1. Just as the 2022 Midterms will begin Nov. 3rd, in the dust of VA's 2021 cycle & the GOP's shameless, tax-payer subsidized witch hunt of @GavinNewsom.

As I tell @StrikePac donor's- the narrative for the cycle gets set then & there.

Hold VA's trifecta & demolish the recall
2. & the media narrative will be that mb, just MB, Ds can beat the "midterm effect" in '22. But, lose a ton of seats in VA's House or the majority, &/or barely eek out a recall defeat- the narrative favors the GOP.

Why does this matter, you ask? As I told @harrisonjaime
3. win '21 & Ds can recruit quality cand's to challenge Rs for the House seats they backdoored in 2020 & force the Rs to spend on defense. Those "lost" districts are all what I call my "2nd tier" districts in my model: educated but not as robustly as other
4. districts. More imp than racial demos in frontline districts (though this, I should note, is due in part to D underperformance on the persuasion side of their Latino opps), in my modeling edu is the 2nd best predictor of vote share (increasing w edu for Ds, decreasing for Rs).
5.College voters are realigning to the Left & that is IMP for a Midterm, esp THIS ONE. Edu matters even in a model w a POWERFUL party effect. So, over-investment in dealigning districts, subpar messaging strategy-not focusing down ballot races as referendum on Rs
COVID & obstruction of COVID Relief 2- which the GOP obstructed for 8ths (got 0 heat for it) AND, VIP: failing to use @staceyabrams' coalitional turnout (really double-downing-NOT, some 1/2 ass effort to text low propensity voters (though I suppose ANY focus on LPV is progress)
6. many competitive campaigns not running in-person field, perhaps the single greatest strategic blunder in modern history of American electioneering (but it was the RIGHT THING TO DO!) And YES I made all of these critiques in real time. Go find them for me, will you?! I digress
7. though. This thread is about why Ds HAVE to dominate the VA 21 cycle (here too BTW, under ideal fundamentals most of ⬆️mistakes were also made. The "tier 2" races, all sequestered in Hampton Roads & outside of RVA, were all clearly ID'd by my research, months in advance. I
8. argued they would hold the NOVA seat gains handily & that they needed to divert more resources to HR & RVA- or they would drop winnable races due to insufficient turnout relative to what the GOP would pull out of the coalition (who is treated to all of the above, every race
9. every cycle (as my friend @MichaelSteele will ✅!) The GOP lit it up: all FEAR & referendum. Turnout juicing. In the end, despite losing among Is overall, even among pure Is (yes, I have polling receipts for this) right-leaning Is and Rs outvoted Ds in tinyurl.com/2mknap3t
10. 3 senate seats perfectly situated to flip, and 3 or 4 delegate races. We could use that buffer now, esp for the state senate which Ds have to defend in the even worse fundamentals of '23 (no gov race that cycle). Now don't get me wrong, I ♥️ that the senate flipped,
11. which along with the HOD flipping (thank you courts!) gave VA Ds A GOVERNING TRIFECTA in the former capitol of the Confederacy, no less. And have they used it? Yes they have! Legal pot, serious CJ reform including abolition of the death
12. penalty, and my personal favorite, ACTUAL common sense gun reform. On things we at Wason Center repeatedly found polling in the high 80s (universal back ground checks & red flag laws). An aside, the ENTIRE VA GOP CAUCUS voted against the red flag law. AGAIN. Seriously! That's
13. how EXTREMIST the modern Rep Party is, even in VA! Nevertheless, since state gov't isn't saddled w stupid shit like the filibuster, a narrow D VA senate majority was all our legislators needed to make it a bit harder abusers to shoot their wives. whsv.com/content/news/V…
14. Indeed, not saddled by "tyranny of the minority" like fed Ds, our FAB @vademocrats have been on a TEAR- turning VA into a socialist hellhole that no would want to live in (except for, apparently, everyone!) Did I mention that VA residents age 21+ will be able to pass the
15. coochie to the left-hand side on July 1st. Gonna be a GREAT July 4th over here in the Commonwealth if anyone from the GOP's Fascist Confederacy wants a good, but cheap & close vacay to celebrate America's B-Day & the beginning of liberation of the American South. Now, I
16. mention of this bc likely, you don't give two shits about an off-year cycle in VA (& a distant bullshit recall way out in Cali) but I want everyone reading this to understand that while YOU may not care, why you might be "tired" and "need a break" the Terminator on the other
17. NEVER RESTS. BC the GOP fully appreciates the value of permanent infrastructure, they have built one, and will continue to grow it all summer. They are fresh off the success of their latest evil innovation- digitally targeting minority voters to convince them to not vote
18. for the party of "socialism" who wants to defund the police & let criminal hordes come rape and plunder your suburban neighborhoods. And guess what, like OTHER voters, their targets don't follow politics, don't care much about state level elections, and bc they don't have
19. solid base of knowledge about how the GOP is a hot mess that has destroyed the American economy & now has its sites on democracy itself, ads that come from Rs and are not offset by equally compelling ads by us, WILL work. Yes, studies show that conservative-minded minority
20. voters (esp on the issue of police) were more likely to defect to Trump in 2020- but this diagnosis omits to acknowledge how critical the mechanism of delivery of messaging is. Not only do down-ballot Rs have a bigger dig operation (once you remove fundraising dig- we're ACE
21. at hunting cash- they have a more sophisticated messaging op. Both in terms of WHO they target, where they target them, and most imp, the aggressive, D-brand destroying shit they target them with. Now don't fret, as I like to say, @StrikePac will fix that too & we're aligned
22. VA's top dig firm who already does great work, but who I am working with to develop a bad ass little dig strategy that will make Brad Parscale blush. And that's a guy who just recruited a trans-woman to run as the GOP's standard bearer while the GOP is literally passing law
23. after law abusing our trans friends. So yeah, Parscale isn't prone to blushing (he's shameless). You have to be when you're willing to work w Putin & intentionally suppress voting of voters of color. I assume the GOP will stop at NOTHING to sneak in a W in VA.
24.They rigged their gov primary to avoid nominating the MTG of VA. The GOP is out there, they cant be bargained w, cant be reasoned w, don't feel pity or remorse or fear, & it absolutely will not stop... EVER, until Ds are dead! Aside from their suicide-pact gerrymandering plan
25. the national GOP establishment is already ALL IN in VA. Hell, one dark $ pac has been attacking @ProjectLincoln for mths via direct mail.

