If Biden had lost, wld we still be content taking Krebs’ “word” that the election was secure? It’s great that Krebs got fired by Trump & all, but not a sufficient basis on which to bet our entire future. Comey got fired too. Both = Rs. Neither transparent. #EvidenceBasedElections
I show in this video how Comey spread the lie of “no internet connectivity” to voting systems in 2016. Even if Comey didn’t know it was a lie in 2016, Krebs certainly knew it was a lie when he tried to say the same thing after the 2020 election. 1/
What an embarrassment for Krebs to be corrected by an agent of the Kremlin. To have the bad guys catch u “massaging the truth” (lying) helps the bad guys. 2/
Ds must stop it w/ the savior syndrome. Krebs got election offices to use two-step authentication. CISA scanned some vendors’ systems but won’t say which. They put censors on voter registration systems. But they decided it was ok to connect the voting systems to the internet. 3/
4/
5/ Krebs later claimed that CISA advised election officials orally to remove the modems. Um, why not in writing?!
Krebs giving the VP of ES&S (of the secret remote access software and secret internet connectivity) a certificate of appreciation in February 2019. 6/
7/ Soon after Krebs gave that certificate of appreciation to ES&S, researchers found ES&S systems online. Can’t make this stuff up. It is inexcusable. nbcnews.com/politics/elect…
8/ And them Krebs tries to get away with falsely claiming our election was secure bc voting machines don’t connect to the internet?! A little after 1:23. hsgac.senate.gov/examining-irre…
I read the Trump-backed voter suppression bill, the so-called “Save America Act,” so you don’t have to. Here’s my summary. Please tell your Senators to vote NO on this abomination: 202-224-3121. TY. 1/
You can read the Trump-backed “Save America Act” for yourself here. This bill expands upon the original so-called “SAVE Act”. 2/ congress.gov/119/bills/hr72…
3/ Here’s a link to the Brennan Center’s July 2025 report warning about the problems with both the SAVE System and the Social Security Number database when used to purge voters from the voter rolls, as would occur under the “Save America Act”. Everyone should read it. brennancenter.org/our-work/resea…
The SAVE America Act’s list of approved citizenship documentation is at the top. Marriage certificates are *not* included, effectively disenfranchising many of the 69M women whose last names don’t match their birth certificates (not an issue for those who buy expensive passports or have “Enhanced Drivers Licenses” that do match) 1/
The GOP’s “SAVE America Act” has a list of approved citizenship documentation for voters. It includes Real IDs that “indicate citizenship,” which misleads bc most Real IDs *don’t* indicate citizenship & thus won’t suffice.
The list also does *not* include marriage certificates, effectively disenfranchising many of the 69M women whose last names don’t match their birth certificates (not an issue for those w/ passports or Enhanced Drivers Licenses that do match). #NoOnSAVE #ProtectOurVotes 1/
Rs are using public confusion over Real ID to advance their deceptive Save America Act. In reality, for most voters, a Real ID will *not* suffice to prove citizenship under the Act—even if they presented a birth certificate to get it. Tell ur Senators #NoOnSAVE. 202-224-3121 1/
The GOP’s “SAVE Act” has a list of approved citizenship documentation for voters. It includes Real IDs that “indicate citizenship,” which is highly misleading bc most REAL IDs *don’t* indicate citizenship, per the DHS.
The list also does *not* include marriage certificates, effectively disenfranchising many of the 69M women whose last names don’t match their birth certificates (not an issue for those w/ passports or Enhanced Drivers Licenses that do match). #NoOnSAVE #ProtectOurVotes 1/
Most Real IDs do *not* prove citizenship. (EDLs, which are available in only 5 states are an exception) The GOP’s “SAVE” Act thus misleads when it says voters can prove citizenship w/ “ID issued consistent w/ the reqmts of…REAL ID…that indicates the applicant is a citizen…” 1/