Students may be back inside school buildings, but there's lots more work to do: view our testimony to the @MASchoolsK12 Board of Elementary of Secondary Education today to hear re: the concerning experience inside those school buildings:
Thread🧵(1/)
All along, we had said our first goal was to get children back in buildings; then, we would focus on “picking up the pieces” of what’s going on inside of buildings. Sadly, there is quite a bit to “pick up”...
Here are examples from districts across the state:
(2/)
Children’s’ school libraries still closed, books that must quarantine upon return, and children unable to perform upper‐level science labs because they aren’t allowed to touch the lab materials. (3/)
Children eating lunch on towels or buckets on the floor, being told not to speak; some districts showing movies during lunch to deter children from speaking, others purposely separating friends so they’ll be less tempted to talk. (4/)
Children unable to drink water at their desks since
they’re only 3 feet apart; sometimes parents of children with chronic medical issues have had to file 504 simply so their child has permission to drink water at their desk. (5/)
Children with no recess happening at all. Students being told they cannot stand up to help a friend at another desk - if they want to collaborate, they should open a zoom breakout room to do so. (6/)
Students required to clean their own desks with warm, soapy water between classes in middle school – doing this upwards of 6‐7x per day; districts where mask breaks cannot happen on inclement weather days and some districts where children do not get any mask breaks at all. (7/)
And finally, children being restricted from accessing education all together because some districts still require a full class to quarantine because of a positive case (despite masking, distancing, or updated DESE close contact guidelines) (8/)
So what can we do to rectify this?
First, the entire framing & tone from @MassEducation & @MassGovernor around children, COVID, & schools must change to reflect relative risk *and* acknowledge that every protocol implemented comes with a trade‐off to children’s education. (9/)
Second, we need to strongly consider what the purview of @masseducation local control is with respect to public health matters. Why are matters of public health & pandemic protocols, as it relates to a State of Emergency, in the purview of local district control? (10/)
And finally, we must manage now what happens with existing and future guidance from @MASchoolsK12 - they need to simplify the language, focus on the evidence, & allow families to play a role in choosing how to manage their child’s risk. (11/)
What may count as “access” to in‐person learning, does not necessarily constitute a proper school experience, particularly in light of updated knowledge on the virus, a highly effective vaccine for adults, & a deeper understanding of how this year has impacted children (/end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Parents are getting used to the shaming from elected leaders: Kudos to these Lexington parents for speaking up when *elected* School Comm member @kathleenlenihan publicly mocks them.
This is why we applaud 👏 @MASchoolsK12 disrupting local control
This, folks, is what us parents are getting used to dealing with from @MASCSchoolComm elected leaders ‼️
Simply because we are vocalizing that our children need to be prioritized and that any semblance of routine and in-person schooling is sorely needed. Shameful! #openschools
Bargain for labor all you want but @massteacher PLEASE for the love of all things STOP telling us that you’re doing this for the students. You must not have heard the very concerning calls from doctors to re-open schools for these STUDENTS who so badly need it. (1/n)
In case you missed it @massteacher, some quotes from the folks who really are standing up for students ⬇️
At @MASchoolsK12 mtg: Commissioner @JeffreyCRiley discusses a provisionally accepted study by interdisciplinary group of doctors in a top infectious disease journal: "The effectiveness of 3- vs. 6-feet of distancing for controlling the spread of covid-19 among students and staff"
The study compared 194 MA districts operating at 6 feet with 49 MA districts at 3-feet from Sept to January, with all other mitigation in place, concludes: "there was not a higher case rate of COVID-19 in either students OR staff based on the difference in spacing." #openschools