The following might seem counter-intuitive given the understandable relief most Biden supporters feel[myself included] after he defeated Trump and did such an excellent job making vaccines available for all American adults. However, three critical post-election actions by the
2] Republican Party and its most rabid followers suggest that the risk of losing our democracy is even greater now than before Biden's victory. First, the violent premeditated insurrection was designed to postpone the electoral count in Congress so Trump could declare martial law
3] Put simply, it was the first step of a violent coup to keep Trump in office. So far, our Justice Department has not been able to hold the king-makers behind this plot to defeat the will of the electorate accountable. The second critical series of actions involved the passage
4]]of blatant voter suppression legislation designed to disenfranchise minority voters by barring voting by mail and other measures prolonging the time frame for voting. All of these voter suppression strategies were enacted by Republican controlled state legislatures. The third
5]]critical event is the attempt of most congressional Republicans to prevent the enactment of a commission whose sole task would be to identify those individuals who had triggered the violent insurrection not only by their words promoting the big lie but by their actions to
6]organize and mobilize the different militant groups of foot soldiers who falsely but sincerely believed that the election had been "stolen". If the leaders of the attempted violent coup are never held accountable and the voter suppression legislation is not invalidated, why
7]should these anti-democratic forces abstain from any future actions to undermine our democracy?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Arenella

Peter Arenella Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @arenella1

18 Aug 20
1]My colleague and good friend Kim Crenshaw has written an important essay in the New Republic that I am hoping you will share with your followers. Here is her conclusion: "These facts point us toward a troubling but essential fact: that the behavior of police inthe United States
2]has hardly been about law enforcement; its instead been about the protection of a very particular status quo. And that status quo is tied directly to the maintenance of the inferior status of Black people. It is a calculated legal institutionalization of white dominance that's
3]been kept in place for all of American history" I witnessed this oppression as a young Public Defender when I defended my minority clients in court and interviewed them in our jails and prisons. I then taught criminal law courses for almost 30 years in some of this nation's
Read 6 tweets
16 Jul 20
My only son, now 35, was born with brain damage as he was an undiagnosed breach baby[ex insisted on a midwife who was "anti technology"] who suffered severe anoxia at birth causing mild retardation. By the time he was 11, he was diagnosed with severe bi polar manic depression. I
2] offer these facts o explain why a criminal law professor, would be motivated to develop an expertise in child development theory. I spent years reading the relevant literature as well as consulting with some terrific child psychiatrists and clinical psychologists at UCLA.
3] As a result of my new expertise, I started to research and write about sociopathy and moral psychopaths. This background helped me realize why Trump had no difficulty lying constantly and suffered no cognitive dissonance when he would say X on one day, and the opposite of X
Read 7 tweets
9 May 20
List of things Americans should be sad/angry about:

1] we are the richest nation in the world in terms of material resources/wealth yet one of five children in the US go bed hungry every night because they don't have enough food to eat.
2] We have lost over 70,000 human beings with the numbers of dead growing exponentially every day yet many of us feel angry about the necessity of social distancing and the consequent incursions on our freedom of movement; equating it with a loss of liberty that is not comparable
to the caging of children who had the bad luck to be born to poor parents fleeing their homeland for a better life. Ironically, many legal immigrants to our country are willing to ignore the plight of these children because they lack empathy for anyone outside their own family.
Read 7 tweets
18 Apr 20
Are there evil people or only evil acts? If the former category exists, what defines an evil person if one rejects a religious conception? The most evil people I have met in this life are those individuals born with significant mental ability [e.g. genetic moral luck] in
2] supportive families[environmental moral luck] who are hard wired to ignore social/moral norms unless compliance with them is in their self interest. They know what they are and are indifferent to the damage they cause others as they pursue their particular goals. These people
3] lack a basic attribute of humanity; the capacity for empathy. While psychiatry shuns conceptions of good and evil, it has a diagnostic category that covers this type of person: moral psychopaths who "suffer" from anti-social personality disorder. I put suffer in quotes because
Read 6 tweets
24 Sep 18
REBUTING THE SILLY PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE/PRESUMPTION OF GUILT ARGUMENTS THAT KAVANAUGH SUPPORTERS ARE MAKING 1] the presumption of innocence only applies to criminal prosecutions where the govt must prove the defendants guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This burden of proof is
2]designed to create an error preference:far better to acquit the guilty than to convict the innocent. In most legal proceedings, the burden of proof is merely a preponderance of evidence eg more likely than not. Even this type of burden of proof has no applicability to a senate
3]inquiry designed to determine whether the nominee to a life time tenure job on the Supreme Court because the nominee has no right or entitlement to be a Supreme Court justice. Nor is there some presumption of guilt simply because someone has claimed the nominee has committed a
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(