Is macroeconomics a science? Many of our problems come down to our misuse of economics. Accessible starting point for impactful analysis: @nephologue nephologue.blogspot.com/2018/08/is-mac…
Why this matters: Economics evolved for a growth regime, not for a full world, that approaches biophysical limits to growth. To share + accentuate @KevinClimate's concern: Do the physical climate sciences reflect & address the limitations of economics yet?
Can we learn to use economics in better, more humane ways?

This questions goes beyond natural sciences & engineering: many social scientists, & scholars in the humanities, routinely use sophisticated quantitative & qualitative toolboxes. Let's use them where it matters 🙏

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Maidowski

Paul Maidowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_ppmv

21 May
Common sense, apparently controversial: 👇 I don’t think scientists should tell us how many children to have—even less than governments should. 1/3
Some scientists promote simplistic, ethically fraught, mainstream economics-based calculations of “CO2 per child”, but this is weak, not very credible research—some would call it neoliberal victim-blaming. It just shows a lack of systems thinking - and it’s not even necessary 2/3
Wondering myself whether I want to have children, so this type of neoliberal hogwash gives me nothing, it just bores me. There are so many ways to ask better questions. 3/3
Read 4 tweets
19 May
Dear energy & climate analysts: great example why most of our analyses are pure fantasy, incl. #NetZero. It’s just not possible, full stop. I imagine we will do better with more empathy and international experience.
This is vital: Most social-climate models & the resulting 'analyses' that inform and legitimize politics have turned into mythmaking machines. As @w_knorr warns, it's easy to imagine inhumane ends to this power grab. On the misuse of economics: @SFuntowicz sciencedirect.com/science/articl… Image
How easily experts chime into the naive-regular chants of "what a breakthrough, @IEA acknowledges physics." Great.

Dear all, can we focus on learning critical thinking? No joke, maybe start with Roy Scranton's essay (here talk): What is Thinking Good For?
Read 5 tweets
10 May
To see how absurd + damaging the term 'inactivist' is: consider that MM uses it to describe activists (incl. me 🤷‍♂️) who don't support his (!) views, because we feel that he doesn't read the social science literature correctly. Nor even Jevons' paradox: 1/2
Even @michaelemann can't ignore basic thermodynamics: Check out Tim Garrett's decade-long & largely ignored line of research. The dynamics of our planet are not going to budge because some climate people would like them to. Let's be better than this. 🙏esd.copernicus.org/articles/3/1/2… 2/2
This tweet 👆 was just to test how I can interact with MM, who blocked me (I don't mind; indeed grateful for uncluttering my TL), along with many other climate activists working in good faith (many of whom mind & take it personally).

If this helps anyone:
Read 12 tweets
9 May
The Gandalf of Climate Change just dropped a 2h video, of "advice to Young People as they face annihilation." Invitation to join me in watching it, and comment / write / process as you see fit. IF you feel like writing a piece or poem and sharing—DMs open:
Thanks @RogerHallamCS21, for taking us & what's ahead seriously, and rising to the occasion. Hi everyone else, what's keeping you all? Don't you get tired of running in foreseeably self-defeating circles?
~First, you don't need to watch this video. If you don't agree or prefer doing something else, that's fine. It's your life.
Read 26 tweets
8 May
Running out of variations on the evergreen theme of growth. I have no idea how serious scientists claim there to be social "tipping points" away from growth, with zero empirical evidence. Does anyone assume people & organizations will voluntarily shrink themselves? How? Why? Who? Image
Great quote, too, & research I'm just starting to read up on: @CareyWKing
One genuine parallel between climate & pandemic, as two high-order global problems in which even the experts whose models inform or legitimize policy remain reluctant to rethink: for fear of having to change. nytimes.com/2021/05/07/opi… Image
Read 4 tweets
8 May
Why do so few of us dare to speak as clearly as Greta? Part of the picture is that the rate of atmospheric CO2 increase will jump from ~2.5 ppm/year to ~4-6 ppm/year within ~20 years under business as usual, as terrestrial carbon sinks weaken. Obviously not reflected in public 🤷‍♂️
Context: the Arctic shifted into a new (soon sea-ice free) regime. We all know emergency action is necessary to refreeze it. If that's impossible, we're headed for unsurvivable Miocene worlds

We owe people the respect to be ~at least~ honest with them 🙏
Before @ClimateOfGavin or anyone else again trivializes what "Unsurvivable" means: "U" for civilization in its current complexity (= quality of life)

Primitive tribes of humans may well hang on indefinitely, but even this requires extraordinary action now
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(