fresh RCT on the effects of a continuous infusion of hypertonic saline for traumatic brain injury (#1/6) jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
patients were randomized to an infusion of 20% NaCl for 48 hours. as shown here, the infusion was successful at pushing sodium levels to the mid-150s, with nice separation between groups (#2/6)
initially, patients receiving hypertonic infusions had fewer episodes of ICP elevation. however, their brain cells adapted rapidly to the higher tonicity... so when the hypertonic was stopped they had *rebound* elevation of ICP (#3/6)
ultimately patients treated w/ hypertonic infusions needed *more* rescue therapies for ICP:
😬 trend towards more boluses of hypertonic therapy
😬 significantly greater use of hyperventilation
so routine induction of abnormal physiology probably caused more harm than good
there was no difference in the primary endpoint (functional outcome after six months). not surprising, given the number of factors affecting this endpoint. and also, the fact that ICP was monitored and *corrected* when things were really going sideways. (#5/6)
the negative results of this study were predicted & explained further in this blog from 2014. bottom line:
🤯 giving everybody hypertonic infusions like Oprah isn't good
🤯better to use boluses when truly needed, as a temporary bridge to another treatment emcrit.org/pulmcrit/hyper…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
if you don't immediately know why this paper is garbage, then read this explanation (bit.ly/3klwkek). in short, time-to-intervention studies are retrospective correlational junk which continue to infest the scientific literature (rantorial #1/4)
the data from this study actually suggest that early antibiotics in pneumonia are *bad*, but early antibiotics in septic shock are *good*. this obviously isn't true -it merely serves as an illustration of what happens when you conflate correlation with causality (rantorial #2/4)
the study is funded and largely performed by Shionogi (a company producing - you guessed it - antibiotics!). this may explain their unbridled enthusiasm with the conclusion that early antibiotics will save the world (rantorial #3/4)
three short chapters on gastrointestinal hypo-motility in critical care.
💣this topic often gets *ignored* until there's a serious complication
💣early attention to motility can avoid iatrogenesis & facilitate recovery...
(thread #1/4)
ICU gastroparesis
🤮 manifests as tube feed intolerance (but don't assume that feeding intolerance = gastroparesis!)
🤮 a post-pyloric feeding tube can treat this nicely. otherwise erythromycin +/- metoclopramide
🤮 treat this- don't just watch/wait (#2/4) emcrit.org/ibcc/gastropar…
ICU ileus
🤮prevention is key- avoid opioids, early enteral nutrition, early mobility🏃
🤮NG drainage *only* if needed for symptomatic relief
🤮prokinetic meds don't work, but *oral* naloxone might help among patients on significant opioid doses (#3/4) emcrit.org/ibcc/ileus/
a fresh review article on pancreatitis in the Lancet is some hot garbage. as Eduardo rightly pointed out 👇, the bit on fluid resuscitation is nuts. but there are more errors, which merit a short #rantorial... 1/4
one RCT showed that delayed feeding was OK... in a population with mostly *mild* illness. the authors wrongly extrapolate this to *all* patients. esp for an intubated patient, there is no reason to delay feeding for 72 hours! #rantorial 2/4 emcrit.org/ibcc/pancreati…
regarding analgesia, the authors suggest that opioids could be used to avoid non-opioids! 🤬🤬 this is backwards. the goal is generally to use non-opioids to reduce the opioid dose, and thereby *avoid* opioid-induced side effects (especially illeus). #3/4 emcrit.org/ibcc/pain/
Tobin vs Gattinoni: Infinity War💣
Get some more popcorn 🍿
Let's start back at the beginning...
🥊Round #1: Tobin's original editorial casts shade on P-SILI & recommends our usual, conservative approach to intubation (rather than pre-emptive intubation) bit.ly/3h7wx3r
Round #2: Gattinoni replies
🥊3 citations to support existence of P-SILI
🥊claims COVID patients have unusually good compliance based on observing hundreds of patients (no data)
🥊recommends using esophageal pressure swings as a trigger for intubation 🤡 bit.ly/3aAHGaA
Round #3: Tobin strikes back
🥊Major flaws noted in three citations supporting the existence of P-SILI (still hasn't been clearly demonstrated, even in animal models 🐑)
🥊Lack of evidentiary support for esophageal pressure thresholds bit.ly/3aEmUXB
👊Martin Tobin strikes again, with a painfully incisive editorial on whether COVID-19 is ARDS. this discussion is worth having, to debunk some mis-conceptions surrounding the concept of ARDS...(1/6).
(full article: bit.ly/39NzbZB)
ARDS isn't a disease, it's a *syndrome* (an empiric grouping of abnormalities with no defined etiology). the utility of this syndrome has long been debatable. ARDS has evolved through a series of consensus definitions, which nonetheless remain profoundly flawed. (2/6)
and what if we diagnose our patient with ARDS? this has no clinical implications (other than avoiding insanely large tidal volumes). in particular, don't assume that an "ARDS" diagnosis means that the patient must be treated in some cook-book, tightly protocoled fashion (3/6)