@jordanbpeterson@Breedlove22 A lot of people already answered, but I want to reply anyway. In short: it's misguided at best and disingenuous at worst. The premises are flawed, and the data cited is questionable.
People have been screaming "tulips!" since the very first days of bitcoin's monetization process. They will still be screaming when a fraction of a bitcoin will consistently buy you a nice house. They are misinformed.
"What happens if you lose your gold coins at the bottom of the sea?"
It's a bearer asset. This is a feature, not a bug. Bitcoin emphasizes the sovereignty of the individual in principle and practice.
@aantonop had a great response to that. Six years ago. This response is still valid and accurate today.
@jordanbpeterson@Breedlove22@aantonop Re: "a real world game of Monopoly where the objective becomes to take wealth from others rather than work both individually and collectively to raise living standards for all."
Sound money is key to a free and prosperous society. Bitcoin is the soundest money we ever had.
@jordanbpeterson@Breedlove22@aantonop All across the globe, volunteers and companies are working towards a better, fairer, faster, stronger, more egalitarian, more open societal operating system for the whole world.
Money transports value across spacetime and solves the combinatorial explosion of calculations in a barter economy. W/o money, a centralized computational entity would collapse into a black hole.
@jordanbpeterson@Breedlove22@aantonop Re 1b)
> He conceded that Bitcoin required protection from malicious actors and suggested U.S. government intervention to protect his investments.
The summary of the author hardly reflects what Pierre actually said.
It's closer to half of that, and it doesn't matter in the first place. Miners do not control Bitcoin. They serve the network. They do not control it. The outcome of Bitcoin's civil war showed this clearly.
The whole point of Bitcoin is to decentralize all aspects, building a resilient, even antifragile system in the process. Bitcoin's track record leads me to believe that it is sufficiently decentralized.
It's about security, not production. Issuance of new bitcoin is a side-effect of securing the network. New bitcoins are emitted, not produced. They are predetermined and uncorrelated to work.
If others can dictate how you use your money, it is not good money. Criminals will always use the best tool for the job. For ransom payments, it used to be unmarked bills and gold coins before that.
@jordanbpeterson@Breedlove22@aantonop Re 6a) I disagree with the premise. Bitcoin is extremely energy efficient. All the energy it uses is used for good: to secure the network. It is worth every kWh. Not having bitcoin would be the net waste.
@jordanbpeterson@Breedlove22@aantonop Re 6b) It is not surprising that most people use bitcoin as a savings vehicle first and foremost. We are living through the exponential monetization phase of the best money the world has ever seen. Exponential gains in purchasing power are to be expected.
@jordanbpeterson@Breedlove22@aantonop Re 7) I urge you to listen to the talk by @bitstein and read the article by @eiaine. I know you have an appreciation for rhetoric, dialectic, and memes, which is why I can't recommend @bitstein's talk highly enough.
@jordanbpeterson@Breedlove22@aantonop@bitstein@eiaine Re 8) Dogecoin shows that shitcoin-narrative of "better tech" is flawed. Bitcoin is the signal. Everything else is noise. Bitcoin separates money and state. It reintroduces sound money. It is an immaculate conception of absolute scarcity.
@jordanbpeterson@Breedlove22@aantonop@bitstein@eiaine Re 9) Bitcoin is no utopia, and I reject the premise that bitcoiners use fear-tactics. Bitcoiners are hopeful. Bitcoin is deterministic optimism. Hope, not fear. (With some memes sprinkled in.)
@jordanbpeterson@Breedlove22@aantonop@bitstein@eiaine Re 10b) "Bitcoin is text. Bitcoin is speech. It cannot be regulated in a free country like the USA with guaranteed inalienable rights and a First Amendment that explicitly excludes the act of publishing from government oversight." -- @Beautyon_
@jordanbpeterson@Breedlove22@aantonop@bitstein@eiaine@Beautyon_ Bitcoin's best critics tend to be bitcoiners. The quality of bitcoin criticism declines over time, most likely because all the good critics end up changing their minds, becoming bitcoiners in the process.
A failure to understand proof of work is a failure to understand #Bitcoin.
A thread. 🧵👇
Decentralized systems, by definition, do not have a single source of truth.
Satoshi's breakthrough was to build a system that allows all participants to zero in on the same truth independently. Proof of work is what allows this to happen.
The point of proof of work is to create an irrefutable history. If two histories compete, the one with the most work embedded in it wins.
The chain with the most work is the truth, by definition. This is what we call Nakamoto consensus.
#Bitcoin works in a very peculiar way. Our everyday experience doesn't map onto it nicely. Which is one of the reasons why I believe that trying to shoehorn it into concepts we are familiar with is a fool's errand. 🧵👇
First of all: public keys, private keys, addresses - even the software it self - it's all just numbers, which is to say information. Outlawing information gets very weird very quickly.
Second of all: on a technical level, every bitcoin transaction is a smelting process. Multiple inputs go in, multiple inputs go out. You can only connect inputs to outputs *heuristically*, never definitely.
Dear @MikhailaAleksis,
It was a pleasure meeting you in cyberspace today to talk #Bitcoin. For your convenience, I have collected some follow-up resources below. I am sharing them publicly so others might benefit from this list as well.