Unsurprisingly, the upcoming @WokenessG conference has at least one sponsor, The Baptist Missionary Association Theological Seminary, that has a disturbing record on issues of racism.
There’s a lot of overlap among evangelicals who dismiss social justice (or “wokeness”) as Marxist, those who embrace patriarchy, and those whose theology borrows heavily from the thinking of men who claim biblical support for chattel slavery and segregation.
The overlap isn’t coincidental: all of these commitments flow from an authoritarian outlook that organizes people into a divinely ordained hierarchy, based largely on innate physical characteristics, and conceives of morality as a matter of obedience to one’s natural superiors.
They all hold that God has designed some people to exercise authority, and God has designed others to practice submission to authority. Moral order is achieved when we inhabit our God-ordained place in the hierarchy; and apart from that hierarchy, there is no morality.
According to this paradigm, there’s no inconsistency in holding a church gathering that violates public health mandates, and then invoking Romans 13 to admonish those who protest U.S. immigration policy or the rate at which our government kills and imprisons African Americans.
The men who embrace this conception of morality don’t even seem to understand the tension: by all appearances, they believe that Romans 13 is addressed to those for whom God has ordained submission—the disenfranchised and dispossessed—not those in authority, like themselves.
In their view, laws and public policies that crystalize inequity are evidence of God’s design rather than a consequence of human depravity: systemic inequality is an expression of moral truth rather than a transgression against it.
Authoritarian theologian (and great uncle of Jim Bob Duggar) John W. Duggar reasons explicitly along these lines in his 1954 essay, God’s Answer to Segregation, in which he purports to offer a biblical rationale for racial segregation.
The year he published God’s Answer to Segregation, Duggar co-founded the Baptist Missionary Alliance Theological Seminary (BMATS), where he served as professor, President (1973–83), and President Emeritus (1983–98). The library at BMATS, completed in 1981, bears his name.
TRIGGER WARNING: According to Duggar, “All races in the nation should have opportunity for education, for better living conditions, and for citizenship; but in this life they can never be equal in every respect any more than a man and a woman can be equal.
God made man for his place and woman for hers. He did not intend for them to change places. If you took all the men and made them housekeepers and took all the women and made them all bread-winners, there would be confusion in this world.
God let each of us be born in the sphere of His choosing. …we do not see stars trying to be the sun, or the moon trying to be a star. Everything in God’s universe has its place. … All humans differ. None are equal. The races are not equal.”
I don’t mean to suggest that fondness for patriarchy is identical to racism, or that all patriarchists are racists—rather that the push for gendered hierarchy and the push for racial hierarchy are animated by the same authoritarian impulse.
Moreover, once we’ve embraced the authoritarian’s premise that God has designed some people for dominion and others for submission, the line between gender-based subjugation and race-based subjugation is morally arbitrary.
The patriarchist might tell himself that he has Scripture to support his position while the racist does not. But as we’ve just demonstrated, the racist can match the patriarchist for biblical proof-texts, in both quantity and purported clarity.
Racists and patriarchists within evangelicalism don’t merely share an ideology, they fish in the same streams. BMATS, the seminary Duggar co-founded the year he published “God’s Answer to Segregation,” is among the sponsors of an upcoming conference
in Denton, TX: “Wokeness and the Gospel”. Speakers include a number of renowned patriarchists, including one newly minted Senior Fellow at the Family Research Council, known for his Duggar-like confidence in the clarity of biblical proof-texts that commend human subjugation.
Another of the conference’s sponsors is The Master’s Seminary, whose figurehead once had the temerity to suggest that an eminent female Bible teacher should “Go home,” only to demur when local health officials suggested he do the same.
(For his part, the current President of BMATS, Charley Holmes, said that McArthur’s admonition to “Go home” didn’t go far enough (Baptist Trumpet, Nov. 13, 2019). I’m not aware of any statement from Holmes or BMATS regarding Duggar’s racism.)
Whether it’s organized by race or gender, authoritarian theologians baptize their preferred social hierarchy in biblical proof-texts that they alone have the authority to interpret and deem sufficiently clear to bind the conscience of all believers.
The conservative evangelical conscience will remain fragmented as long as we attempt to derive morality from a curated collection of biblical proof-texts, tailored by men in power to justify the established order. faithphilosophyandpolitics.org/2021/05/26/rac…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Coley

Scott Coley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scott_m_coley

26 May
You and I can agree that Herman Melville is the author of Moby-Dick, even if we disagree about how to interpret Ahab’s obsession.

