We all know that a 60 vote supermajority is needed in the US Senate in order to break the threat of a filibuster.

The thing is, this likely requires Senators who represent even MORE than 60% of the population to agree in order to get anything done. Image
If you view every US Senator as representing half of their state's population (since every state has two Senators), this means that the 50 Dem Senators represent 56.3% of the US population. And the 50 GOP Senators represent 43.7% of the US population.

This is just the way it is. Image
Our Founding Fathers constructed the Constitution to ensure that every state, regardless of population, had an equal voice in the upper chamber of Congress and had a voice in Presidential elections. The percentages here are weird but they're not wrong. It's the Constitution.
HOWEVER, when you implement the filibuster rule (something that is NOT in the Constitution) that says that 60% of the Senate has to agree in order to get anything done (combined with the fact that one of the two parties in the Senate has publicly promised to cooperate on nothing)
the net effect of this is that a collection of Senators representing an extremely large percentage of the population is required to get anything done.

Look at the ideology rankings of the GOP Senators, as assessed by GovTrack.
govtrack.us/congress/membe… Image
We can debate about whether the ideological rankings for 2020 computed by GovTrack reflect what we think of each Senator's position or not. But if 0.50 represents the ideological center, and you took the 10 GOP Senators closest to the center, they represent 23.59 million people.
And when you put it together mathematically, 50 Senators plus the 10 most ideologically centrist Republicans equals a group of Senators that represent 63.54% of the US Population.

Even MORE than the 60% of the Senate required to break the filibuster.

To get ANYTHING done. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with TheValuesVoter

TheValuesVoter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheValuesVoter

22 May
You cannot understand the psychology of Trumpism or of the modern Republican Party without understanding the deep and pervasive fear of demographic change among some whites in America.

They go hand in hand.
And, closely coupled with it is the legacy of the “Southern Strategy” and the strategic decisions that the Republican Party has made over the last five and a half decades, targeting mostly white voters while ignoring or showing active hostility to many other groups.
Any student or American history knows that in the Jim Crow and Civil Rights eras, a lot of the most xenophobic and racist rhetoric and policies spoken and enacted during those times came from southern Democrats.
Read 14 tweets
22 May
Something else about Arizona that corroborates the election results that Joe Biden won: voter registration statistics.
azsos.gov/elections/vote…
In Maricopa County, the number of registered Republicans rose from 840,167 in January, 2020 to 915,227 by November. An increase of 8.93%.

But the number of registered Democrats rose from 724,099 in January to 814,343 by November. An increase of 12.46%.
In the state’s second most populous county, Pima, the number of registered Republicans rose from 168,990 in January to 185,946 by November - an increase of 10.03%.

But the number of registered Democrats rose from 223,115 in January to 257,678 by November - an increase of 15.49%.
Read 17 tweets
21 May
Serious question. If the US Senate refuses to do anything because the @GOPSenate won’t cooperate on ANYTHING, even a commission to investigate 1/6 and because of a filibuster rule that doesn’t even require the opposing side to show up in person, shouldn’t everyone just go home?
I mean, if no work is going to get done and half of the Senate is vigorously committed to doing nothing at all, why should taxpayers pay to keep flying those guys and gals between their home states and DC?
If you’re going to do nothing, why should taxpayers pay for:

1) Their staffs and offices
2) Their travel expenses and per diem

Why not just shut the Senate down and keep it closed until one party has enough seats to get something done?

Or

Reform the Filibuster
Read 5 tweets
19 May
Currently, there are 50 Republican Senators and 50 Senators who caucus with the Democrats.

But the 50 Democratic Senators currently represent 41.5 million more people than the 50 Republican Senators do.

It's just the way it is.
Every state, regardless how large or small, is represented by two US Senators in the US Senate. This was constructed as a means of ensuring that every state has equal rights and representation in the Senate regardless of the number of people living in the state.
So every state is on a level playing field in the US Senate. All states are equally important. As our founders intended. Population ensures more representation in the US House of Representatives. The Senate ensures equality between the states.
Read 4 tweets
19 May
I have a HUGE problem with the Democratic Party's position on abortion. Anyone who has followed me for any length of time knows that.

That said and known, you also know that I study data. And I found something that surprised me that I'm going to dig into more deeply.
If you look at the CDC reports, the # of abortions reported to the CDC went down every year under Obama's tenure.
cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/6…

2018: 619,591
2017: 612,719
2016: 623,471
2015: 638,169
2014: 652,639
2013: 664,435
2012: 699,202
2011: 730,322
2010: 765,651
2009 - 789,217
Look it up yourself. Also, you can cross-check the beginning years of this period against a separate CDC report:
cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/m…

This surprised me. And so I started to look back even further.
Read 16 tweets
18 May
Washington

And finally, Washington State. Trump lost Washington by a larger margin than any Republican Presidential candidate since 1964.
So we've only got 50 states. And Trump performed worse in 10 of them than any Republican Presidential Nominee since before most of this years' high school graduates were even born.
Trump did worse in 2 of them than any Republican since the 1996 election, which was a race that involved a major third party candidate.

He did worse in another of them than any GOP candidate since the 1992 election, which also involved the same major third party candidate.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(