is getting to be a Sunday thing for me:☕️ + talk)

As before, I’ll link to an [edited] transcription in the next tweet.

Mother's Day! Talk about politics!
1/ After a ☕️ break, I’ll come back and add a Twitter summary.

A transcription is here: terikanefield.com/?p=13857&previ…

There is an aspect to totalitarianism we need to talk about: People believe what they are told to believe.
2/ The latest chapter in the saga of the radicalization of the Republican Party centers on Liz Cheney, who may be ousted from her leadership position in the House because she refuses to capitulate to Trump’s big lie about the election.

Read 24 tweets
4 May
"the" message.

One person decides the message. They all dutifully repeat it.

That's what they do in place of governing to improve the lives of their constituents.

All they really want to do is control "the message" (create their own truth).
It's so much easier to create your own truth than it is to deal with reality and facts, but you need everyone on board.

If a tree didn't fall in the woods, but everyone thinks it did, the tree really did fall, right?
Ooops. I meant to quote this in the first tweet.

"The message"

I fail Twitter this morning.
Read 7 tweets
2 May
The Radicalization of the Republican Party

I recorded another YouTube video here:

If you prefer to read, I’ll link to an [edited] transcription in the next tweet.

Some people like to stay on Twitter with threads, so after I take a break ☕️ . . .
. . . I’ll come back and see if I can post the material as a thread.

(I may find that it’s too long. I like to keep threads under about 20 tweets).

The edited transcription is here: terikanefield.com/the-radicaliza…

Meanwhile, it's still morning in California, so time for more ☕️.

1/
2/ Okay, Video Summary as Twitter Thread.

A few days ago, Ted Cruz published an Op-Ed in the WSJ, and Tweeted the conclusion:

Yes, he's admitting that he takes corporate money in exchange for doing their bidding. (But we knew that.) Also: Ted Cruz turn away corporate money? 🤣
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(