1/12 More than a decade in, most economists still fundamentally misunderstand #Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, #DeFi and #NFTs. In a piece for @ProSyn with @skominers and Ravi Jagadeesan, we write that:
2/12 "Societies create and maintain a consensus about money through a combination of technology and institutions. While technology can enable better forms of money, when and how such new forms are actually adopted depends critically...
3/12 ...on the presence or absence of complementary institutions. [...] Cryptocurrencies represent the latest iteration of this long historical process. [...] Beyond a clever new technology, what Nakamoto was (or were) really proposing was a new type of institutional arrangement.
4/12 With Bitcoin, reaching an agreement about the value of money does not require trusted third parties like central banks or financial intermediaries. [...] To the extent that we rely on institutions to ensure that the use of money adheres to our values and principles,...
5/12 ...Bitcoin’s design can become either a major strength or a serious weakness. In places where institutions are weak, undemocratic, or openly repressive, Bitcoin can provide its users with a more equal and robust store of value than anything they can access...
6/12 ...through the local financial system. [...] When people have come to enjoy sound monetary policy, a range of consumer protection laws, and government guarantees such as deposit insurance against bank failure,...
7/12 ...Bitcoin’s institution-light design may be less compelling, and its environmental costs seem all the more outrageous. Nonetheless, while some traditional institutions have been able to withstand fraught market and political conditions over the last few decades, Bitcoin...
8/12 ...and other cryptocurrencies remain an alternative for when those institutions turn out to be more fragile than expected. Similarly, cryptocurrencies can offer a way to restore competitive conditions when intermediaries have accumulated too much market power.
9/12 [...] Each cryptocurrency places different weights on key inputs such as technology, institutions, and the beliefs of its supporting tribe in the provision of money. [...]
10/12 While it may be tempting to think of cryptocurrencies as yet another instance in which “software is eating the world,” the journey from Bitcoin through DeFi to NFTs implies a much more nuanced interplay between code and institutions.
11/12 For any cryptocurrency experiment to last and be ultimately useful, society will need to develop complementary institutions supporting it.
12/12 Paradoxically, the types of constraints institutions may impose on crypto technology are precisely the ones that will allow the technology to channel our values and reach mainstream adoption." Full piece here: project-syndicate.org/onpoint/bitcoi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Christian Catalini

Christian Catalini Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ccatalini

3 Jul 19
1/8 Key misunderstandings in @JosephEStiglitz’s piece on @Libra_: the reserve is designed to build on the progress central banks have made in ensuring stability and value preservation. Libra is a complement to their monetary policies, not a substitute.
2/8 Libra is only minted and burned in response to market demand. The development of central bank digital currencies would be a positive development for Libra, as it would allow the reserve to integrate with them directly, increasing efficiency and robustness.
3/8 Libra is designed with the goal of reducing exactly the types of frictions in payments and financial services @JosephEStiglitz is worried about, increasing competition, driving lower fees for consumers, improving access and financial inclusion.
Read 8 tweets
18 Jun 19
Thanks @tylercowen for the post! Great questions, here are replies to some of them. All the issues you raise, and especially those we have not addressed directly, will be formalized by the Libra Association @Libra_ after gathering feedback from everyone in the ecosystem. 1/15
The documents we shared today are meant to be the start of a conversation with the open source and economic communities, as well as regulators.

(1) Libra will be backed by bank deposits and short-term government securities in currencies from a small number of stable... 2/15
...and reputable central banks.

(1b) Currency is fully backed, and custodians will be able to prove that they are not introducing fractionalization on top of the settlement layer. Even so, you raise an important issue @Libra_ will have to address. 3/15
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(