Here are the kinds of things that are indicators of a vexatious FOI request
I hope the requester puts in for an internal review (the next stage in the FOI process)
The reasons for refusal are shocking
... intention of criticising any org which submits applications to Stonewall.
... with the intention of discrediting and undermining them as a charitable
... org, whose role is to support people in the LGBT community & to help orgs promote & encourage diversity in the workplace.
...the spirit of this request is to further a campaign against Stonewall and its partners/clients"
The new priesthood.
Ordinary rules dont apply
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I am also an advocate of people sitting around talking for solving problems (what else is there?)
Orgs exist to do this - it's what justifies their overhead cost.
This is the office of CGD Europe where I used to work. You can see the Palace of Westminster from the windows
When I started talking about this it was with the naive hope that CGD might use its sunlit meeting room to host a discussion amongst development professionals about sex and gender in their orgs & policy advocacy.
Fawcett and Felicia 's tweets get so little engagement from ordinary women outside of the Westminster-voluntary sector backslapping bubble that experiences women asking why Fawcett will not lift a finger for sex based rights as a pile on of abuse ...
I say this not to be mean to be Felicia
But because Fawcett is campaigning on online Harms