Once upon a time in a country called America, a power-hungry political party called the GOP enjoyed about fifteen years of poll-defying victories after ensuring that America’s election system made it impossible to prove fraud. 1/
2/ They got away w/ it bc Democrats almost always conceded without a fight and because anyone who suspected fraud was called “tin foil” since they couldn’t prove it.
3/ America’s 2020 election flipped this situation on its head.
4/ After blocking Democratic legislation that wld have made it possible to prove whether fraud had occurred or not (by requiring robust manual audits 4 all federal races), the GOP claimed without proof that the election lost by their candidate, an infamous conman, was fraudulent.
5/ The GOP did this even though all the polls predicted that the conman would lose.
6/ In response, the Democratic Party overstated the security of the election and made no effort to try to conduct meaningful manual audits of their own poll-defying House and Senate losses.
7/ The GOP, despite having blocked legislation that would have required meaningful manual audits 4 all federal races & vendors, set out to bolster their baseless election-fraud narrative by conducting propaganda #fraudits of just one race & one vendor in cherry-picked counties.
8/ In response, the Democrats decided to NOT reintroduce legislation to require meaningful manual audits in the next election (2022) because doing so might bolster the GOP’s claim that the 2020 election was insecure.
9/ This was a problem because the system really was insecure. The GOP had made it that way by thwarting the Democrats’ efforts to fix it.
10/ Democratic voters might have insisted that their elected leaders reintroduce or write new legislation to make the system secure and transparent for the next election. But no one told them the truth, so no one knew to speak up, much less what specific changes to demand.
11/ The Democratic Party and media had fallen victim to a deadly group think. They had decided that maintaining public trust in elections meant pretending elections were more secure than they were.
12/ Sadly, this is not a fable. It is the all too true story of electronic voting in the United States.
13/ I am sounding the sound the alarm. Without the truth of how we got here and where we are and who is responsible, meaningful election-security reform and a happy ending to the American experiment may elude us.
I read the Trump-backed voter suppression bill, the so-called “Save America Act,” so you don’t have to. Here’s my summary. Please tell your Senators to vote NO on this abomination: 202-224-3121. TY. 1/
You can read the Trump-backed “Save America Act” for yourself here. This bill expands upon the original so-called “SAVE Act”. 2/ congress.gov/119/bills/hr72…
3/ Here’s a link to the Brennan Center’s July 2025 report warning about the problems with both the SAVE System and the Social Security Number database when used to purge voters from the voter rolls, as would occur under the “Save America Act”. Everyone should read it. brennancenter.org/our-work/resea…
The SAVE America Act’s list of approved citizenship documentation is at the top. Marriage certificates are *not* included, effectively disenfranchising many of the 69M women whose last names don’t match their birth certificates (not an issue for those who buy expensive passports or have “Enhanced Drivers Licenses” that do match) 1/
The GOP’s “SAVE America Act” has a list of approved citizenship documentation for voters. It includes Real IDs that “indicate citizenship,” which misleads bc most Real IDs *don’t* indicate citizenship & thus won’t suffice.
The list also does *not* include marriage certificates, effectively disenfranchising many of the 69M women whose last names don’t match their birth certificates (not an issue for those w/ passports or Enhanced Drivers Licenses that do match). #NoOnSAVE #ProtectOurVotes 1/
Rs are using public confusion over Real ID to advance their deceptive Save America Act. In reality, for most voters, a Real ID will *not* suffice to prove citizenship under the Act—even if they presented a birth certificate to get it. Tell ur Senators #NoOnSAVE. 202-224-3121 1/
The GOP’s “SAVE Act” has a list of approved citizenship documentation for voters. It includes Real IDs that “indicate citizenship,” which is highly misleading bc most REAL IDs *don’t* indicate citizenship, per the DHS.
The list also does *not* include marriage certificates, effectively disenfranchising many of the 69M women whose last names don’t match their birth certificates (not an issue for those w/ passports or Enhanced Drivers Licenses that do match). #NoOnSAVE #ProtectOurVotes 1/
Most Real IDs do *not* prove citizenship. (EDLs, which are available in only 5 states are an exception) The GOP’s “SAVE” Act thus misleads when it says voters can prove citizenship w/ “ID issued consistent w/ the reqmts of…REAL ID…that indicates the applicant is a citizen…” 1/