Haven't done one of these in a while: what happened in the crypto markets today?
A thread about the past and the future.
For the past week or so, crypto has been on a tear. It's risen slowly but steadily from the mid-$50s to new highs over $65k, seemingly without a ton of fanfare. Amidst excitement over the COIN direct listing, parts of this seemed almost inevitable.
The COIN listing came and went. And it's hard to say that it was anything but a pretty big disappointment vs. the market's hopes (and, certainly, amidst the market's hype-driven rally).
And, as I noted in that thread, crypto started crashing. But it didn't reverse all its gains! Might this signal that a lot of the rally was "organic" or whatever, and wasn't going to revert?
Maybe! But if you were paying attention, there were clues to the contrary.
All throughout this big rally, there were a few weird things going on. Almost all the inflows were happening on futures platforms, and in particular on futures platforms with HUGE leverage, and where that huge leverage has historically led to big liquidiations ...
... sorta like the ones that happened on Thanksgiving 2020 ;)
Futures premia have been REALLY high -- I'm sure everyone's heard how high the funding has gotten for various perpetuals products, and that signifies a TON of super aggressive buying going on -- Alameda has basically just been selling perps vs. buying spot for HUGE size lately.
And the same is true for quarterlies, and really just the whole market. Here's a graph of a bunch of BTC futures premia to spot over the last few weeks (annualized) -- heading into COIN things got *really* aggressive across the board! But it's been elevated for a while
Moreover, open interest for a ton of contracts was REALLY going up -- for BTC, but, in some cases, even moreso for various altcoins. Here's a random few hour period of the OI of XRP perps on binance -- most periods lately where we pulled this looked similar :P
So, futures have been at -- vs. the recent past -- unprecedentedly high premia, and OIs are skyrocketing. What does this set up?
If things keep going up and up and up? Well, nothing. A bunch of aggro buyers who it turned out were right.
But what about if there's a reason for a small downturn? A reason like, IDK, a super-hyped listing causing a rally and then falling short of the hype?
I've seen a lot of complex theories for why crypto *started* crashing, but I don't think you really need 'em. BTC rallied from 60k -> 65k in the days pre-COIN, fell to 62k quickly, and then ... well, fell to 60k over the next weekend. Kinda no biggie and exactly what I'd expect?
And so crypto falling a bit makes sense. What does that mean for all the super aggro levered longs?
The same thing it always means -- they're getting liquidated. Many billions of $ did today!
And, as we've said, it wasn't just perps where the big buyers were -- it was everywhere. In per day basis, most futures were close to each other, but that means quarterlies are at way higher premia -- and fall a TON more when the market crashes.
I talked on Thanksgiving about how low liquidity exacerbated the impact of the liquidations -- the same is true (though less so, on average) on weekends. With the quantity of liquidations we saw (HUGE, but explained by the OI increases) and weekend liquidity ...
... a fall to $50k is pretty much exactly what I'd expect. Futures ended up at GIANT discounts, in some cases (see Larry's thread above, e.g.) in part also because of low liquidity -- fewer big players with big bankrolls to swoop in and close the gaps.
(Again, I've seen some complex theories about this, but many billions of $ got liquidated on a weekend after a price move -- there were not many bids relative to that, and a 15% crash + a lot more for some less liquid products is just about right.)
Alameda was there, though! We bought a TON of 'em, and even slowed down at various points to maximize our prices. The limiting factor was our capacity to hedge, and lemme tell you, our capacity to hedge (by selling spot) started out GIANT!
We then prioritized freeing capital from margin and whatnot to sell more and kept doing the trade, but this is the sort of reason why these things don't just evaporate immediately -- crypto margin is REALLY inefficient compared to tradfi margin with prime brokers.
So! Over time (around an hour, a.k.a. the BTC block speed), the spreads started closing more, and the market rallied back somewhat -- again, just what we expect post-giant liquidations. Since NO ONE wanted to sell anything that cheap, of course they'll buy back.
Note, BTW, altcoins had similar movement but with (mostly) >1 beta, again as usual. XRP, for instance, fell a LOT today, because its OI increases were WAY higher vs. (weekend :P) liquidity than e.g. BTC's. That means it has way stronger momentum-y moves, as we keep seeing.
