1/ Québec just announced it is going to pour $10bn and counting in a what is now called the Réseau Express de la Capitale.
- $3.3bn will go toward the tramway project (20km)
- $6-7bn toward a 8km road tunnel (with bus lanes...)
- $600m for bus lanes and other improvements
2/ The tramway project is more or less the same announced a few years ago, albeit with a different Eastern terminus.
Unfortunately, the project lost the rest of the "Réseau Structurant" network it was part of, that comprised BRT, bus lanes too. But budget remained the same...
3/ $3.3bn for 20 km makes it $165m/km, one of the costliest tramways in history.
The average cost for Modern European Tramways Québec one is modeled from is around €30-40m/km
-> $50-70m/km
The short central tunnel section alone does not justify that astronomical budget, IMO
4/ The biggest part of the cake ($6-7bn as for preliminary estimates) goes to the pet project of the ruling party: the Troisième Lien (third link), a road tunnel connecting Lévis with Québec.
Peanuts goes to improved bus corridors bounded to motorway widening schemes...
5/ What is even more shocking is that this gargantuan plan is for a metro area of 800k inhabitants and that the tunnel will connect Québec city with the megalopolis of Lévis with its astronomical population of 145k inhabitants. The expected 50k vehicles day looks even optimistic
6/ As a matter of comparison, the Mobility plan of Bologna's metropolitan city (1m inhabitants) calls for €2bn in investment over 15 years, with only €88m (4%) for road construction, the rest is for a 50km tramway network, bike infras (€165m), BRTs, regional rail etc.
7/ As always in Canada, those gigantic plans wort zillions of $$$ come about putting together random pet projects in a very consensus-seeking way, to make everybody happy, without a comprehensive vision or a clear goal in terms of modal shift, GES reduction, livability, etc.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ I've always been persuaded that most policymakers have little understanding of the spatial implications of their policies. That because policymaking is mostly dominated by discursive and econometric logics.
An example? Electric cars charging stations.
I will explain why
2/ With the next generation EU and Biden's infrastructure plan taking shape, the economic and environmental opportunities and trade-offs of electrifying cars have been discussed a lot in the public debate. Important resources have been committed to expand charging infrastructure
3/ But beyond energy and economy, there is an impact that has almost not been mentioned: where will this charging station be actually built? They won't exist in theory, out of our Euclidean space. They will need to make their space in a congested urban environment.
One of Bari's suburban rails owned by FSE (Ferrovie del Sud-Est) has been finally completely wired and provided with SCMT (Positive Train Control). The new timetable is now a perfect 30 minutes clockface, albeit limited to a 5AM-9:30PM operation. It's a single track line
We tend to overlook Puglia in the national transit discourse, but it's probably the only southern region outside Campania that has a decent transit network, an urban form conducive for transit (dense, compact towns) and actually invested in more service, not only new infra
The result is that Puglia is the only southern region that has seen a steady ridership increase in its local rail network: from 108k/day in 2011 to 150k/day in 2019 (+40%) while Sicily, a much larger region, is stuck at 45k/day and Campania plummeted by 44%, losing 200k/day
1/ I see a lot of "terminological confusion" under the sun, when we talk about train service, especially in a cross-Atlantic comparative perspective
So, I did a quick, and uncomplete, chart to help us all talk about that more clearly.
Here it is, with a short explanation thread
2/ A topology of rail service is a complicate task, because rail services exists in a spectrum and not in watertight categories. But using the average speed/average station distance metrics we can identify a few large clusters of rail service types
3/ Starting from the bottom-left, we have the large family of suburban/regional rail service. Those are rail services targeting the daily mobility needs of an urban region, from commuting to everything else. Their average speed is relatively low and stop spacing close (<10km)
Thanks to @BrendanDawe I discovered the Atlas of the French rail network published yearly by SNCF-Réseau (formerly RFF). There are a few interesting graphics about regional rail service intensity
Here is Paris (No RER A and B because RATP is another planet, not worth mapping :-)
Here is the whole country. France outside the Î-d-F confirms to be a bunch of provincial capital surrounded by the Great Nothingness :-P
And, of course, "La diagonal du vide (ferroviaire)"
Please note traffic generated by commuting to Luxembourg from the Meuse area (Metz/Nancy)
On the freight side, I'm surprised by the little numbers of daily trains. But I admit that freight is not my stuff, so I don't really know how these numbers compare to other corridors in EU or outside.
1/ Official news are out that the money for metro rail in the Italian recovery fund will go toward a 11km extension of Catania's 🚇metro system.
Here is make a thread about a system that started its life not so well, but has a very good potential for the future.
2/ Catania's metro has long been the tiniest metro system in Italy, contending this not so enviable title with Genova. It's still the least used one, with some 20k/day users in 2019 (7M/year).
But what is the history behind a system that is atypical in the Italian context?
3/ Catania is a 300k city with some 7-800k inhabitants in a metropolitan area spreading along the Eastern coast of Sicily and on the fertile foothills of Etna, cultivated with wine, pistachios, oranges, lemons, prickly pears🤤 etc.
1/ The relationship between the city and the rail is one that has defined urban development. The station front is, definitely, where that relationship is at its finest.
A thread about the "Piazza della Stazione", a piece of urban fabric you rarely see in England or the US
2/ One might say: a station is a station everywhere, what else? It's a series of tracks with platforms, maybe a vaulted steel canopy and a main building with passenger facilities.
But how does that interact with the urban fabric it's built within? Not in the same way everywhere
3/ Take London and its countless stations. They are nested within the urban fabric, bended and twisted to squeeze into a quite chaotically developed urban fabric. Many don't have a proper urban façade or a particularly defined public space in front of them.