When some of us tweeted against Mwonzora from 2018/19, (before it became fashionable), the accusation was that "we had picked Chamisa's faction"
It was particularly strange because "we" had no known political footprints then, in the MDC affairs.
2] It was thus strange, to be treated as supporters of one faction against the other.
Some preferred characterising the Khupe/Mwonzora-Chamisa battles as mere Tsvangirai succession, even when signs became evident, that ZanuPF had developed an interest and indeed taken over.
3] The tragedy in Zimbabwe, is that the constitution is treated as merely a political document.
It's owned & handed over to the winner of the next election, after every 5 years.
If the constitution was a baby, then in 2008 & 2013, ZanuPF had the discomfort of co-parenting.
4] In contrast, the constitution is more than political.
Its administrative in that it creates checks & balances.
Its economic in that safeguards both individuals & national economic interests
Its social & progressive as well.
For us, the fixation remains with the "political"!
5] True to this treatment of the constitution as a political document, ZanuPF has engineered 2 amendments so far.
Both of which are political & being spearheaded by politicians.
ZanuPF is reimagining & amending the constitution in its political image.
But it needed help....
6] After failing to prevent the prevailing of their interest from the 2008 elections, and the 2013 referendum, ZanuPF embraced contentious clauses, & waited for political changes in 2018.
Sadly,they didnt win 2018 enough to "fully own" the constitution
Enter Douglas Mwonzora..
7] I once argued that neither one of the MDC factions possess what it requires to "win" the battles won by Mwonzora so far, in Zimbabwe.
ZanuPF simply opened a way for him & the effects of this political promiscuity are being faced, as the devil runs away with our bible.
8] But here's what I'm angling at...
Whereas the coup regime has no qualms whatsoever with blatant illegal acts, they equally have a craving for legislating their unpopular actions.
They now want to legalise, being draconian & dictatorial.
This explains these amendments!
9] As far as the Legislation of Dictatorship is concerned, elections work.
ZanuPF couldn't have succeeded with these amendments without the help of the "Opposition" & the capture Chiefs & the voting system itself.
The outcome of 2018 could have successfully stopped these CABs
10] As a way forward we need to:
•replace voter apathy with voter education
•devise ways of politically responding to illegal & draconian amendments
•denounce pseudo Opposition enablers
•resoundingly make an electoral statement come 2023
1] Sadly you were right Sekuru @Wamagaisa,not that it was too difficult to call, truth be told.
@OurMDCT has voted WITH ZanuPF even after that fake PR speech in Senate by VaMwonzora & the subsequent claim by @witness_dube that they wouldn't allow CAB2 to pass without amendments.
1] Mukoma @DavidHofisi, your reasoning is respectfully shallow, and plays straight into ill-willed hands of the proponents of this draconian piece of "non-existent" legislation (read bill).
I shall respectfully establish why I strongly feel you're wrong.
2] Firstly, all students of history, and those who yearn for constitutionalism & rule of law, should find consensus in ridiculing proposals for the legislation of patriotism by a political party.
Patriotism has an unambiguous meaning, & doesnt need legislation.
1] My mind is troubled by the charge and conviction of my brother @MakomboreroH
Some of us who have engaged him here and elsewhere, acknowledge that he is a well-meaning young patriot who just wants a functional, democratic Zimbabwe where constitutionalism is the norm.
2] To then think history will record that @MakomboreroH was convicted for "inciting violence" is ridiculous.
In his political journey, he has stood up for others, and has championed a cause that promotes the respect for fundamental human rights.
He deserves no place in prison.
3] Yet there is a clear logic to this madness.
Have extensively "tweeted" about how ZanuPF prefers an Opposition that "knows its place".
One that "contributes to development", not one that pushes the "regime change agenda", yet the constitution allows for it.
I give a summary of the critical points raised by Dr. Magaisa on how the @mdczimbabwe can push for "reforms", by being more inward looking, in terms of how the party can prepare itself for a fight against ZanuPF, as well as generally improving its operations.
Dr. Magaisa classifies party support as follows:
i. Vietnam/Soweto Section- diehard
ii. Moderate
iii. Floaters
The critical thing is understanding these types of supporters and how they can be kept involved & interested in party activities.
3] b. Party Structures
The split with the Mwonzora faction can not be treated as a non-event.
The organizing depart has to run a gap filling exercise as well as, mobilizing, restructuring & energizing party structures.
The restructuring exercise should also target rural areas.
1] Who else remembers Dugish Mohadi blaming the whites for not "teaching us how to manage the economy" post independence?
One wonders who then taught him how to allegedly manhandle his ex wife; chase after married woman and have unprotected sex in his government office.
2] Studies of history & cultures expose how sex was very much used as "an expression of power & authority", particularly during the liberation war.
Now, Kembo is an adult, and I'm certainly not treating him as a victim.
I'm rather wondering how things could have been different.
3] Some of our current leaders, from the liberation generation jumped into offices when they needed to get psychiatric help to help reintegrate them into society.
Some, in so many ways, express a lack of remorse, empathy, humility & humanity, which perhaps once kept them going