So, what next? Basically depends on whether the pre-COIN rally is "real" -- if so, the people who got liquidated (and others) *should* buy more s.t. the markets keep recovering. If not, who knows!
It's super valuable to learn from past events in crypto. It's all so idiosyncratic, that when we as traders are blessed with a big opportunity which is similar to one we've seen before, we have a BIG advantage over the market. And this was basically just Thanksgiving again!
Next time premia and OIs are way up and there's some organic reversion? Alameda will know what to do, and now so will you!
Oh I definitely linked to the wrong thread here LOL, I meant to this:
The crypto market is reacting broadly basically how I thought -- the world is all watching this, the world all expects BTC to be correlated to COIN right now (since Coinbase's success is seen as something of a proxy for success of BTC in the US), so crypto is crashing.
And the worst performers of all? The likes of BNB and other exchange tokens, who are seen as *especially* correlated with COIN and Coinbase more generally. When the indics first started crashing, BNB *really* underperformed -- it's recovered some but not totally vs. BTC.
Heading into Coinbase's hotly anticipated listing, markets have been volatile, and there's been a lot of great trading to do if you know where to look.
Honestly, the trading has seemed almost ... *too* great? And pretty easy to predict.
Let me first discuss this notion more generally -- efficiency. A market is called *efficient* if prices in the market consistently reflect some true fair value, based on all possible data at the time -- trade history, blockchain data, news, etc.
How efficient are crypto markets?
This shouldn't be a *giant* surprise, but the answer is: not really :P
A priori this might not be totally clear, but we've seen time and again the markets just not move in the obvious direction for what seems like an eternity:
March 12, 2020 was the hardest* day** of my life. A year later, it sticks out more clearly as the most interesting situation I've ever been faced with -- and one from which I've learned a ton. Here are a few lessons I learned directly from March 12:
*tied with the time in 9th grade when I was forced to play on a baseball team and managed to strike out vs. a pitcher who walked everyone else and would have walked me 4-0 if I had not swung once
**really the 3ish days around then, but it felt like a month so IDK
ADAPT
Pre-COVID, crypto was its own thing. Mostly divorced from the traditional markets, BTC (for instance) really did not have a beta to SPY, for instance -- it was totally its own thing.
The most popular narrative surrounding the crypto rally for the past few months has been clear and consistent: U.S. institutional buying is fueling everything. And I agree that this narrative has basically been right!
But ... I also think there's nuance here which can be lost.
It's easy to make the leap from "U.S. institutions fueling the rally" to "U.S. is buying crypto and fueling the rally." And THEN it's easy to make the leap to "when crypto sells off, Asia is selling." I see people make these leaps all the time!
And sometimes I think claims like this are at least defensible. Like, sure, part of the narrative is that Grayscale has a lot of creations, probably that means U.S. "is buying" to some extent. And when BTC does (sometimes) go up during U.S. hours and down later, sure.
Ah, election trading. I think trading the election in November was some of the most fun I've ever had in my life ... for the first day. Maaaybe the second.
But, always a silver lining: people were bidding TRUMPFEB high. WAY higher than we ever thought was reasonable -- we couldn't find a single informed source who honestly believed the probability of Trump remaining in office was higher than 1% or so. And LOOK at this chart!
We quickly decided we believed our fair way more than the market and that there were no real selection effects here -- it all became a question of maximizing the amount of $ we could make from selling into the bids.
As I've been saying a lot lately on Twitter, Alameda is quite comfortable with the Tether team, and we do a lot of large creations! I talked about that in more length in this thread:
What does "large" mean, though? Well, it depends! And it doesn't just depends on any absolute metrics, or on market conditions, or whatever -- it also depends on our own ability to think through the question of "how much should we create" and "how much is like, too much, c'mon."
Soon after we got set up to do creations, we did some initial studies to determine how much we could sell above $1 + X + Y + Z, where X was creation cost, Y was "execution cost," and Z was "cost of tying up capital." We also charge for our time and add some edge somewhere.