His line that "Dharma is higher than Gods"
Gods were respected because they followed Dharma?
Okay then your God is bound by some pre existing morality he is not omnipotent and he is not the always existing then?
In bhagvadgita 18/66 सर्वान धर्मान परित्यज्य।all the rituals etc
Again Just to surge the life in rayta wing many people came with stupid logic "Padma puran mentions Shiva as Giving boon to him"
Okay so?,There is Kalpa-Bheda. From this we can't reject that Brahma gace boon
In vishnu purana too "ब्रह्मणो वरदर्पितः" is used.
and then look at the things like "Krishna gives all the boons" (BG 7/22) so brahma never gives boon to anyone is true🤡
By considering this Rudra too doesn't gives boon as he's कार्यब्रह्म if Krishna is कारण.
The vyavhar will still be done as Brahma/indra/rudra gave the boon
Raytas may try Hard to protect the clowns who give statements like "Sadhguru is my Dharma" "I want to destroy everything including Hinduism". We know these rats are people worshippers not the worshippers of God or Dharma.
This is from Mahabharta sabha parva.
We've shown you the references from Vishnu p/Bhagvataam/Mahabharat.
Padma puran incident can be taken as Kalpa Bheda. Saying "Brahma never gives boons" is utmost stupidity and trying hard to reduce the damage is even bigger
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🌺+A thread about the interpolation propaganda used by avedic sects and peak escapists+🌺
Continue with me till the end,It is going to be a long thread...
Average RW Hindu will not study under an acharya he'll rather make unnecessary noise. The texts will be called out of date or adulterated.
Those who proclaim the adulteration in scriptures will be called as gurus and Scriptural+hard working people will be called names.
This is the reason why Hindu society is falling and this is why Hindu society will fall further. When things are not understood, they declare them as adulterated
🌺Ask these to people who cry about interpolation in texts when it doesn't match their ideology:-
AvtāraVadā a thread
People who hadn't learned to chant even a Sukta properly in 150 years,People who due to fear hadn't accepted the whole 1131 samhitas+brahmanas as Vedas often raise questions about Avataravad. Let's see their childlike claims in short:-
The first thing you need to know is that Vedas have the mention of all three types of Ishvara. सगुण - साकार, सगुण -
निराकार,निर्गुण - निराकार।।Mention of one type doesn't Cancels other.
Claim 1:-Yajurveda 40/8 calls him अकायम्, अव्रण means without body,Veins and Pores
Here in this mantra Ishvara is called अकाय without body and then he is called without pores(अव्रण) without veins( अस्नाविर) Is it पुनरुक्ति दोष because By "without body" all these can be expressed.