A rigorous investigation of Canada's C19 response and the murky operations of PHAC has become evident to those both inside and outside gov't. By any stretch of the imagination, the C19 response was a self inflicted wound and monumental policy failure. 1/
A royal commission fully funded to do deep investigative work is critical. It must be led by someone with a stellar track record of jurisprudence, integrity and independence. I suggest Beverly McLachlin, Canada's former chief justice. 2/
No stone should be left unturned as this debacle should never be repeated. This commission will need to define and provide policy solutions for PHAC's long stream of administrative/scientific failures. Two elements stand out. 3/
First, Canada needs to seriously reconsider its relationship with the WHO. Its pyramidal structure of pandemic coordination and weak/ politically driven leadership is a serious liability not easily fixed. They aren't up to the task and it's time to stop pretending otherwise. 4/
A royal commission should also ponder a complete restructuring of PHAC, even consider its complete dissolution. There is precedent, consider the tainted blood scandal in the early 1990's which brought about Canadian Blood Services. 5/
Much more to ponder on this topic but these are a few thoughts to start the process. The C19 failure is serious and it will shake the very foundation of governance over the coming months. End.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Donald Welsh

Donald Welsh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DonaldWelsh16

17 May
I remember a MP named Sven Robinson. Young, passionate and openly gay when that was a liability. At a party, he walked away with a piece of jewelry, a flight of fancy. A week later, he rose in parliament, admitted his error and resigned. It was simple, he had broken trust. 1/
It was an act that left an indelible mark on a younger version of me. It framed my view of what it meant to be a public figure. It instilled faith in the political process and reminded me how seriously public officials took their actions and responsibilities. 2/
Here, some 30 years later, many Canadians sit with their trust in gov't shattered by a public health community that has been disturbing incorrect and inflexible. It has walled itself off and retreated into ideology and archane theory. 3/
Read 6 tweets
16 May
Superb journalism by Trish Woods interviewing Nicholas Wade (former NYT journalist). In careful detail, Mr. Wade discusses the origins of C19, leading you to a logical conclusion. It must have come from the Wuhan Lab, a gain of function experiment. 1/

podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cov…
Its two hours in length and the approach is methodical, as the two careful weigh the evidence left at the so called "crime scene". There is nuance and it's thought provoke. It's a welcome change from the thoughtless propaganda of commercial TV. 2/
From day 1, Canada's C19 response has appeared rather misguided and aimless. There was always a piece of the puzzle missing, that being an accurate accounting for the origins of C19. The natural emergence hypothesis lacked evidence and credibility. 3/
Read 6 tweets
14 May
15 months into the C19 response and Canadians are confronted with an unflattering reality. Contrary to our national myth of "sound governance" we find ourselves devoid of leadership and being slowly suffocated by empty platitudes and virtue signaling. 1/
From the local to the federal level, leaders are adrift, too scared to face the truth. That being our public health response to C19 has been an abject failure from start-to-finish. Our leaders lacked either the fortitude or skill to stop it. 2/
Canada's C19 response should have been stopped on day 1. Claims of viral lethality and efficiacy of NPIs/vaccines were wildly exaggerated. Instead of walking back these claims, public health embraced them, creating interlocking layers of incoherent policy. 3/
Read 6 tweets
11 May
Your weekly reminder that you are living through the largest social policy blunder in Canadian history. So much to discuss in regards to C19, but lets take a cue from Anthony Furey and keep it simple. 1/
Lost in the noise of Canada's ever aimlessly public health campaign are simple facts. Under the age of 40, the risk of death/hospitalization is stunningly small and arguably lower than the flu. C19 is a highly age/risk statified respiratory illness. 2/
This was appreciated early by actuaries, who make a living studying death curves. Ever wonder why life insurance rates didn't go up with the arrival of a new respiratory virus. Its because C19 didn't materially impact the risk profile of the people they insure. 3/
Read 12 tweets
8 May
Warren Kinsella succinctly noted yesterday the collapse of "trust" in gov't and its messaging. Unsurprising given the poor public health campaign without a comparator in modern Canadian history. 1/

Coercive public health campaigns have a start and an end point (vaccination). Everything in between supports a preset story line. Official statements need not be accurate, they are manipulative and designed to challenge your sense of emotional/physical security. 2/
Needless to say, it's a disingenuous way to treat citizens and such campaigns are highly corrosive to society. They are typically reserved for serious viral threats which C19 isn't. One can readily garner that by examining publicly available data. 3/
Read 12 tweets
4 May
Its hard to look at main stream news today and consider it a valuable public service. Cheapened by the sound bite and "gotcha" journalism, its notable for its general intellectual laziness. Its been in slow decline and many outlets deserve to die. But other formats rise. 1/
As one looks across this landscape, two general formats are emerging and starting to thrive. The first is true long format journalism, focused on unique (rather than popular) thought leaders. "Unherd", a YouTube production out of England is a good example. 2/
Perspective is fresh and unrehearsed, and their is a freedom of thought, that comes to the forefront, when interview length is unconstrained. An emerging Canadian equivalent is Trish Woods @WoodReporting, well worth a listen. 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(