In general, I respect Jimmy Dore, which is what makes the argument I'm having so wild and mind-blowing right now. Dore is arguing that keeping a mask mandate is anti-science and uses this quote. Lemme give you my take on this. 1/
He is arguing that the restrictions are detrimental, the key words in his supporting argument, in my mind, are the two words "MOST PEOPLE." 2/
Currently, California's vaccination rate is 38.35%, well under 50%, meaning that, honestly, "most people" aren't vaccinated. That fact alone should end the argument, but let's go a little further. 3/
SCIENCE SAYS: Herd immunity is reached when 70+% of the population is vaccinated, until then we're still dealing with the possibility of outbreaks. Currently, no state has 50% or more vaccinated. 4/
Furthermore, SCIENCE SAYS that the vaccine does not guarantee immunity. It reduces the severity of the illness if you do get sick and it greatly reduces the likelihood of spreading the virus, but it does not eliminate it. 5/
Right now, kids under 12 and the immunocompromised are most at risk. They can't get the vaccine. If you are vaccinated, catch the virus, and give it to your kid or your grandma who is fighting cancer, how are you going to feel? What if they die? 6/
Even if you don't have someone directly in YOUR life, you probably know someone who does. Is it worth it to know that a friend's kid could get sick? 7/
Even worse, I know at least 5 people personally who got the virus between the first and the second shot, when immunity was building up but it was still supposed to be difficult to catch it. They followed mask requirements and STILL CAUGHT IT. 8/
So, knowing that science supports the numbers for herd immunity and protecting the young and immunocompromised, I plan on wearing a mask until we reach 70% vaccinated in my state. To do any less is unthinkable. 9/
Furthermore, I am blown away at leftists arguing from a position of "Fuck you, got mine." And I hate that I have to point it out. We're supposed to be better than that. This timeline is the fucking worst. /END
Nick Sandmann, Brock Turner, Ethan “Affluenza” Couch, Brett Kavanaugh... These men, in conjunction with the Gillette Ad and it's aftermath, tell us something extremely important.
Yeah, society recognizes that men need to own their bad behavior... As long as they aren't rich or white.
People can try to point to Turner and Couch and argue that they spent time in jail. That is both laughable and insulting. (I've reached the thread limit, so bear with me here)
(LONG THREAD) A little over a week ago, Gillette released their “The Best Men Can Be” ad, and the internet exploded. Gillette said: “Men, we can do better.” A very vocal, very male portion of the internet burst through the wall like the Kool-Aid Man to bay: “NOT ALL MEN!”
A lot of people agreed with them, though. They agreed that it was time more men started speaking out against a “Boys will be Boys” culture, a culture where women are, even unintentionally, discounted. That lasted about a week.
Over the weekend, the anti-choice “March for Life” happened in Washington DC. Ben Shapiro made an idiotic comment about Baby Hitler, but that became overshadowed by a completely different event and conversation. The Covington Catholic boys.
More on the #CovingtonCatholic debacle. PART 2 -- AFTERMATH AND ANALYSIS (now with even more sources)
There appears to be a horrible culture brewing at CCH. It is, as stated, an all male school staffed entirely by a white administration. Any students of diversity are pretty much hazed.
First of all, they weren't "black muslims," they were member of the Black Hebrew Israelites sect, a rather extremist group based in Black Judaism. As someone said: "If you're from the hood, you know to ignore them."