Rep. Clyde said, “to call it an insurrection . . . is a bald-faced lie." He also likened what happened to a "tourist visit." businessinsider.com/gop-rep-says-c…
2/ Louie Gohmert said there was “no evidence of an armed insurrection,” said no firearms had been confiscated. cnn.com/2021/05/14/pol…
The short answer is that the lies destroy and they want to destroy. The lies sock it to their enemies and they want to sock it to their enemies.
The lies rile their followers.
5/ Trump tells these guys that they are the top of the hierarchy, and if they didn’t have everything they deserve, it was because undeserving others, people who are not real Americans, are trying to replace them and take what is theirs.
That's an appealing lie for these guys.
6/ The problem of course is that these lies are intended to destroy liberal democracy.
First, a definition (Liberal democracy)👇
America, according to this definition, has only been a liberal democracy since the modern civil rights and women’s rights movements.
7/ It wasn’t until the federal legislation of the 1960s that America came anything close to a liberal democracy.
Republicans want to roll that back and take us back to the days when America was entirely ruled by white men.
That's what MAGA means.
8/ Ethnic majorities rarely give up their dominant status without a fight (Ziblatt and Levitsky)
Prof. Levitsky 👇says that we’re going through a political earthquake as America transitions from a nation ruled by white men to a true liberal democracy.
9/ Another book that I find helpful was Richard Hofstadter, The Paranoid Style in American Politics.
He talks about how the far right-wing believes that unseen satanic forces are trying to destroy something larger in which they belong.
He wrote this in the early 1960s!
10/ The “something larger” is generally phrased as “the American way of life.”
They “feel dispossessed” and that “America has been largely taken away from them."
They're determined to prevent what they see as the final act of subversion. They therefore adopt extreme measures.
11/ He also noted that this paranoid element, once on the fringes of the far-right, was moving into mainstream politics and perhaps becoming more permanent.
It seems to me that's because that was precisely when the Civil Rights movement was having an effect.
12/ The "paranoid" fear that they're losing something makes them "militant." (Hofstadter) They abandon traditional politics, which they think is corrupted.
You see how this fits together. They believe they're losing something and they desperately want to hold on to it.
13/ The Republicans have a problem. Their demographics are shrinking.
The goal of holding on to an era when white men ruled is getting harder to achieve.
To use @ThePlumLineGS's phrase, the right-wing information universe is "hermetically sealed."
That's why Republicans can say one thing for mainstream media and another for right-wing media without fear of their supporters thinking they are inconsistent.
In a functioning democracy, you give both sides equal time. The kind of debate required in a functioning democracy requires the presentation of both sides.
But what do you do when one side is trying to destroy democracy?
Or, put another way, one side wants to go back to 1950.
I love that people are giving different years for this.
I often give 1920 as their target year: Before the federal regulations and agencies that stopped corporations from cheating.
I picked 1950 for this thread because the electorate was still almost entirely white.
In the video, I mentioned the mythic world portrayed in 1950s TV shows like Leave it to Beaver: Happy mom dusting the house, smiling, in her uncomfortable shoes. Blacks are happy servants. Little (white) boys are plucky and get into (harmless)trouble.
Adherents of the Ayn Rand view of the world see "makers" and "takers."
Their view: The competent (makers) rise to the top and run the corporations. Takers are not as (1) smart or (2) driven and will take advantage of handouts.
There are a few things this group can do that will hasten the demise of the Republican Party.
If sitting members of Congress join, and if they start voting with Democrats, and if they vote for Democrats, you will see the Republican Party implode.
If they include elected state Republicans, and all they want is for the Republican Party to break with Trump, the only accomplishment will be that if Trump runs, he will have an even harder time winning reelection.
There is an aspect to totalitarianism we need to talk about: People believe what they are told to believe.
2/ The latest chapter in the saga of the radicalization of the Republican Party centers on Liz Cheney, who may be ousted from her leadership position in the House because she refuses to capitulate to Trump’s big lie about the election.