Also, many people don't know that lead is still allowed in aviation gasoline, because the FAA thinks "no safe alternative is currently available". faa.gov/news/fact_shee…
With the advent of electrified light planes, though, we now have a safe and superior alternative. cnn.com/travel/article…
Electric light planes are far quieter and far more reliable than those powered by aviation gasoline. This is a market segment that should be electrified ASAP, to capture those benefits and phase out leaded gasoline. #ElectrifyEverything
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Our rebuttal: Masanet, Eric, Arman Shehabi, Nuoa Lei, Harald Vranken, Jonathan Koomey, and Jens Malmodin. 2019. "Implausible projections overestimate near-term Bitcoin CO2 emissions." Nature Climate Change. vol. 9, no. 9. 2019/09/01. pp. 653-654. [doi.org/10.1038/s41558…]
We reproduced the authors' model almost exactly, so we know what they did. We showed that their conclusions made no sense in several ways, but the authors just denied the validity of our valid points in their riposte to our rebuttal.
Setting a coal phase-out date (2030 or sooner for developed countries) is the most important single step most nations can take on climate. Of course it's not the only necessary step, but it's a big one.
This is another example of a critically important constraint on the supply side (it's not just about reducing demand).
Green, Fergus, and Richard Denniss. 2018. "Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies." Climatic Change. 2018/03/12. [doi.org/10.1007/s10584…]
@rustneversleepz That was a widely cited article but it wasn’t state of the art at the time. I emailed Socolow in 2009 to explain his mistake of saying keeping emissions constant was a reasonable goal which he said elsewhere also. Still have the email.
@rustneversleepz This was state of the art in 2003, from @KenCaldeira Caldeira, Ken, Atul K. Jain, and Martin I. Hoffert. 2003. "Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty and the Need for Energy Without CO2 Emission " Science. vol. 299, no. 5615. pp. 2052-2054. <sciencemag.org/cgi/content/ab…>
@rustneversleepz@KenCaldeira This was state of the art in 1989 (!): Krause, Florentin, Wilfred Bach, and Jon Koomey. 1989. From Warming Fate to Warming Limit: Benchmarks to a Global Climate Convention. El Cerrito, CA: International Project for Sustainable Energy Paths. <files.me.com/jgkoomey/9jzwgj>
OK, #energytwitter, I'm wondering if anyone has recent references giving data on embodied/embedded/manufacturing emissions for electronic devices of all types.
This is great, but it's 8 years old now: Teehan, Paul, and Milind Kandlikar. 2013. "Comparing Embodied Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Modern Computing and Electronics Products." Environmental Science & Technology. vol. 47, no. 9. 2013/05/07. pp. 3997-4003. doi.org/10.1021/es3030…
This looks good: Clément, L-P P. V. P., Quentin E. S. Jacquemotte, and L M. Hilty. 2020. "Sources of variation in life cycle assessments of smartphones and tablet computers." Environmental Impact Assessment Review. vol. 84, 2020/09/01/. pp. 106416. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Lyman is right here. Travel bans are an important part of pandemic response, and the more quickly they're implemented in a pandemic, the better off we'll be.
Of course, they are one part of a more comprehensive strategy that involves getting to zero transmission, extensive testing and tracing, masking, and eventually vaccines. Travel bans themselves won't do the job, but as part of a strategy to get to zero transmission, they work.
Related: The idea of "managing" respiratory pandemics is invalid. Getting to zero transmission (as NZ, Australia, and the Canadian Atlantics have done) is the right goal, and we need to remember that for next time.