1] Some time in 2017, the ever excitable Baba Bertha, then MDC-T SG, issued a statement stating that MDC-T would field candidates in "alliance partners allocated seats"
MDC-T Leader then, Pres MRT quickly issued a statement rubbishing both his SG & the unsanctioned statement
2] In 2021, Baba Collins pushes for unpopular & illegal constitutional amendments
He is successful challenged in court and his government legal adviser & Minister of Justice issues a strong worded statement attacking the courts, MDC-A, lawyers & pretty much everything that moves
3] Feeling embarrassed, Baba Collins sends the Justice Ministry Perm Sec to cryptically rubbish her Boss' press statement and effectively attempts to distance the government from it.
Unconvinced by the shallow climp-down, Baba Collins' twitter account sends the tweet above
4] But now, to whom is the message by the Justice Ministry PS & ED's intended?
Who should know that "our courts should be respected" & perhaps aren't captured?
Who had said something to the contrary?
To whom & on who's behalf was the person speaking?
What will happen to them?
5] The apology should be as loud as the disrespect surely!
But then, everyone knows there is no sincere apology here.
It's a regime failing to come to terms with its humiliating defeat, & the subsequent social media backlash & court challenges against gov's contempt of court.
6] Two things should be clear
1stly, Social media is effective, & is proving a thorn in Zanu's flesh.
2ndly, Ziyambi, who serves on the mercy of ED, was speaking on his behalf when he issued that statement.
We already know:
"qui facit per alium, facit per se"
enkosi!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1] I guess when you are fortunate enough to own and drive private vehicles, and only know about the existence of Zupco from news reports on the purchasing/donation of new busses, then the whole monopolization has worked.
If you commute daily, this claim by SK is an insult.
When some of us tweeted against Mwonzora from 2018/19, (before it became fashionable), the accusation was that "we had picked Chamisa's faction"
It was particularly strange because "we" had no known political footprints then, in the MDC affairs.
2] It was thus strange, to be treated as supporters of one faction against the other.
Some preferred characterising the Khupe/Mwonzora-Chamisa battles as mere Tsvangirai succession, even when signs became evident, that ZanuPF had developed an interest and indeed taken over.
3] The tragedy in Zimbabwe, is that the constitution is treated as merely a political document.
It's owned & handed over to the winner of the next election, after every 5 years.
If the constitution was a baby, then in 2008 & 2013, ZanuPF had the discomfort of co-parenting.
1] Sadly you were right Sekuru @Wamagaisa,not that it was too difficult to call, truth be told.
@OurMDCT has voted WITH ZanuPF even after that fake PR speech in Senate by VaMwonzora & the subsequent claim by @witness_dube that they wouldn't allow CAB2 to pass without amendments.
1] Mukoma @DavidHofisi, your reasoning is respectfully shallow, and plays straight into ill-willed hands of the proponents of this draconian piece of "non-existent" legislation (read bill).
I shall respectfully establish why I strongly feel you're wrong.
2] Firstly, all students of history, and those who yearn for constitutionalism & rule of law, should find consensus in ridiculing proposals for the legislation of patriotism by a political party.
Patriotism has an unambiguous meaning, & doesnt need legislation.
1] My mind is troubled by the charge and conviction of my brother @MakomboreroH
Some of us who have engaged him here and elsewhere, acknowledge that he is a well-meaning young patriot who just wants a functional, democratic Zimbabwe where constitutionalism is the norm.
2] To then think history will record that @MakomboreroH was convicted for "inciting violence" is ridiculous.
In his political journey, he has stood up for others, and has championed a cause that promotes the respect for fundamental human rights.
He deserves no place in prison.
3] Yet there is a clear logic to this madness.
Have extensively "tweeted" about how ZanuPF prefers an Opposition that "knows its place".
One that "contributes to development", not one that pushes the "regime change agenda", yet the constitution allows for it.