Also, while body cams captured this encounter, they did not and so not prevent things like this from happening, which seems to be what a lot of people hope they will do.
All this over an “unspecified traffic violation.” Not even a “crime.”
It’s telling that the reform-minded police voices in the story take issue with how Greene was treated after the police had him on the ground — but they don’t take issue with the fact of the encounter itself.
This is a huge philosophical difference between “reform” and more radically reimagining public safety: reform often leads to policy solutions that alter the procedures of policing but not the premises of it. (Like wearing the aforementioned body cameras.)
Hire more brown cops, Have more “community policing,” mandate body cameras, equip cops with “less lethal” weapons, give them better training, etc
Are you safer if a cop carries out a bullshit traffic stop during which you are tased while their body cam rolls? Is anyone?
Why is any of that contact with the police necessary?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
10 minutes into the @yourewrongabout episode on politics correctness and it already feels like a look at the intellectual history that led to that moral panic-y NYT story about Smith College a few months ago.
One thing that’s important context for fights over “culture” and “free speech” on campuses is that they are primary sites of conflict re: historical and ongoing segregation.
1) These are PWIs established *for* white students and white academics that are still reckoning with the reality that “integration” is more complicated than simply beginning to admit people who ain’t white. (Or straight or able-bodied or...)
Look, i hate the tourist-ification of this word, too. But we were saying this long before all these suburbanites decided they wanted to get their reverse-white flight on and putting it on t-shirts and ugh
Oh, a Penn Law professor from Montgomery County doesn’t like a piece of appropriated Black Philly slang?