So y'all, each & everyone of you, should start caring A LOT about the 2021 election cycle. Put on some big girl pants &
26. AND, if you want to sup the 🪖 we're amassing, ⬇️.

PS: I can't stress this enough, you CAN'T beat Rubio/FL unless you fracture the Miami-Dade Cuban voting block- which CAN BE DONE ONLY 1 WAY: w a D Cuban-American nominee that inspires YOUNG Cubans
strikepac.com
27. Finally, and since you came this far w me, NO, I can not structure my long threads so that each tweet is self-contained. Besides, W.I.T.H. would I want to enable you to RT just 1 part of this thread. RT the whole damn thing! Democracy is dying here!!

(yes, this is a JOKE)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel Bitecofer 📈🔭🍌

Rachel Bitecofer 📈🔭🍌 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RachelBitecofer

26 Apr
Bc of all the shithole states, WVA is the shittiest
The data don't lie
Surprised no one got my Trump joke here though
Read 4 tweets
23 Apr
IF the recall against @GavinNewsom is a go, celeb & name ID matters- a lot.

This is why the GOP's worst henchmen recruited her

Newsome will NEED TO tie her to Trump/MAGA

If the GOP clears their field & another D splits the vote...

(Not an accident they recruited Jenner)
Y'all gotta remember, the GOP is ruthless. They will napalm him. Hard to hit 50% yes? ABSOLUTELY

Impossible? Not for the GOP
I should add, they'll try to get to that 50% by running ads against Newsome from the Left to get progressives to vote yes on the recall AND likely sneak logistic support to any progressive candidate.

The GOP does not f; around.
Read 4 tweets
14 Apr
1. Its a 50 yr pattern broken just twice, once under extraordinary conditions (2002, right after 9/11 where GOP benefitted from a rally around the flag effect that could STILL HAPPEN 1. bc mass polarization was just beginning & 2. D voters far less polarized) and then in 1998 in
2. what we (political scientists) attribute to a backlash about trying to impeach Clinton about lying about an affair. That's it though, in every other midterm, POTUS' party loses seats. Plus, right now we have a pattern of stronger midterm effects, which I believe is a product
3. of hyperpartisanship, party sorting, coalitional realignments for both parties, & changes in geographic strongholds for both parties.

That all said @jakehteach it IS possible we'd see a disruption in 2022 if D's carpe diem extremism & racism in the GOP & turn the referendum
Read 6 tweets
14 Apr
1. I'm going to open a convo w @RadioFreeTom about this.

Yes, 40% didn't graduate & no owe tons of $ but likely still have bad job prospects & although some didn't grad bc tough circumstance/med issues, as a once prof I can tell you, that's NOT the majority. Most didn't bc
2. they didn't like doing, or prioritize enough, the college part of college & end up failing out.

Now here's the thing- just some context- your college record is permanent so if you fail out somewhere at 19 or 20 you can't "transfer" out that shitty GPA & its very hard to get
3. access to loans/aid again to go back when you're in your late 20s when you have a worth ethic & better understand living in poverty (as I did- though lucky, I didn't START until I was that age). So they're stuck w loans they can't pay AND they can't continue on to finish. BUT
Read 19 tweets
12 Apr
1. I ♥️ the findings of this study & I think their approach is cool (nat experiments > anything else) but I worry the entire analysis in built on selection bias bc it doesn't seem like they consider non-prosecution DISCRETION which may distort the entire pool they sample from.
2. By this I mean maybe prosecutors are just good at identifying likely "1 & doners? Better test would be to analyze all the data from someplace that has already stopped all prosecution of "low-level" misdemeanors the compare before & after data to see if 1. reoffenses decrease
3. overall from before & after AND be able to control for really imp factors like race, place/geographic location/income, gender, etc AND eliminate that potential front-end selection bias. In other words we can't be sure from this analysis bc of the "discretion" bias.
Read 4 tweets
9 Apr
I posted this once before & many of you took issue w the topic of the analysis, some w/o reading the article I'd add.

The economists who launched the OG study did so bc data suggested there was a relationship between child gender & divorce. They wanted to test that hypo &
2.found that indeed, divorce rates were higher for families w girls than boys.

The economists that REASSESSED this OG work, to verify it & better understand it, did verify relationship BUT added IMP nuance: effect is refined to 1st kid & soon- the effect disappears as kid ages.
3. And here's where it gets interesting: there's enough men out there who divorce their wives when she fails to produce a male "heir" on the 1st try STILL for there to be a statistically significant "divorce" effect if you have a girl instead of a boy on child 1.

YES- even NOW!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!