1. The 1st of SIX Benghazi Committees was convened in the House in May of 2014-nearly TWO YRs after the event which occurred 9/11 of 2012.

It wasn't convened to find truth bc that was already known. It was convened to target the D Party's likely 2016 p nominee @HillaryClinton
2. However, in pursuit of the "norm of objectivity" & there never-ending effort to dispel the Right's narrative of media bias, the media covered each of these 6 committees as legit "fact-finding" missions, even after McCarthy publicly admitted its purpose (to political damage
3. Clinton) in 2015. As I demonstrated in my book on the 2016 election, they were facing the probability of running against a VERY popular former S of S. Even 2 years out from Benghazi, Clinton polled well.

Something had to be done!
4. No, even knowing what the GOP was up to, the Ds weren't willing to appear partisan (god forbid) so they rolled out the red carpet for the House minority. Clinton was compelled to submit herself to a 10+hr testimony despite her obvious candidacy for the D nom.

Now, imagine if
5. the Ds had refused to cooperate? Or had withdrawn their cooperation after McCarthy publicly admitted what they were doing? Imagine if @HillaryClinton had refused to show up given that it would impact the 2016 election.

The coverage would have been MERCILESS

Every motive
6. questioned. The media would have stopped at nothing to find out why @HillaryClinton wouldn't show up and the House would subpoena her and call for her to be prosecuted if she didn't show.

If you are a member of nat press corp & not giving the GOP's blocking of the Jan 6th
7. Commission this same level of scrutiny & intensity- ask yourself why? We know Trump & his pardoned posse were in contact w the Proud Boys. We know that certain members of the R Caucus have ties to these groups too.

Yet total complacency in coverage???
Don't you want to KNOW
8. if current, sitting members of Congress had a hand on this domestic terror event? Don't you want to know if the R's intended 2024 nominee helped plot it?

Its your damn DUTY to find out.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel Bitecofer 📈🔭🍌

Rachel Bitecofer 📈🔭🍌 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RachelBitecofer

25 May
I have to say that I like @davidshor & we are friendly bc we agree on a lot, ESP that you don't win via policy extremism.

But the idea Ds don't already do ⬇️ AND lose winnable races is just WRONG.

It isn't innovation- it's status quo.

And it's nowhere close to enough
The Cult of Rachel

If you ain't winning, you're losing.
I'll add that "talking about popular stuff" won't help you if you don't put it into a threat/stakes context. That is "me" not "we" framed. And don't make the case that the GOP is the thing keeping the voter from having it.
Read 4 tweets
18 May
1. Its not an accident that its the MS law. BC believe it or not, ELECTIVE abortion after 15 wks polls terribly

BUT upholding that here (which requires overturning CASEY) would then set them up for the overturning Roe in one of the 6wk bans like GA's.

Later, as in after '22
2. That said, its a mistake for Ds to hyper-focus on this issue and their own efforts need to include a sustained campaign to make people FEAR losing abortion access. Yes, access (*w some regulations) polls good, but the Right's "Abortion on Demand" branding campaign has been
3. VERY effective in whittling away support for elective abortions, and their machine is perfectly geared to wage that messaging war against the Left's own, wonky, policy-oriented messaging techniques. The GOP will go pure emotion- you must too to combat it.
Read 4 tweets
2 May
1. Just as the 2022 Midterms will begin Nov. 3rd, in the dust of VA's 2021 cycle & the GOP's shameless, tax-payer subsidized witch hunt of @GavinNewsom.

As I tell @StrikePac donor's- the narrative for the cycle gets set then & there.

Hold VA's trifecta & demolish the recall
2. & the media narrative will be that mb, just MB, Ds can beat the "midterm effect" in '22. But, lose a ton of seats in VA's House or the majority, &/or barely eek out a recall defeat- the narrative favors the GOP.

Why does this matter, you ask? As I told @harrisonjaime
3. win '21 & Ds can recruit quality cand's to challenge Rs for the House seats they backdoored in 2020 & force the Rs to spend on defense. Those "lost" districts are all what I call my "2nd tier" districts in my model: educated but not as robustly as other
Read 28 tweets
26 Apr
Bc of all the shithole states, WVA is the shittiest
The data don't lie
Surprised no one got my Trump joke here though
Read 4 tweets
23 Apr
IF the recall against @GavinNewsom is a go, celeb & name ID matters- a lot.

This is why the GOP's worst henchmen recruited her

Newsome will NEED TO tie her to Trump/MAGA

If the GOP clears their field & another D splits the vote...

(Not an accident they recruited Jenner)
Y'all gotta remember, the GOP is ruthless. They will napalm him. Hard to hit 50% yes? ABSOLUTELY

Impossible? Not for the GOP
I should add, they'll try to get to that 50% by running ads against Newsome from the Left to get progressives to vote yes on the recall AND likely sneak logistic support to any progressive candidate.

The GOP does not f; around.
Read 4 tweets
14 Apr
1. Its a 50 yr pattern broken just twice, once under extraordinary conditions (2002, right after 9/11 where GOP benefitted from a rally around the flag effect that could STILL HAPPEN 1. bc mass polarization was just beginning & 2. D voters far less polarized) and then in 1998 in
2. what we (political scientists) attribute to a backlash about trying to impeach Clinton about lying about an affair. That's it though, in every other midterm, POTUS' party loses seats. Plus, right now we have a pattern of stronger midterm effects, which I believe is a product
3. of hyperpartisanship, party sorting, coalitional realignments for both parties, & changes in geographic strongholds for both parties.

That all said @jakehteach it IS possible we'd see a disruption in 2022 if D's carpe diem extremism & racism in the GOP & turn the referendum
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(