We can agree that John Milton wrote Paradise Lost even if we don’t agree on whether the narrative depicts creation ex nihilo or ex prima materia.
Similarly, fellow believers who share a high view of Scripture can disagree about the role that Scripture assigns to women:

Interpretive disagreement doesn’t imply a denial of God’s authorship.
At some point, the SBC has to reckon with the fact that the Conservatism of the Conservative Resurgence was at least as much cultural as it was theological—and a lot of that cultural Conservatism is either unrelated or antithetic to a high view of God’s Word.
Read 4 tweets
25 May
The danger of religious fundamentalism is that it blinds its adherents to the distinction between prevailing orthodoxy and objective truth. That’s why fundamentalists can see no difference between rejecting God’s Word and rejecting what they say about God’s Word.
That’s why fundamentalists in the SBC are so resistant to institutional reform: once we look beyond what’s good according to the established order and inquire into the goodness of the established order, moral authority shifts away from ambitious men and toward the truth itself.
Men at organizations like the Conservative Baptist Network, FoundersMin and the CBMW all advance orthodoxies that conform to their personal and political interests. But do their agendas conform to moral truth?
Read 14 tweets
23 May
I’m often asked why my tweets tend to focus on criticism—particularly as it concerns theobros. Here’s my typical response.
I don’t have strong views on ‘biblical manhood’ (a phrase that I find ridiculous). But my sense is that most of it comes down to being a good Christ-follower, which has nothing to do with the kind of muscular Christianity promoted by some of the more vocal hyper-complementarians.
Concerning my tendency of late to engage in negative critique on Twitter dot com, without much in the way of positive proposals: there are—as best I can discern my own motives—three reasons for this.
Read 16 tweets
21 May
The infirmity at the core of American evangelicalism is a vice that many white evangelicals regard as America’s greatest virtue:

The Blessed Sacrament of Ordered Liberty.

🧵
Every evening at Primetime, scores of devout American evangelicals gather with the rest of the Faithful—libertarians, Tea Partyers, neoliberals, neoconservatives, white nationalists, social Darwinists, et al.—in Eucharistic adoration at the Mass of Fox the News.
In the eyes of the Faithful, the deepest recesses of hell are reserved for blasphemers who tug at the shroud of sacred mystery in which Ordered Liberty is cloaked: those who partake of the Sacrament in spirit and in truth ask no questions about how our Liberty has been Ordered.
Read 5 tweets
11 May
Christ’s description of the Samaritan’s conduct toward the half-dead traveler operates entirely at the level of universal human need. For all the parable tells us, the injured traveler was unconscious for the duration of his time with the Samaritan.
Details about the content of the traveler’s life experience, past actions, belief system and moral outlook are totally absent from the narrative. Such details are therefore immaterial to the command that follows.
The Samaritan sees a man who lacks the capacity to care for himself, and lacks the money to pay someone else to care for him. So the Samaritan arranges to pay the full cost of the man’s care—insisting that he, the Samaritan, will reimburse the innkeeper for any additional costs.
Read 17 tweets
22 Mar
How did conservative evangelicals arrive at a place where, outside of one or two causes that cost nothing to promote, many don’t even pretend to integrate their faith with their politics?
In fact, such is the disarray of the evangelical political conscience that it may be helpful to comment on what it means to *integrate* faith and politics—i.e., what it means to have integrity.
As individuals, we all occupy a variety of social roles—e.g., spouse, parent, colleague, citizen and so on.

I have integrity when I approach each of these social roles in a way that’s consistent with how I approach the others.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(