FWIW this is the sort of move which hasn't happened in quite some time:
- big moves have basically all been driven by liquidations lately
- ESPECIALLY "low-liquidity" ones such as on weekends
So I think looking to data for the answer about what to expect as the weekend wraps up and liquidity increases is misguided -- intuition is likely gonna beat it.

What does intuition say?
Let's think about the features which distinguish this move / set of market conditions from other ones.

First: low liquidity and low volume.
The fact that there's low liquidity means that the amount of net buying or selling pressure to move the market is lower than usual -- in this case, we've needed less net selling than usual to move the market down.
And the fact that there's low volume means that it's *possible* that the transactions which have actually occurred during this weekend have very little to do with the market's average opinion!
If you imagine that, on Monday, 3x as much volume will trade as did during this little crash, it's clear that there's a TON of room for that volume / those MIA market players to have a really different opinion than "this is rich here, let's sell."
It's impossible to say a priori how different -- they might even wanna sell even lower! -- but I think it's pretty predictable that it has more propensity to be unrepresentative than if there were 3x as much volume this weekend.
So, I think low liquidity/volume combine to mean: this dip is not really what "the market" thinks is right, and is really just what a smallish fraction thinks is right. The broader market might wanna sell more or buy it back, who knows! All I specifically expect is elevated vol.
Another big difference: low liquidations.

Note: back when BTC was kinda bouncing around between 3k and 15k for a while in 2019 or something, this was closer to how most moves looked. Liquidations mattered, just more rarely.
It's predictable that we're in a low-liquidation zone of sorts. Tons of liquidations happened the other day from 40k -> 30k, and you'd basically think that anything that will get liquidated around here already did. OI stabilizing supports this!
Over time more new contracts will get opened, but this *just happened* -- it would be hard for a ton of liquidations to happen from a second drop to near 30k. This means that, unless things REALLY nosedive, we won't see these cascades for a bit.
This inherently removes a LOT of the momentum the market has been exhibiting -- there won't be a lot of forced selling on the way down or forced buying on the way up until we get out of this zone, or until time passes and OI goes up again.
So! I think this means the magnitude of moves we see -- especially as liquidity picks up and it takes more net buying/selling to move the market again -- should be *smaller* than we're used to, since the giant moves largely happen off the back of liquidations.
So, in combination, I think there's a strong chance for markets to move once the rest of the liquidity comes back (no strong opinion about direction), but the fact that we're not in a liquidation zone means that I'd expect the magnitude of the move to be smaller than recent ones.
... which is sorta a vague and not especially groundbreaking prediction, but that's what happens when all I get to rely on is intuition.

Looking forward to seeing how it plays out!
Oh oops I meant to post this as a RT of this, IDK what happened.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sam Trabucco

Sam Trabucco Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlamedaTrabucco

23 May
BTW not to be a downer but the stablecoin supply being up is less obviously +++ than a lot of people have claimed.

There are plenty of reasons why it could be good -- more USD flowing into the ecosystem could of course be used for buying crypto ...

... but, it could also be used to be parked in a yield farm, or as collateral for someone trying to get super short, or whatever.

Also, consider a common trade -- USDT gets really rich, MMs (such as Alameda) create USDT to sell it >1. This increases stablecoin supply!
Why does USDT (or any stablecoin) get rich? Various reasons -- maybe people really need something USD-like and so bid it up (because they're not creating for whatever reason). But maybe the BTC/USDT market has significant activity.
Read 6 tweets
20 May
Well. Crypto's crashed quite a bit in the past few days, leading up to a GIANT crash (BTC touched sub-$30k!) a few hours ago. It's ticked back up somewhat since, and started bouncing around a bit. What happened?

A thread about lemons and lemonade.
The narrative in the winter was clear: institutions were getting into crypto and that's why crypto rallied so much. This mostly happened in BTC, but the other coins mostly had a beta to BTC so they all rallied some, too.

Simple enough.
More recently, the rumors turned to ETH. Now, institutions were getting into ETH, too! And some other coins, but at least for the past couple weeks, the ETH rally was The Big Thing happening (ignoring DOGE). Look at that ETH/BTC over-performance! BTC dominance was at a local min.
Read 23 tweets
11 May
I throw the term "expected value" (EV for short) around a lot. What is it, and, more important, why is it the thing that matters?

A thread about the median and the mean.
Let's step back from trading and focus on an idealized situation which is sorta like trading. Say you've got $10 and all you're allowed to do with it is pay $10 to flip a coin which comes up heads 55% of the time, and you win $20 when it does. You can play as much as you want.
The *expected value* (EV) of each flip is

-$10 (cost of playing) + $.55 * 20 = $1

Meaning that each time you play, you're expected to make $1. Pretty good!
Read 25 tweets
28 Apr
I often talk here about decisions I/Alameda made that went well. Sometimes people ask for examples of the opposite -- times when I made a mistake and lost a lot, or even times I lost a lot by doing the right thing. Both happen a lot!

A thread about melted wings.
Alameda uses "March 12" in a Voldemort-like way -- it invokes dread like not much else, and it comes up a lot in mean vs. median discussions ("sure this usually works but it loses $5m on March 12," etc.)

Before March 12, though, there was another Terrible Day: September 25.
September 25, 2019 was -- at the time -- the scariest day I'd ever had trading, and I think it was maybe Alameda's worst potential vs. realized PNL day ever (we *could* have made a TON -- we, uh, didn't).
Read 21 tweets
22 Apr
2 years ago, Alameda maintained pretty strict delta neutrality most of the time, generally trying quite hard to make sure our PNL was from spreads and arbs. Today, not so much -- we got ... uh, really long in winter 2020, for instance. What changed?

A thread about super powers.
Let's back up a little: why does Alameda trade crypto? Why don't we do something else, like equities options trading? Or sports betting? Or competitive Scrabble?

(Incidentally, these are all things various team members have done or still do :P)
The basic answer: it's where the money is. We could make a bunch of sports betting models -- likely some of the world's best! -- but the money in crypto just makes it better. And sadly (for me), the money in competitive Scrabble is nothing to write home about.
Read 27 tweets
18 Apr
Haven't done one of these in a while: what happened in the crypto markets today?

A thread about the past and the future.
For the past week or so, crypto has been on a tear. It's risen slowly but steadily from the mid-$50s to new highs over $65k, seemingly without a ton of fanfare. Amidst excitement over the COIN direct listing, parts of this seemed almost inevitable.
The COIN listing came and went. And it's hard to say that it was anything but a pretty big disappointment vs. the market's hopes (and, certainly, amidst the market's hype-driven rally).

Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(